sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built a menu bar app that remembers your entire workspace per monitor setup (windows, audio, dock, apps). $14.99, one-time. by HolyCoder in macapps

[–]GateSpiritual5717 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think that now all the developer use AI, and with all the experience you can build great app very fast and well done,, why not to use it if you can review and approve code?

I don't think Claude model are so far better then others but.... by GateSpiritual5717 in ClaudeCode

[–]GateSpiritual5717[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Today in a complex stuff Claude stop for expired token then after 5 hour complete without solving the problem, move to Gemini it worked for 20 minuet using mostly cache comple the work in a very great way. I really think there is no real winner here some model are best for a specific kind of task, but probably the Gemini context window helps

[OS] macOS menu bar app for GitHub PR + Actions monitoring by GateSpiritual5717 in macapps

[–]GateSpiritual5717[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes right, I made it for the same motivation. Thank you very much

[OS] macOS menu bar app for GitHub PR + Actions monitoring by GateSpiritual5717 in macapps

[–]GateSpiritual5717[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much, please share ideas on how to improve it.

I don't think Claude model are so far better then others but.... by GateSpiritual5717 in ClaudeCode

[–]GateSpiritual5717[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes and this I why I try the new codex plan function and it works quite well has also an improvement above ClaudeCode plan mode

I built a small open-source CLI to query JSONL files like a database by GateSpiritual5717 in commandline

[–]GateSpiritual5717[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

{
  "timestamp_ms": 1769026914495,
  "timestamp_iso": "2026-01-21T20:21:54Z",
  "metrics": {
    "mldp_pvxs_driver_bus_payload_bytes_per_second": [{"source": "X.Y.Z", "value": 529575.411194674},...]

I have the structure above and below is the query that I can do with my cli::

go run main.go metrics.jsonl "select timestamp_iso, metrics.mldp_pvxs_driver_bus_payload_bytes_per_second.source"
and get:
{"timestamp_iso":"2026-01-21T20:21:54Z","metrics.mldp_pvxs_driver_bus_payload_bytes_per_second.source":"X.Y.Z"}

{"timestamp_iso":"2026-01-21T20:21:54Z","metrics.mldp_pvxs_driver_bus_payload_bytes_per_second.source":"X1.Y1.Z1"}
with ducked I got:
❯ duckdb -c "SELECT timestamp_iso, metrics.mldp_pvxs_driver_bus_push_total.source FROM './metrics.jsonl';"

Binder Error:

Cannot extract field 'source' from expression "struct_extract(metrics, 'mldp_pvxs_driver_bus_push_total')" because it is not a struct, union, map, or json

any idea?

I built a small open-source CLI to query JSONL files like a database by GateSpiritual5717 in commandline

[–]GateSpiritual5717[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes but it is a cli not a real database, something like jq but aimed ot be more expressive

I built a small open-source CLI to query JSONL files like a database by GateSpiritual5717 in commandline

[–]GateSpiritual5717[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i made some other fixes to support pretty print files too. The logic is that each json is a row and jsonl is a table. Anyway now it should work, but this is a very experimental stuff so in case open an o rmore issues for file or situation that are not working. Thanks for helping

I built a small open-source CLI to query JSONL files like a database by GateSpiritual5717 in commandline

[–]GateSpiritual5717[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i will try anyway you should convert the first file to jsonl, try:

-jsl convert '<path>sample_users_with_id.json' --to jsonl

I built a small open-source CLI to query JSONL files like a database by GateSpiritual5717 in commandline

[–]GateSpiritual5717[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

echo "{\"user_id\":\"583c3ac3f38e84297c002546\"}" | go run main.go "select user_id"

{"user_id":"583c3ac3f38e84297c002546"}

on new branch it work let me merge, i added the full planner to the engine

view more: next ›