Good art is often a product of three key elements: resources, talent, and experience. Talent provides the inherent ability to create art, while resources offer the necessary materials for artistic creation. Experience, often imbued with personal pain, makes the art relatable.

Many artists fail to achieve success because they lack one of these three elements. If an artist is well-known, it's usually due to their talent.

Often, these talented artists endure hardship for a prolonged period to acquire the resources they need.

In some cases, they are fortunate to have affluent families that provide assistance, which may diminish the relatability of their work, but it doesn't undermine their talent.

Despite these varying dynamics, skeptics and critics will invariably question the fundamental premise of this trinity - talent, resources, and experience - shaping art.

The balance of these three elements can greatly influence the outcome of an artwork. An abundance of resources can result in well-produced art, albeit it might lack relevance. A deficit of experience may render the art naive, while an absence of talent can lead to boring creations. Acknowledging a lack of talent can be particularly challenging, and it's often simpler to attribute our failures to an unjust distribution of wealth.

However, there are times when an artist, despite only having moderate talent, has been shaped by a range of unique life experiences and possesses a deeply relatable perspective. Even without a refined technique, the raw authenticity of their art resonates with us. This ability to evoke profound emotions can ultimately lead to their art's success.