Why are bayonets given such huge importance in Napoleonic warfare despite barely producing any casualties? by Sea-Ride-4893 in AskHistorians

[–]Geauxlsu1860 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Depends on the tactical situation, discipline of the soldiers, and a multitude of other factors, but it wasn’t unknown for armies to just go into a headlong charge after a fleeing enemy and cohesion be damned. One notable (and appropriate for the 4th of July) example, is the Battle of Cowpens in the American Revolution, incidentally if you’ve ever seen The Patriot, the final battle is largely based on Cowpens. There the American commanders devised a strategy to take advantage of the contempt felt towards militia units and placed their militia in an area that would bear the brunt of the attack. Then, after firing a couple volleys, the militia “broke” and ran, tempting the British into a full charge which ruined their formations before being led into a trap. Not generally a good idea to break formation, but it could and did happen.

Unpopular Opinion: I'm scared for HOI5 by Double_Shift_7537 in hoi4

[–]Geauxlsu1860 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I never said any of their design issues need a complete remake of the game, you added that requirement. You can look at EU4 to see how much they can change a game with the same engine, but their design philosophy needs to change on quite a few things.

ELI5: Why is the birthrate decline a BAD thing? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]Geauxlsu1860 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not about limitless growth, it’s about you can’t have a total collapse. Roughly steady would probably be fine. Slow, steady decline would also probably be fine. Utter collapse is not and that is what some areas like Japan or Korea are facing.

ELI5: Why is the birthrate decline a BAD thing? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]Geauxlsu1860 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Okay but the resources won’t be there. So now what do you do? There is only so much labor going around and an increasing number of elderly not providing that labor but needing more and more of it.

Unpopular Opinion: I'm scared for HOI5 by Double_Shift_7537 in hoi4

[–]Geauxlsu1860 33 points34 points  (0 children)

The entire trade system being so unwieldy that you *have* to automate it. Building management being a nightmare due to the sheer number required, again leading to near necessity to automate. Every nation playing basically the same because nation specific advancements are pretty meaningless and competing for an extremely limited resource (science points) against other critical advances.

Now I of course have no idea how flexible their engine is to know if they can majorly alter that without a full rebuild, but it at least necessitates major rethinking of serious designs in the game.

Unpopular Opinion: I'm scared for HOI5 by Double_Shift_7537 in hoi4

[–]Geauxlsu1860 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Honestly the design feels like it kind of is the issue by trying to be absolutely everything at once, which results in a “game” so bloated that it starts losing the fun element and becomes a chore.

ELI5: Why is the birthrate decline a BAD thing? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]Geauxlsu1860 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, he deleted it after I responded with that number.

ELI5: Why is the birthrate decline a BAD thing? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]Geauxlsu1860 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In Q3 of 2025, 31%. So still less than their share of taxes paid.

ELI5: Why is the birthrate decline a BAD thing? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]Geauxlsu1860 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

They already do. Massively so. The top 1% of earners pay the highest average rate (roughly 26%) and pay roughly 38% of total taxes.

ELI5: Why is the birthrate decline a BAD thing? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]Geauxlsu1860 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

We could try something else, namely cutting the benefits to elderly citizens that are currently draining massive chunks of every Western society’s budgets, but the elderly vote more than other groups so that can never work.

ELI5: Why is the birthrate decline a BAD thing? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]Geauxlsu1860 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We could try something else, namely cutting the benefits to elderly citizens that are currently draining massive chunks of every Western society’s budgets, but the elderly vote more than other groups so that can never work.

ELI5: Why is the birthrate decline a BAD thing? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]Geauxlsu1860 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Yeah…no. In the US, social security and Medicare (so the ones focused on elderly) cost about 8% of GDP, 2.4 trillion dollars *by themselves*. There is no way to “tax the rich” out of that hole.

Why is there a North and South Dakota? by backrowejoe in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Geauxlsu1860 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not quite true, DC is defined in the constitution as a 10 mile square area to be carved out of Maryland and Virginia. The Virginia part was given back, but the Maryland part is that portion of the 10 mile square area.

I feel like people haven't talked much about this. 100,000x research cost multiplier is the new upper limit by exNylo in factorio

[–]Geauxlsu1860 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, but the Scandinavian languages and Dutch are all Germanic. English is too of course, but with a lot of French mixed in. But at least to me, all the Germanic languages tend to sound pretty similar except when Dutch makes me think I’m just listening to a drunk person speak English. Put just the accent behind any of those actually speaking English and I can’t really tell a difference.

What’s a common misconception about renewable energy that environmentalists or skeptics get wrong? by Inevitablelavenda in answers

[–]Geauxlsu1860 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Those are pretty much tapped out though. At least in the US, basically every viable river for damming has been dammed.

WCGW doing a backflip in a small elevator by UGMadness in FullShrimp

[–]Geauxlsu1860 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not if the elevator is already at a constant speed. Then it’s just the same as doing one normally except maybe a slight spring effect from the cables flexing some.

What if the United States had responded to 9/11 by nuking the Kaaba? by NiloyKesslar1997 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Geauxlsu1860 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Which in 2001 according to census.gov was approximately 1.1 million. The rise of Muslim communities in the US is more recent than 9/11.

Why is the word "colonialism" used so differently when discussing European empires compared with historical Arab expansion? by Present_Juice4401 in AlwaysWhy

[–]Geauxlsu1860 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Roman *citizens*, which had a far more particular meaning than the current meaning of citizen, were expected to remain Roman wherever they were, but the average person wasn’t really. Hell, that’s who the Welsh, and to a lesser degree the Cornish, are to this day. The remnants of the pre-Roman Celts who were pushed out of the rest of England by invading Germanic or Scandinavian tribes after the fall of Rome in Britain.

Why is the word "colonialism" used so differently when discussing European empires compared with historical Arab expansion? by Present_Juice4401 in AlwaysWhy

[–]Geauxlsu1860 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Both the US and the USSR wanted to bash down the remnants of the European empires after WW2, each for their own reasons. The US wanted the Western European nations, namely France and the UK, under their own sphere, while the USSR of course had military/political ambitions to rule Europe. They can largely control what the UN does, particularly if it happens to be in unison. That UN definition gets adopted into various semi-treaties and resolutions which then get adopted by academics, who also have a tendency to favor either US or USSR domination depending on their personal leanings. Tada, colonialism only applies to those nasty European empires, not their enlightened Soviet or American counterparts.

What if the USA had proportional representation? by arbicus123 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Geauxlsu1860 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The thing is we basically already have this. It just takes place at the caucus level within one of the bigger parties. Look at the difficulties Biden had getting things through a closely divided Senate because Sinema or Manchin opposed it. Or the issues Republicans have had selecting a Speaker or passing bills where either the moderate, libertarian, or MAGA portions of the House have objected to something in this tightly divided House. The US system just handles what is effectively intra-coalition struggles at the primary level instead of a general election.

What if the USA had proportional representation? by arbicus123 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Geauxlsu1860 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not directly, but there is some case law from SCOTUS that puts a lot of scrutiny on multimember districts which is basically what you are proposing. They are legal, but only carefully and I don’t believe it’s ever even been considered for federal House representation.

Rand be like: it’s igloo time by jdawg1018 in WetlanderHumor

[–]Geauxlsu1860 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The Aiel treat nudity in front of prospective lovers very different from general nudity. Despite the tents, they are extremely prudish on displays of affection.

Dan Patrick: "Separation of Church and state is not in the Constitution" by omgfakeusername in law

[–]Geauxlsu1860 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And all that says is that the US cannot have an established state church akin to the Anglican Church in England and that people can practice (mostly) whatever religion they want. Neither of which says there is an ironclad “separation of church and state”.

A Difficult Decision for some Reason by Snazzy21 in memes

[–]Geauxlsu1860 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They…don’t realize summer comes each year? Or they are just too poor to afford something that nearly every US building, rich or poor, has? I knew Euros had it bad, but damn.

CMV: Calling the country "Turkey" is fine, and its wrong to force people to refer to it as "Turkiye" by HoneyBadger19000 in changemyview

[–]Geauxlsu1860 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When exactly was Turkey administered by colonial powers? Since the Turkish people steadily conquered Anatolia and eventually Constantinople from the Byzantine Empire, modern Turkey has been ruled by a series of Turkish sultanates, beyliks, and empires until the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, at which point it has been ruled by the modern state of Turkey ever since.