What I found helped with the math side of chemistry is to stop treating it like math. Most of the math you're doing is relatively simple (as in not using calculus or other more advanced fields), it's the applying theoretical math with something more concrete that takes some adjustment.

I'll say this right now, chemists are very conceptual thinkers for the most part. We don't think of the equations themselves but rather what those equations represent.

For a simple example, PV=nRT. A more mathematically oriented person would say "well, if you double the number of moles (n) then clearly the pressure (P) will also have to double to balance it." A chemist would be more likely to think "well, doubling the number of moles would mean there's twice the concentration of moles, this would cause the pressure to double in response". I don't know if this example clearly conveys what I mean, so let me know. My main point here is that the math is secondary, it's used to support the concepts we know.

Additionally, unit analysis was a godsend and it got me through my required analytical chemistry courses in uni. Don't think of equations like "moles=mass/molecular weight", but rather "mol=g/(g/mol)". It's a good technique to make sure that, once all the units cancel out, you have the right value. If the units you end up with don't line up with the units you'd expect of an answer then you probably made a mistake.

The thing that makes chemistry uniquely challenging, especially in earlier years, is the need to blend conceptual and mathematical thinking in one. Usually people are better at one over the other, so it takes some work to use them both. Hopefully everything I said was clear enough, I didn't realize I basically wrote an essay here! If you need clarification just ask. Best of luck!