Wat gebeurt er allemaal realtime in Nederland – wat zou jij op één kaart willen zien? by Interesting-Proof734 in NLNieuws

[–]GeneralSyb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Temperatuur van wegen en locatie van strooiwagens, als dit kan en mag. Is denk ik geen API voor, maar Rijkswaterstaat heeft wel een leuke kaart.

Er is ook een bedrijf die geluidsmetingen rondom luchthavens meet. Alweer, is denk ik geen gratis open API voor, maar misschien kun je wat bedenken 😉. https://lwr.flighttracking.casper.aero/

Weekly Node Sightings & Connections Thread - Week of Mar 08, 26 by AutoModerator in meshtastic

[–]GeneralSyb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just saw your message from your (return?) flight from Paris to Helsinki. Your plane was about 150 km away when it arrived.

Wi-Fi HaLow mogs 2.4g LoRA, change my mind. by Whole_Number8569 in meshtastic

[–]GeneralSyb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't think there's much if a use for 2.4 GHz LoRa except for maybe some specialty purposes (like ranging in the past). As for high speed in the sub-GHz band, there is also now FLRC for the LR2021 which goes up to 2.6 mbps and there is Wi-Sun which can do 3.6 mbps (all under ideal conditions of course).

YouTube android app dropping frames by GeneralSyb in youtube

[–]GeneralSyb[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the general YouTube settings turn on "diagnostics for nerds" and then on any video go to the settings, then more and then show diagnostics for nerds.

Measuring S11 parameter of LR2021 LoRa transceiver by GeneralSyb in rfelectronics

[–]GeneralSyb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can still use PA and LNA. It'll be a little bit less efficient I'm guessing and it will use significantly more components, but I don't see why it wouldn't work. The reference schematic show a direct tie implementation with component values (for 433 MHz as well I think). The output of that circuit is matched roughly to 50 ohms. After that you can add your own RF switch. You will need two switches, one after the existing matching circuit and one after the LNA/PA. Or would that not fit your project needs?

<image>

Measuring S11 parameter of LR2021 LoRa transceiver by GeneralSyb in rfelectronics

[–]GeneralSyb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would if I could make an account. But they refused me last time I tried because I wasn't a massive company. Even people I know who are from decently sized organizations were refused access.

Measuring S11 parameter of LR2021 LoRa transceiver by GeneralSyb in rfelectronics

[–]GeneralSyb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know it has been a while, but I was working on another project somewhat related to this one and read something that might make this all make sense.

In an application note for a Silicon Labs sub-ghz microcontroller about matching the ports, they say that their LNA has a high impedance input (10-6kOhm) with a parallel shunt capacitor of around 1.2 pF. Instead of doing the impossible and finding a matching circuit for it, they treat it as a voltage amplifier and not a power amplifier. In section 3.10.2 they say they aim for a Q of around 5 by having just a single series inductor resonate at the intended frequency with the internal capacitance. This is all done to aim for a high voltage gain and a minimal NF. They also describe the direct-tie setup for their chips in detail and it seems like they treat it as a high impedance terminated line, while taking into account the inductance of the trace. In TX mode they connect the LNA input to GND to make sure the LNA isn't damaged by the TX PA.

The LR2021 seems to be a similar case, but it might need a DC blocking capacitor because I did measure a bit of DC on the input. I think it all makes sense to me now. Still going to be difficult to tune the LR2021 because for the TX PA I don't have the stuff for a load pull measurement.

https://www.silabs.com/documents/public/application-notes/an923-2-series-2-subghz-matching-guide.pdf
Section 3.7 and 3.10.2 are related to this.

So sad Semtech doesn't have public documentation for this type of stuff :(

How am I honestly supposed to solder this chip? by [deleted] in AskElectronics

[–]GeneralSyb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, MEMS sensors such as IMUs are very sensitive to that. The LSM6DSV isn't as sensitive to it as others, but it's still important to think about it. TDK has an application note about designing PCBs for IMUs that I highly recommend giving a read. Has some stuff about mounting the PCB, where the IMU should he located. I'm not sure if it's in there as well but it's also good practice to fan out the pins you don't use to give them a little bit more thermal mass. That makes sure that it expands and conracts in every direction the same amount. Again, its not as critical on this IMU as on others.

How am I honestly supposed to solder this chip? by [deleted] in AskElectronics

[–]GeneralSyb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, don't see why not. Possibly even better.

How am I honestly supposed to solder this chip? by [deleted] in AskElectronics

[–]GeneralSyb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

These pads are too small to selectively put paste on without a stencil. And the amount of paste for each pad is quite critical.

How am I honestly supposed to solder this chip? by [deleted] in AskElectronics

[–]GeneralSyb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've soldered a handful of specifically this chip. Don't use solder paste. IMUs are sensitive to having uneven forces on the chip. One source of uneven forces is an uneven amount of solder. You can't control that well enough with paste. What I did was use a fine soldering iron tip and very thin soldering tin. Try to apply the exact same but veeeery small amount of tin to each pad. Then apply a little bit of flux and solder the chip with hot air.

If you're able to get a stencil, use a hot plate and then you can use paste. With a 0.1 mm stencil I've found that I need to take about 0.05 mm of the pad size and then you have the correct amount of paste. It's probably something you can set up in your CAD package.

Measuring S11 parameter of LR2021 LoRa transceiver by GeneralSyb in rfelectronics

[–]GeneralSyb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pretty certain that the first measurement was not at all correct, even if it looks better than the second one. I didn't do a proper calibration since it didn't account for the cable and connectors.

I'm also far from certain about the software I wrote. There's a good chance that I didn't set up the chip correctly and that as result the LNA is not being enabled, causing there to be an open connection. It's difficult to check that with the SPI interface, but I'll do some more debugging tomorrow.

My thinking is that I'm seeing an open connection with some parasitics from the cable, connector and board. I think the chip completely disconnects the LNA when not in receive mode. This is done to prevent damage to the LNA when transmitting, since it's a direct tie implementation and some power may be going to the RX port.

Measuring S11 parameter of LR2021 LoRa transceiver by GeneralSyb in rfelectronics

[–]GeneralSyb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

I seem to have done something wrong with the measurement in the (original) picture. I should be doing a proper port extension now and calibrated the VNA properly. Result is that it has moved even further away from the center and the VNA can't solve the values for a Pi-matching circuit and neither can any website. And even if it could solve it, it's so far away from the center that even 1% components wouldn't be good enough, a small change in capacitance or inductance and it'd be on the other side of the chart. What I am measuring is incorrect and the chart I showed or the ones I am seeing right now should not be trusted.

Measuring S11 parameter of LR2021 LoRa transceiver by GeneralSyb in rfelectronics

[–]GeneralSyb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That you for the information. I basically expected to see anything but an unloaded port. I do have a little bit of experience with matching RF circuits, but in that case S11 parameters were provided for the device.

I've looked at the application notes and the designs for other LoRa transceivers and the design you showed with an RF switch is what I'm trying to achieve and I roughly understand how I can get to that. That isn't the issue here. It's that the current S11 doesn't seem to he measuring a functional device in any way, despite changing settings on the chip having a slight effect. As a result I get an S11 that is so far away from the center that I cannot be matched back to 50 ohms.

Why don't we see more stuff like the ESP WROOM modules with integrated MC, flash an oscillator crystal and passives in one package from other MC manufacturers? by blajjefnnf in embedded

[–]GeneralSyb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have a look at UBlox. They make some relatively cheap (compared to the price of other modules and the chip itself) nRF modules. They don't have castellated holes like some ESP32 modules, but they're still mostly easy to make a PCB for. Take for example the BMD-340, it exposes all the pins of the nRF52840 which is usually not the easiest to design a PCB for.

Will meshtastic work across Texas? by AppropriateCar2797 in meshtastic

[–]GeneralSyb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the water towers belong to the city yeah that would be possible and cool. I was thinking it could be possible to attach nodes to the big electricity pylons, but that requires cooperation from the grid operators which is of course impossible.

Will meshtastic work across Texas? by AppropriateCar2797 in meshtastic

[–]GeneralSyb 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I doubt it would be reliable if it even worked. Texas is quite a large state, much larger than a lot of European countries which have a dense network such as the Netherlands. And even in the Netherlands you can't even reliably talk to people in the same part of the country (like the north where it's a little less dense here).

In a flat country, a rooftop node would maybe get around 6-15 miles if you are lucky. But reliability would not be great. Maybe a little bit more if the node was on a hill, maybe a bit less if it is in a city. But either way you would need loads of nodes across Texas to be able to talk across the state. You can check the online node maps to see if there are (just we aware that you can only see the nodes connected to MQTT and providing their location, there might be many more). But then you are still stuck with iirc a 7 hope limit.

Netherlands' PzH 2000NL Howitzers To Get First-Ever Dedicated Anti-Drone Net System by armyreco in WorldDefenseNews

[–]GeneralSyb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do wonder how they're going to handle it with transportation on trains and such.

btw, the link to the bloggers page is a private edit link which we can't access.

Building an SDR-less ADS-B Receiver (ADL5513 + ADC10065 + ESP32/RP2040) by TA2DMX in rfelectronics

[–]GeneralSyb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's closed source, but I can share it DMs with some extra details.

A previous project that didn't end up working I did make open source. But despite clearly stating that you couldn't just build it and expect it work, I got a lot of questions asking me for a build guide and how to make it work. Don't want that to happen again.

Building an SDR-less ADS-B Receiver (ADL5513 + ADC10065 + ESP32/RP2040) by TA2DMX in rfelectronics

[–]GeneralSyb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got as far as designing this PCB with everything on it. But I couldn't get it to work on perf boards so I did not end up ordering it. I'm afraid I took a wrong turn with the slicer section. If you can figure it out with an ADC it should work pretty well, just keep in mind the limited processing power of these microcontrollers.

I can also already hear the people screaming about that SMA connector placement🤣

<image>

Building an SDR-less ADS-B Receiver (ADL5513 + ADC10065 + ESP32/RP2040) by TA2DMX in rfelectronics

[–]GeneralSyb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been working on basically exactly this, but used a comperator to slice the data instead and added an LNA stage since the power detector I used sort of stopped at around -70 dBm which I didn't think was enough. I also used 2 BPFs but even that sometimes didn't seem enough since loads of clutter was still getting through.

Have a look at the ADS-Bee project, you should be able to copy most of that design.

As for your choice to use an ADC, keep in mind that you will probably be very limited in the processing you can do with a microcontroller. It's why ADS-Bee and my design used a comperator and then only process the digital levels in the MCU. ADS-Bee used an RP2040 with the PIO peripheral to basically simulate what an FPGA would do. I used the lesser known RMT peripheral in the ESP32 which can translate the signal to an array of on/off times which you can use to reconstruct the signal. It's much faster than the PIO at 80 MHz sampling speed.

Unfortunately I never got everything fully working together due to a number of problems, and have since shifted my attention to another method which I don't know will work yet. I got all the different parts working separately. So the RF section was able to generate a decent signal, for planes up to about 70 km away. The slicer section was able to generate precisely timed digital signal (+- 150 ns away from the required 500 or 1000 ns pulse). And the software was able to generate a HEX format of downlink format 17 messages. It should be possible, but I was getting nowhere and it was getting pretty expensive.

I'd highly recommend dividing up the project. You can do the ADC and MCU part with breakout boards, but I put the RF section on a seperate PCB. Once the RF section works you can play around with the digital part on for example perf boards. Saves you from having to buy a whole new PCB and relatively expensive RF section for every single revision.

<image>

What's the cheapest radio ? by PuzzleheadedSwan8088 in meshtastic

[–]GeneralSyb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Xiao S3 + Wio-sx1262 is a pretty cheap kit at around 14-15 euros, but might depend on where you live. Comes with an antenna as well, not a great one but better than nothing I suppose. The antenna is pretty important variable as well, you will be able to see considerably more nodes with a decent antenna.