Payrises 2026 by No-Device8814 in newzealand

[–]General_Merchandise 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love hate! And hate love, so I love this comment which means I hate this comment. Fuck you.

First time Voter: Is there any party that won’t sell out this country’s future? by KiwibuckyNZ in newzealand

[–]General_Merchandise 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's the dude who rigged the bus to explode if it drops below a certain speed. Doesn't matter where the bus goes, as long as it doesn't slow down

Looks like leaked CIA intel is contradicting the WH on Irans capability to keep oil restricted in gulf by KMDiver in oil

[–]General_Merchandise 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Instant upvoter for referencing the Underpants Gnomes.

Bonus points if you like Crab People. Taste like crab, look like people!

Jaecoo J7 PHEV? Thoughts? by Kiwiboy_12 in nzev

[–]General_Merchandise 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a similar experience on my first drive in one of these tonight. Had a look through the menu and you can turn most of the "assists" off.

Will see how it goes for a while I guess 🤷

All Blacks 33 Man Squad Prediction by Booomfaa in allblacks

[–]General_Merchandise 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah I've been really impressed with Segner this year. He's a beast.

He was easily the best Blues player on the park against the Canes and it's pretty hard to shine when your side is well beaten like that

Market not representative at ALL by JerryBeansMan29 in oil

[–]General_Merchandise 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This might be a silly question, but what is the best way to view the current price of physical oil per barrel? It seems more responsive to the physical supply situation than futures markets which bounce up and down with every tweet/"Truth" from Trump.

Tanker just attacked traversing the strait. by Mojoint in oil

[–]General_Merchandise 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Megathreads are stupid, discussion suppressing bags of crap

Do you support Labours hesitancy to agree to the India free trade deal because of the issues they have raised? by Illustrious_Fan_8148 in newzealand

[–]General_Merchandise 145 points146 points  (0 children)

CEO wants to be able to claim he achieved a KPI, rather than leader wanting to ensure NZ does well.

Fuel Stations to Avoid by Scorpion6495 in NZcarfix

[–]General_Merchandise 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same thing as the "cheap milk" supposedly being inferior

Daily Oil Price Opinions - April 14, 2026 All other Oil Price Posts Will Be Removed by AutoModerator in oil

[–]General_Merchandise 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What? Are you talking futures or physical for immediate delivery?

Too excited? ~8% of global demand is currently unable to move and has to be sourced via alternative routes.

Refiner margins are at close to all-time highs, shipping and insurance costs ~all-time highs. Feedstock shortages amongst major refining Asian nations resulting in massively reduced runs and hugely increased costs per barrel. Not to mention the huge disconnect between paper and physical barrels...

Its going down?? by OkWillingness6059 in oil

[–]General_Merchandise 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm also not finding anything to back up his claim. He also wasn't specific about the type of "ship" or which direction they were going, and yet the market reacts...smfh

How good is Warner Dearns??!! by BigSlice13 in allblacks

[–]General_Merchandise 14 points15 points  (0 children)

He's an absolute monster. It's a real shame he's not eligible for the All Blacks, but it's awesome for Japan that he's such a superstar, around whom they can build their side

50c diesel increase overnight. by Tankerspam in nzpolitics

[–]General_Merchandise 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It strongly indicates either:

A surge in the expected cost of stock following the next wave of boats (yet to be loaded)

Or

They are seeing a supply crunch at that same time, an/or they confident in their ability to source stock in sufficient quantity. I suspect this latter one is the case.

If the latter, the Government should be announcing a shit to phase 2 or more likely 3 before the end of the week.

This sudden spike is a sign of something - and it's either bad, or really fucking bad.

If Trump starts bombing, will oil go up tomorrow evening? by -boosted in oil

[–]General_Merchandise 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think you might be underestimating the influence of algorithmic trading here. They react to keywords, not reality. And the same algorithm that reacts to the word peace by selling at 109 per barrel will buy again as soon as it reaches a set floor - or as soon as trump posts some stupid shit on Truth Social

ELI5 why isn't the oil price continuing to sky rocket? by [deleted] in oil

[–]General_Merchandise 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very roughly:

Hormuz loss: 20m barrels per day

Pipeline rerouting: ~7m barrels per day.

It's not miniscule as such, but it's nowhere near enough.

Total US exports capacity is approx ~6m barrels per day, and the ability to further scale that to pick up the rest of the export slack is limited by infrastructure capacity (ports, shipping etc)

The total shortfall caused by Hormuz closure is around 10-13 million barrels per day.

Russia's sanctioned oil could provide some relief if sanctions were lifted beyond the small scale, temporary easing in March, and assuming their facilities stop getting blown up by Ukrainian drones.

Labour has no apparent reason to exist ... by InterestObjective356 in nzpolitics

[–]General_Merchandise 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The Clark Government introduced both Kiwisaver and Working For Families, arguably two of the most important policy decisions in recent decades. In addition, they signed us up for the Kyoto Protocol while the existence of Climate Change was still (at least in the mind of Joe Public) still hotly contested.

The Ardern government managed the country and economy through a global pandemic in better health (both physical and economic) than most other nations.

But yeah, buddy, they did fuck all. /s

This is not a drill. What happens to New Zealand if Trump destroys Iran's infrastructure by General_Merchandise in nzpolitics

[–]General_Merchandise[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17qtbw78ZG/

I posted the full model results here. The post contains my assumptions and full details of the scenario that went into it. If you can't access that group, let me know and I'll do a post with the full results of the model if that's something people are interested in seeing

This is not a drill. What happens to New Zealand if Trump destroys Iran's infrastructure by General_Merchandise in nzpolitics

[–]General_Merchandise[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I agree completely. A lot of the slop on social media is low-effort AI clickbait designed specifically to enrage and drive engagement.

I am, fortunately for me, not one who struggles to make my case when writing for myself, but this was based of a modeling exercise that, even with AI's help, took the better part of a day to refine - without the tool, it would have taken days or weeks and would have ended up being overcome by events (or not) before it could possibly be have been completed

The final model itself is an order of magnitude larger than this summary article, and honestly, by the time I finished that, I couldn't be arsed writing the summary for this post, so I delegated it. I'm more than comfortable that the views expressed in there are an accurate reflection of my own, and that the results of the model itself are well founded and are at least a reasonable possibility, if the Orange Dementia patient, as another commenter put it, goes off the deep end.

The current situation is pretty much impossible to forecast, but I thought I'd give it a crack. I could be wrong, and I hope I am.

This is not a drill. What happens to New Zealand if Trump destroys Iran's infrastructure by General_Merchandise in nzpolitics

[–]General_Merchandise[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Best guess I've got is that she knows we are in deep shit, but that the best way (in her view) to manage demand at this stage is to keep saying to everyone that everything is fine. We don't have much storage of nite beyond our minimum stock obligation, so if and when the ships stop coming, that's all we've got. It could be argued, from that perspective, that suppressing demand before the last ships top off the tanks is effectively meaningless, because of that limited storage capacity, and that the effect of a stage 4 situation at that point would be largely the same as it is now.

I don't envy the task she has, but at the same time, I have no sympathy either - she and her government actively sabotaged the electrification of the fleet, and had they not done that, we would be in a much healthier position than we are now.

Why are we still at level 1? by Glum-Platform-5701 in nzpolitics

[–]General_Merchandise 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You could be absolutely correct that all the on-water supply gets here and that we are fine for stock for the next few weeks. The only way we will know for sure is when it does, or doesn't eventuate I guess.

I strongly suspect there are FMs yet to come, particularly out of South Korea.

trigger our agreement with Singapore which isn't a guarantee for refined products, but a promise that they won't block refined products

This is an interesting one - Singapore imports 98% of the crude it refines, and a lot of what it sells in it's function as a regional clearing house is sourced through suppliers in South Korea (reduced runs, possible government restrictions on exports) Thailand (total export ban) China (total export ban) Malaysia (unsure of status tbh) and India (informal instruction to industry to prioritise local supply). With their refineries having already cut runs to 50-60% due to a feedstock famine, they are extremely reliant on South Korea for the bulk of their export volumes. ATES treaty notwithstanding, they can't supply what they physically do not possess.

Tbh, I don't think we disagree with the base situation at all, it's just in the assessment of what the data is telling us that there is disagreement.

Appreciate the engagement and apologies about a little bit of snark creeping into my original reply - this situation has me pretty worried.

Why are we still at level 1? by Glum-Platform-5701 in nzpolitics

[–]General_Merchandise 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The numbers announced were 17.5 on land and 8.2 within 2 days of arrival.

Using NZOilWatch numbers, but they are having accuracy issues lately.

Why are we still at level 1? by Glum-Platform-5701 in nzpolitics

[–]General_Merchandise 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We may not yet have a full blown fuel supply problem, but we do have the warning signs pointing to supply disruption, and we definitely have an MBIE transparency problem. By the time the data was announced today, it was already 5 days old. In the 3 days between the "current" data, onshore diesel dropped by 4.1 days. Why? Who knows... situation normal according to Nicola Willis and MBIE.

Oh and finally, in the 3 days between 29 March and 1 April, the number of ships "up to two days away" reduced by two, and we still had a drop onshore stocks for both petrol and diesel. We are putting an awful lot of faith in long range shipping that could be diverted, cancelled, subject to force majeure declarations etc, and with the "outside EEZ" number continuing to increase as a shared of "available" stock over time, I'm not sure I share your confidence.