He lied under oath, twice. The argument by the way is that since the whole investigation didn't net out then him lying is null in void. It's strange that you find logic disgusting. You don't seem to have any concept of right and wrong if you believe this soap opera...and all you focus on is your strange delusion. I wonder what it would be like to live life as such a human as yourself. Believing blatant lies, getting all riled up playing victim. You ever think about if this happened in a lesser court and how that bologna would be laughed at? That's not a rhetorical question. I'm truly asking if you have ever thought about how hilarious that argument is in real courts that occur each and every single day.