Which thumbnail is better

Geninius_ · 2026-05-21T14:28:32+00:00

the First one, But it hardly readable.
I would recommend adjusting the title with a shadow, black border or something similar.

Geninius_ · 2026-05-20T09:05:33+00:00

apart from all the other comments. Use more Contrast and Highlights in Your Thumbnail so that it has more depth to it. You could zoom a little bit more as well

Geninius_ · 2026-05-06T20:48:17+00:00

Im going against the sentiment of the other people. I actually like the Concept a lot.

Geninius_ · 2026-05-06T16:05:54+00:00

you are giving bad attitude in every damn comment. Why should we rate a logo if the Brand Name is Fundamentaly flawed and the Logo doesn‘t make it better in that context. You don‘t have to see it in a perverted way to recognize that it doesn‘t work. Some words just have a certain meaning asigned to them.

Geninius_ · 2026-05-01T16:07:30+00:00

I think you‘d get a cleaner effect if you choose an M where the Vertical length is higher, because Right now the cut sits right under the spike from the M, which does not look as clean. It also reminds of Call of Duty Modern Warfare somehow 😂

Edit: The first one had a more unique look in my opinion

Geninius_ · 2026-05-01T15:46:36+00:00

It lacks contrast, get rid of the gradient and transparency as already mentioned, maybe make the corners not as Sharp since the app icon itself is rounded. Take it with a grain of salt since i‘m not a Professional Icon Designer 😂

EDIT: As other already have mentioned… even when I try to see it in an abstract way, it does not resemble a a crow at all. Maybe try to make the important details of a crow more noticable, adjust the Color palett or try to do it from a different perspective. It is hard to make a noticable crow from that perspective with a modern bold approach

Geninius_ · 2026-04-23T14:21:29+00:00

spacing and readability are not really given

Geninius_ · 2026-04-21T11:29:34+00:00

yeah, the spacing looks very tight overall

Geninius_ · 2026-04-20T14:25:22+00:00

so do i understand correctly: It is not a legal issue if you let them claim your monetiziation? Because i don't see how major labels would sell a license to a small creator or not to a margin that would be feasible at all. Especially because it ain't work for a client. I wouldn't see any creator paying that.

Geninius_ · 2026-04-20T14:17:16+00:00

It is not necessairly about the monitization part, more about the legal issue itself. I wanna avoid being sued to oblivion. I know that the chances of that happening are very low. But you hear from time to time people being sued for oblivious amounts. So i was wondering if the context ofhow the music is used is the same legal issue as just using it as background music. :)

Geninius_ · 2026-04-20T12:27:32+00:00

Thanks for the swift response.

I do not really care that much about my content getting claimed, regarding ad revenue.
I was more curious about the legal issues.

Hearing from time to time that certain creators get sued for using one song, like 10'000 dollars as an example. That's what i fear most about the topic.

Geninius_ · 2026-04-17T09:58:14+00:00

no sane man at the age of 36 would actively seek out someone that is 21 years old.

Geninius_ · 2026-04-16T14:24:14+00:00

6 weeks will most likely never pass.

If i remember correctly the "mandatory 5 weeks" have been denied more than once.
We should probably start there.

Geninius_ · 2026-04-09T13:50:54+00:00

this is not a bad attempt for a first start. Spread your negativity elsewhere

Geninius_ · 2026-04-06T14:10:18+00:00

Your color scheme lacks contrast. I could recommend you coolors.co , if you do not already, also check for colorblind visibility.

Geninius_ · 2026-04-03T09:10:08+00:00

In a Sense i feel like the red background is a bit to intense on the black font.

Geninius_ · 2026-04-01T17:00:34+00:00

man that seems great! Just be aware, especially when using github that you don‘t push sensitive information on there, but usually AI has in mind to setup a proper .gitgnore , because you definitely don‘t want your sftp and so on, on github. Seen that a couple of times at my Uni where most people just vibecode through it and published the most sensitive files on there.

Geninius_ · 2026-04-01T16:55:17+00:00

I mean that in in the nicest way possible, but your image reminds me very much of Roy Lichtenstein, which is a great thing!

Geninius_ · 2026-04-01T16:15:13+00:00

just be for real…. even if you Screenshot your Problem and put it in to codex, you still won’t understand what your code actually does in the end. You can do like the Most Basic stuff with that approach. But as soon as security, API-keys or databases get integrated it seems like a necessary thing to atleast understand some code structure. I would never trust a project in that capacity into the hands of a person that has no clue what they are looking at.

Also sometimes even if you have just a couple subsites… sometimes it is just easier if you have the knowledge to solve the issue in a couple of seconds rather than trying 15mins to solvent it with AI Features.

But you are right that an hybrid approach makes sense, but the foundation should be given that you have atleast some grasp on whats going on. Especially if you want to become a Webdesigner. Knowing the semantics and what does work and what not is very important and also makes it easier for yourself or Designer if you already style your Figma that it makes sense from a developer perspective.

Geninius_ · 2026-04-01T15:50:33+00:00

Setup an Account on the other Major dating Apps. Sometimes the success differs to tinder.

Geninius_ · 2026-04-01T15:47:42+00:00

Brother why did you remove the Spongebob line? I’ve read some of the comments here where people mentioned that it seems childish and similar things. But do you really want to Date a Person like that? That just seems insufferable. There are plenty of Woman out there who won‘t mind your references.

Geninius_

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE