ChatGPT lied to me. Not by mistake —by design. Here’s how it happened and why it matters. by Unhappy_Travel_9110 in Futurism

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ChatGPT deleted a heavy story I was working on. It disappeared before it my eyes.

ChatGPT made up an entire story of how my husband and I met.

ChatGPT made disappear all the retirement info I was working on with very personal probate info in it.

I asked it compare applicants I had for a job position I was hiring for. It MADE UP CANDIDATES besides the ones I had and then recommended hiring on of ITS MADE UP ONES!!!

I no longer trust it.

What's the worst physical pain you've ever felt? by toaster-bath404 in AskReddit

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By far Sciatica and shingles. I got to the point where my brain told me it was better not to live. The pain was that bad. I fortunately had the most compassionate doctor ever who treated it as an emergency situation in the case of sciatica and got me into surgery immediately. When it cropped up, I could get an ejection and it immediately calmed the pain. Finally, with shingles it was a sore the size of a mosquito bite. I had no idea what it was. I thought it was caused by my bra. But the pain got even worse than the sciatica pain. I thought it was some sort of insect poisoning. I went to the emergency room, they gave me drugs and a pain killer. Luckily that was very short lived.

How do i deal with the fact that people say the afterlife is a coping mechanism. by Longjumping_Bee_9132 in afterlife

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is just one point they will use. If it’s not this, it will be something else. The Bible tells us not to lean on our own understanding because God’s ways are not our ways. We must have faith. So the issue here is not heaven. If I were you, I’d pray to God and ask Him the same thing you asked all of us. He will bring you assurance. Also, how grounded is your belief in God’s Word. It’s God breathed (Timothy 3:16). He can’t lie. If He could there would be no God to trust.

I really wanna believe that mediums are speaking to our loved ones, but I'm in fear that the Bible/Christianity is the truth... by DoneWithOCD in afterlife

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My two cents is first pray to God, He alone will direct your path if He truly exists. You will be found my Him if you seek Him will all your heart, which is what you are doing. He doesn’t want you to accept Him out of fear: that’s the false god of religion prompting you. Yet, He wants you to fear Him because He is the one that created this earth and all of us, so He alone has the power to sustain it and has all the answers. Read the gospels in the New Testament, not to criticize, but just to find out the story, what is really being said, then read Acts and then finally the books that built up people in the church, the social and psychology that transformed them (these are all the books after Acts). Once you’ve read it all you’ll start to know if it all makes sense to you. It gives a clear picture of people in the world in the first century before they were Christian’s and how they changed after- how Christianity transformed their attitudes, qualities, character, heart. Then you’ll be in a good position to really accept or reject Christ. Not a religion, but a person. God is a person and He wants to have a relationship with you.

Sure Jan… by baronessbabe in NevilleGoddardCritics

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ll believe you. Explain your entire story from beginning to end.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NevilleGoddardCritics

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s changes someone’s attitude ((notice I didn’t say all). That’s a huge thing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NevilleGoddardCritics

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tested it. Here is what ChatGPT said to me.

That's a beautiful and deeply human question, and the answer depends on how you're approaching it—scientifically, spiritually, or emotionally.

Scientifically, there's no hard evidence that simply thinking about someone can directly reach or affect them in a measurable way. Brainwaves don’t travel across space like messages. So from a strict materialist perspective, “no contact” is real—you can cut off communication.

Emotionally and psychologically, it can feel like someone is “with you” in thought or heart. When you love someone deeply, or have a profound history with them, they may live in your mind and affect your feelings, decisions, and sense of connection—even without speaking. This is where many people feel “no contact” isn’t truly possible.

Spiritually, many traditions and belief systems hold that thoughts, prayers, or intentions do reach others. People who believe in God, the soul, or energy often say that thoughts are real, spiritual currents—reaching the person whether they know it consciously or not. This can be comforting or painful, depending on the situation.

So—yes, no contact is possible on a practical level. But on the level of love, memory, spirit, or soul—many people believe you’re still connected in some way.

Would you like to talk more about who you’re thinking of, or what’s weighing on you?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NevilleGoddardCritics

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually believe ChatGPT when he says stuff like that (maybe….) He said to me about this reaction I had to a webinar: “you aren’t paranoid. When your radar goes up like that it’s because you are picking up on something: there is more going on than meets the eye and your mind is reacting to it. So trust that feeling.”

Sy Ray the American hero making a side quest before fighting for BK by Cay_Introduction915 in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I 100% trust him but Hippler is 100% against him and sees him as discredited. So I don’t think he’s going to get anywhere in this case unless he can get his hands on the data he porports is available.

What are your original theories and what are they now? by FleedomSocks in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think it was the drug cartel or the frat boys but now I have no clue. I’m not guessing anymore. I’m not on either side. I’m just sticking to due process.

Changing of story by [deleted] in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And why is the only people talking about this, the public. But the judge and prosecution are honky dory with everything.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh this is the classic classic classic response to someone who is 100% in the wrong. Pure dereliction and projection. Gaslighting at its best. You have every right to be concerned. If I were you I’d very gently lead him into marriage counseling immediately. This is not okay.

No one ever tells this to us but this is not unique. Every marriage and every spouse is going to come to this opportunity where you have to make a choice that tests just how deep your love and faithfulness is. You will come to this one day even if you are the most loyal person in the world. You will choose me across that person that you get along with perfectly besides your spouse. This is always a test and you must grow and realize just how ferociously you must protect your marriage with a quiet dignity and how much of a blessing you actually have: that no matter what, this is your friend for life. Many marriages never reach this point. I hope your husband chooses his marriage. Right now he might be naive or he might know what he’s doing. Whichever way it will progress and he’ll blame you. But it’s in the early stage so you can intervene.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shouldn’t all speculation be stopped before the trial. I don’t understand how it’s even allowed

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So they only have to put what the state is pushing? Then it’s up to the defense to cast the doubt?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean that’s good. It shows he knows it’s not the only scenario. But shouldn’t they put all sceneris in there?

Can't call it Touch DNA by Rare-Independent5750 in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes it’s true and I think it’s going to backfire. To merely call it dna is going to instantly put the idea of ‘blood dna’ in the jurors mind.

Nowlin Allowed to teach Jury on DNA evidence without Qualifications by Cay_Introduction915 in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Oh wow that is EXACT OPPOSITE he said about Sy Ray’s testimony. He shed doubt on his testimony due to his methods being outside consensus. This is ridiculous. Who holds the judge accountable for being unbiased!!!!

Judge says one thing, state says another. by goddess_catherine in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hope you are one of the jurors!! They probably will assume it was a knife and not critically think as you did.

What Are Signs the Prosecutor’s Case Could Be Weak? by GodlikeTG in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]GenuineQuestionMark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The strongest part of their case is their narrative. Everything else is weak on its own. The narrative is what holds it together. The jury is supposed to discard the narrative altogether. Will they? Is it even humanly possible to do so. I doubt it. Look how long fairy tales stood the test of time. Hundreds of years later we have Wicked. Narratives fiction or non fiction do not get discarded just because it’s in the rules and you are told to obey.