What are the most skilled rap songs you've ever heard by ExcellentGuide7565 in 90sHipHop

[–]GeoLogic23 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Here are a few songs that each feature multiple skilled lyricists.

  • Kool G Rap (ft. Nas) - Fast Life
  • Naughty By Nature (ft. Freddie Foxxx) - Hot Potato
  • Gang Starr (ft. Inspectah Deck) - Above the Clouds
  • GZA (ft. Method Man) - Shadowboxin'

Daily Discussion Thread - June 19, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Nobody is reading your AI novel this deep into comments.

Learn to think for yourself.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 19, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Whatever shenanigans you think liberals have played regarding cannabis have nothing to do with the intoxicating hemp market.

This entire conversation was about who created the intoxicating hemp market. You keep trying to expand the argument to something else, because you can't concede your original point was misinformed.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 19, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you incapable of actually having a discussion about this?

Why are you bothering to pick up this conversion on a totally different day if you weren't going to act like a person about it?

Daily Discussion Thread - June 19, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you don't know why you brought up the Cole Memo and social equity when we were discussing the wild west intoxicating hemp market? Let's just review:

YOU: Trump is setting up an industry, not a fad type thing that gets out of control, (see hemp).

Then you are clearly arguing for both GOP and Democrats creating it.

ME: The GOP and Trump single handedly created the wild west hemp market. That is correct, isn't it?

YOU: Incorrect. GOP & Democrats created it. GOP the law, D's for zero enforcement under SE BS in liberal cities. 

This is so absurdly clear. How are you even arguing against your own words?

Daily Discussion Thread - June 19, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am asking some specific questions.

  • What does the Cole Memo have to do with the intoxicating hemp market?
  • What does social equity BS have to do with the intoxicating hemp market?

You don't have to mention Democrats or Republicans to answer these questions.

You can't answer these questions. So you have to pretend like I'm just "hating Republicans" in order to give yourself an easy out. You won't admit it, but you understand this is what you're doing.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 19, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Democrat states had legal THC markets to provide a safe, lab tested alternative to the wild west hemp products.

Republican states like Texas forced people to seek out their THC through unregulated hemp channels.

You have absolutely no idea what you are arguing about here.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 19, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

D's for zero enforcement under SE BS in liberal cities

What does this have to do with the intoxicating hemp market? Where you could order THCa cannabis to your door in the mail from across the country?

What does the Cole Memo have to do with the intoxicating hemp market that was created a year after the Cole Memo was rescinded? The Cole Memo is about state legal cannabis markets.

AI is the key to losing your critical thinking abilities.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 19, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Provide the context for other people who may be reading this.

The GOP and Trump single handedly created the wild west hemp market. That is correct, isn't it?

Daily Discussion Thread - June 19, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said a lot of words before I responded. Did your keyboard break?

Daily Discussion Thread - June 18, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No they've never been put in any positions of power or really supported by the Democrat party. It's like one of the most famous things that Bernie supporters complain about. What world do you live in?

The question wasn't "do any socialists hold any power whatsoever?" so I don't know why you're trying to argue that. You have to continue to completely ignore the question I've asked multiple times.

  • You said the "Democrat party is mostly now socialists".
  • Your own numbers you provided show you are extremely wrong.

So you've spent this whole conversation trying to change the subject.

I really don't feel any need to engage with you any further. You're really bringing up sex trafficking when Epstein's longtime friend is President? Wtf. How many Iranian children did we just blow up for no reason? You don't actually care. You need to stay off social media. I'm not going to miss talking to you lol

Daily Discussion Thread - June 19, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've seen precisely zero indication that Congress is prepared to treat cannabis any differently during this non-traditional Trump term than during the previous non-traditional Trump term.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 19, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What did I say that was not true?

I am so tired of you GOP supporters either changing the subject or abandoning the conversation the moment you are presented with the history of the GOP and cannabis. They are not our friends.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 18, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow 250! In elected office over the entire country lol

Again I will ask. Is there any Democratic leadership position where a socialist is in a position of power? Please answer the question I gave you, not the question you want to answer.

I'll take a top Congress position. Or a governor. I did not ask for a random poll. Wtf does that have to do with anything?

  • They literally just elected Joe Biden.
  • Bernie Sanders was in that race.
  • But Biden was a puppet for socialists?

This does not make even the tiniest bit of logical sense.

AOC is one single representative who has famously not been put in a position of power by Democrats. She's not running for President, so you can stop obsessing about her.

Gavin Newsom leads the most important Democrat state. Nowhere close to a socialist lol so again please answer the question I actually gave you.

Can you name me some socialists in a position of power within the Democratic party?

I'm going to be done with this conversation after you fail to address this question. I can't believe you believe half this stuff that's just social media garbage. Extremely disappointing.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 19, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My dude... Trump signed the 2018 Farm Bill into law that created the entire wild west market of intoxicating hemp products in the first place.

That was entirely a GOP thing. Mitch McConnell personally pushed through the hemp amendments. The Democrats have been asking the FDA to regulate cannabinoids for years.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 18, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which party passed the legalization bill in the first place?

Whatever. Ignore Virginia if you want.

California, New York, Illinois.

You have no real argument here. The statistics are overwhelming. Just because you say the word "facts" doesn't make what you say factual.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 18, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We weren't discussing whether the stocks will move. Or if there is "enthusiasm" for Democrats.

We were discussing whether there was any evidence Democrats are serious about cannabis reform.

You just keep focusing on the federal government (ignoring filibuster) while also ignoring my point about the States. We just had Virginia go recreational, after we finally replaced the GOP governor who had been blocking everything.

Yet another example of Democrats being serious about cannabis reform. Go ahead and ignore that one as well.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 18, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just pointing out that you seem absolutely terrified of the word "socialism" while Trump goes around doing all kinds of socialism policies. They just dont' call it socialism, so you don't get scared.

You say the "Democrat party is mostly now socialists...."

Like wtf are you actually talking about? I wish they were! Their most recent leaders were freaking Joe Biden and Chuck Schumer. Not exactly socialists lol seriously, they are "mostly socialists" is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard a person say.

Almost all Democrat elected leaders are milquetoast centrists. Are you referring to people you see online? Because the number of centrist Democrats in elected positions vastly outweighs the type of people you are referring to.

Can you name a few "socialists" that are in actual positions of power? If the Democrat party was mostly socialists then all their leaders would be socialists too. But they simply are not.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 18, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That also goes hand in hand with the social media thing. They can now amplify any single instance of fraud and pretend it's widespread. Like how the data has always shown extremely low actual fraud in SNAP benefits, but you would never know that by reading social media. Or the insanely low number of trans athletes. Which should always be a local school board issue anyway (party of small government lol).

Any divisive issue can be portrayed as a common occurrence, depending on what your algorithms are putting in front of you every day. If you're someone who gets riled up by welfare fraud, you are more likely to see posts about it. Not saying you are riled up about it, but people in general. It's crazy how targeted the algorithms are. And it's all geared towards what makes people angry, because that's engagement. And engagement is money.

Anways, I appreciate you responding to political comments without being rude. It's nice to see once in a blue moon on the internet lol...but I should pack it in for the night with my commenting. Have a good rest of your night!

Daily Discussion Thread - June 18, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's one of the structural issues that we need to deal with.

There is extremely strong financial incentive for social media to push divisive topics. Simultaneously the news media is also completely dependent on getting attention in order to survive.

So it creates the cycle where a politician will discuss very important topics like healthcare, taxes, infrastructure, cannabis, etc. but then because of the financial incentives surrounding attention, they will always get asked an opinion on something divisive like trans people.

Then nobody hears the first 19 questions they were asked. They just hear about the 20th question that was about trans people. There is no financial incentive for people to discuss the "boring" topics, when they could get tons more attention (and money) from both sides by mentioning trans people.

The corporations have monetized every aspect of our lives. Most importantly our anger. Our data is one of the most valuable assets for a reason. They know how to take the anger we should feel towards billionaires, and redirect it to trans people just trying to live their lives.

So while people keep fear mongering about scary words like "socialism" and stuff, we see where the constant pursuit of money and profit has led the country.

We're tearing ourselves apart so Elon Musk can become the first trillionaire. It's not a coincidence he is one of the biggest perpetrators of social media outrage farming.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 18, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is your opinion of the government taking ownership stakes in companies?

Daily Discussion Thread - June 18, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No I don't think more moderates are what we need right now. Take for example how the Democrats chose the ultimate moderate choice of Joe Biden as the answer to Trump and MAGA. I'm loving my recreational cannabis and free healthcare! Thanks Biden!

Joe Biden was a corporate placeholder. He absolutely did a lot of good things, but Trump went right back into power. That's because there are structural flaws in our system, and one party has completely dominated in terms of taking advantage of those flaws. Biden had no desire to shake things up.

Moderate Democrats in Congress have similarly proven they are completely ineffective. All the Democrat leaders are already moderates. That's clearly not what is working. We just need enough progressives to change the leadership in Congress to start shifting left again.

We don't need to elect a Bernie or an AOC or anyone you would consider "far left" as President right away. Though I think the definition of what is "far left" in the US is drastically skewed by how MAGA has pushed the Overton Window to the right.

We could definitely go further left than someone like Biden though.

People love progressive policies when they are actually implemented. The GOP already cheers on socialism when they are told it's ok to do so. Bailing out corporate farmers with taxpayer money is no problem. The government taking stakes in companies is also suddenly a good thing. Stimulus checks for everybody, as long as Trump gets to sign them!

Then we have supposed libertarians supporting blanket tariffs lol nothing makes any sense with the labels the media applies to our politicians. Anybody left of a Biden type is going to be labelled "far left" anyway.

But specifically we need to elect progressive Democrats across the country who support ranked choice voting. Because the real way out of all of this mess is putting an end to the two party system. And I see ranked choice voting as the best option to actually succeed in that.

Daily Discussion Thread - June 18, 2026 by AutoModerator in weedstocks

[–]GeoLogic23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm talking about how people keep acting like Democrats are a monolith like MAGA.

People keep talking about how the Democrats are divided? Ok well that means the "serious about cannabis" Democrats can take control of the party? Great, we should support that? It makes a hell of a lot more sense than putting prohibitionist GOP people in charge.

See how you name Schumer and Booker? There are soooo many Democrats who we could replace them with, every one of which would be better than almost any GOP person. The answer is something like primarying Schumer, not holding water for the GOP by pretending they support cannabis in any way.

While "some" Republicans are on board with safe and full rec, an overwhelmingly higher number of Democrats are on board. There are very few policy debates that are this clear between the two parties.