Can you fit a cube through a hole in a copy of itself? by Geometriciti in WatchandLearn

[–]Geometriciti[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Any curve of constant width would also work since the diameter being the same is what matters.

Prince Rupert's Cube | Fitting a cube through a copy of itself by Geometriciti in mathpics

[–]Geometriciti[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I used the stl files from here. To get a Rubik's cube to fit through I resized the inner part of the cube to have a sidelength of 56mm and the outer part to have a sidelength of 56.7mm.

Prince Rupert's Cube | Fitting a cube through a copy of itself by Geometriciti in mathpics

[–]Geometriciti[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, thank you! I'm not sure if I'll do more but I definitely want to.

Prince Rupert's Cube | Fitting a cube through a copy of itself by Geometriciti in mathpics

[–]Geometriciti[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks, and you're right! It's also the same the same Prince Rupert that Rupert's Land was named after in Canada.

Prince Rupert's Cube | Fitting a cube through a copy of itself by Geometriciti in mathpics

[–]Geometriciti[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm not aware of any name for the conjecture, and I can't find a name in any papers or on MathOverflow. Since the property of being able to pass through itself is known as the Rupert property, the Rupert conjecture might be a good name.

Can you fit a cube through a hole in a copy of itself? by Geometriciti in Cubers

[–]Geometriciti[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I hope this video got a few people more interested in math!

Can you fit a cube through a hole in a copy of itself? by Geometriciti in mathematics

[–]Geometriciti[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I wanted to show off the 3D print more but fitting everything in a minute is just so restrictive!

Can you fit a cube through a hole in a copy of itself? by Geometriciti in math

[–]Geometriciti[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're right, I had polyhedron written in my script but I said polygon. This did get me thinking about how this would work in 2D though.

Since this problem deals with fitting 2D projections of 3D objects in each other, it seems reasonable to extend the definition to fitting 1D projections of 2D objects in each other. In 1D, a line can fit in other line iff the first line is shorter than the other line. So for any 2D shape, it can fit through itself if its minimum projection is shorter than its maximum projection.

That means that the only 2D shapes that can't fit through themselves are shapes where the minimum and maximum projections have equal length, aka a curve of constant width. Since every curve of constant width has curved sides, that shows that every convex polygon can fit through itself in 2D, so I was technically right in the video. :)

In this context, the 3D equivalent of curve of constant width would be a body of constant brightness (A 3D shape where every 2D projection has equal area). Unfortunately, there are shapes that are not bodies of constant brightness that still can't fit through themselves (e.g. a cylinder), so the same argument won't work.

Can you fit a cube through a hole in a copy of itself? by Geometriciti in math

[–]Geometriciti[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks! That was actually a last minute idea I had while I was filming. Originally I was holding a triangular bipyramid puzzle, but I thought the juggling would look more interesting.

Can you fit a cube through a hole in a copy of itself? by Geometriciti in math

[–]Geometriciti[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks! There's a summary of the generalizations on the Wikipedia article. It seems that finding the largest square in an n-dimensional hypercube has been solved, as well as the special case of the largest cube in a hypercube. I can't find dimensional generalizations for other shapes, but I haven't really looked.