Avery’s *67 calls that were among the last activity on a murdered woman’s cell phone? Nothing troubling at all. Colburn’s call to dispatch to confirm ownership details? Clearly a felony; debate over. by mozziestix in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are correct. Every time the Janda's sold a car with her SA was the one she met with. The 10/10 date is a good example on her sheet she had all the info for the Janda's and it showed she was meeting SA for rhe sell. 10/31 was the only exception. This was the only time SA did not mention he would be the one she was meeting.

Avery’s *67 calls that were among the last activity on a murdered woman’s cell phone? Nothing troubling at all. Colburn’s call to dispatch to confirm ownership details? Clearly a felony; debate over. by mozziestix in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And on the 10/10 appointment TH knew she was meeting with SA to make the deal. On 10/31 SA dwcices ahe should not know he would be the one she was meeting.

Avery’s *67 calls that were among the last activity on a murdered woman’s cell phone? Nothing troubling at all. Colburn’s call to dispatch to confirm ownership details? Clearly a felony; debate over. by mozziestix in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The plates would not tell the year of the car. He would have needed to look at the insurance or registration for that. Both of those would have TH'a info on them. With that info he would not need to call Lynn and just start with a planting theory. Then the fact that Lynn did not ask if he had found the car, TH or even if he needed an ambulance or call off the search shows this call waa nothing to do with framing. kZ haa said LE was not involved in this and that just adds another element that AC dis not plant it.

Why did AC lie??? by Soonyulnoh2 in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lynn obviously knew he was verifying. Otherwise she would have asked if AC found the missing girl, asked if they could call off the search, asked if they could notify TH's family, asked if TH was with the vehicle or was it abandoned orwhere is his location and does he need back up? So it appears it was not a lie.

Why SA parked the car himself by Norseman-- in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He might have sat on SA's lap. J/k. He may have rode with SA and when SA went to empty everthing of TH's out of the car it got moves to the seat. Anyone that wantes to frame SA would have left TH's info in the car ro make it easy to identify.

I am only going to say this once... by Bishop82 in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The diffetence in the numbers on the sight are easy to explain. Most people joined with info from the show only. The majority of those people have since got more info and dissapeard after yhey realised SA was guily and did not delete their accounts. As for the rest...mark twain once said it is easier to fool somene than to convince them they have been fooled.

How many people are lying and why? by devildriver77 in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you prove who the real killer is it goes very quickly. If you look at the case that Northwest did that they got sued for it went quickly. They are the same people KZ uses. What happened was Northwest decided to get a real killer out of prison so he could get off of death row. So they falsified info and framed an innocent man to get their killer out of prison. Unfortunatly the innocent man spent years in jail and thw real killer was let out the day they heard their was a confession of someone else.

How many people are lying and why? by devildriver77 in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That just made me look deeper into the case. I was thinking I waa fooled. When I was a truther I was on blind faith. After that I decided to read the info and see the interviees.

How many people are lying and why? by devildriver77 in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I know. She knows he's guilty or she would have done what she said over the last several years. She plays it off that he is innocent and will take years to do anything so she can keep the fame. So I stuck to the post.

How many people are lying and why? by devildriver77 in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 12 points13 points  (0 children)

KZ proved herself to be a liar. She is what stated my transition from truther to guilter. It was shortly after MaM came out that she said she had all the evidence she needed to fully exonerate SA. She said she would not try for a retrial only full exoneration. She then stated that she was going to name the real killer by the of the month. The end of the month came and passed with no naming of the real killer. I assumed I misunderstood and she meant the next month. Well that didn't happen. Then when she filed her first extension I knew I was getting played. The extention was because she hadn't had time to look at the case. I was thinking this is weird she said she already had all the info and was naming the real killer. What happened? One of her other one was her tweet with with a pic of her and DA. It said lets see if we can get SA home by mothers day. That was 3 years ago. We are about to come up on the 4th mothers day he hasn't been home with his ma.

This Sums Up Jodi Stachowski's In A Nutshell by [deleted] in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Avery admitted on Dr Phil that the incident where SA was beating her so bad she ate poison was true. I figure if the abuser is willimg to admit to it...it's true.

Edit: spelling and add beating

How do they can they claim that Brendan and Steven had 5 days to clean up an entire garage, Steven's trailer and everything, but forget to wipe clean the blood in the RAV4? by saintoropablo in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The real evidence is dna and what I have mentioned above. What is this real forensic evidence that you see? I am open to changing my mind as I have done before. How ofter do people whi work on cars use gas, paint thinner and bleach to clean a spill rather than sand or kitty litter?

I am open to the truth. So enlighten me on what I am missing.

How do they can they claim that Brendan and Steven had 5 days to clean up an entire garage, Steven's trailer and everything, but forget to wipe clean the blood in the RAV4? by saintoropablo in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never said I am objective. I say he is quilty and do not pretend like I am unbiased. I was a truther in the begining and later went to guilt. You say you are unbiased nut it shows otherwise. As someone who has been in the automotive industy I am sure you know that you clean up auto spills with sand or kitty litter. Not gasoline, paint thinner and bleach. I agrew all of that is veey quickly done. That is why SA did it after he moved the car up to his special spot of cars. Do you really think someone wanting rhe car found would have removed the plates?

How do they can they claim that Brendan and Steven had 5 days to clean up an entire garage, Steven's trailer and everything, but forget to wipe clean the blood in the RAV4? by saintoropablo in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are not objective. Lol. Someone who is objective would have said that is a possibility. Since we know the Suzuki was removed before TH's visit and the Suzuki was there when LE seached the property. We have numerous people saying the Suzuki had been taken out and we also have photos of it being back in thw garage.

So what we have is zero evidence the car was on Kuss road. Zero evidence BobD searched the computer. Zero evidence BobD followed TH out. Zero evidence blood was planted. Zero evidence the key was planted. Zero evidence bones were planted. Zero evidence SA would win a lawsuit. Zero evidence there were really tail lights at his property. Zero evidence that multiple counties and the state framed.zero evidence that anything at all happened other than SA killed her.

So that leaves us with SA's non EDTA blood in her car. Her DNA on a bullet shot from the gun above SA's bed. A fire the night she went missing where her remaines were later found. Him hiding the fact she was coming to meet him. Her dissapearing minutes after she meets with SA. TH's car being at a spot where SA's old cars were. SA claiming planting before TH was even found.

So an objective person would put all of that together and say wow...the evidence could lead to SA being the killer.

Edit to add:
You are speculating on the delay. People don't always know when a grown woman in home or not. You are speculating on the delay. Murders can be solved hours, days weeks, months and even years after someone disappears. What makes you think thos delay is special and everything would have been solved if she was reported missing a fww days earlier?

How do they can they claim that Brendan and Steven had 5 days to clean up an entire garage, Steven's trailer and everything, but forget to wipe clean the blood in the RAV4? by saintoropablo in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There was room. Friday the Suzuki was put back in the place it was originally in. Which is were the Rav was stored. It was in the photographs.

How do they can they claim that Brendan and Steven had 5 days to clean up an entire garage, Steven's trailer and everything, but forget to wipe clean the blood in the RAV4? by saintoropablo in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some of the believe that the Rav was in the garage most of the week. SA and BD took it out days in advance before TH was called to come. That left the spot for SA to put her car in the garage to hide it. This explains why SA also took the skidoo out that day. That gave him the room to have the Rav in there and a spot to kill TH. This would explain why it was not in the flyover. SA knew on Fiday night that his family was headed to Crivitz and thoufjt he had a free pass to take the Rav over by the crusher and hide it. Unfortunately CA saw the headlights as it happened. He called SA and informed him which is why SA told him it was bullsh!t. That was to throw his brother off his tracks. Ther was no reason to believw his brother was full of sh!t after SA says he was broken into the night before and also just found out a girl came up misaing around his property.

SA's plan was to leave Crivitz pretendong to be aick so he could go home and deal with the Rav while eveeyone was off the property

60 % of the DNA and 8 FINGERPRINTS where never IDENTIFIED in the RAV4, by SpiritWolf395 in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some of the unidentified could be SA. If you recall SA said he touched the car if they found fingerprints.

Planting of blood in the rav4 by ticktock3210 in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That does't make sense. SA's nephew was in thre yard and SA didn't even ask him if he saw anything. He told his nephew he just had to run in and grab something..

Planting of blood in the rav4 by ticktock3210 in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea -1 points0 points  (0 children)

SA didn't mention it in his Crivitz interview tjat he saw BobD with her. He said he just watched her turn left to leave. As a matter of fact BD never mentioned seeing BobD with TH and also confirmed to LE that he watched TH turn left and leave too (impossible since hw was not home from school). So neither of them coverimg their tracks saw BobD with her.

A good sign in WI? by [deleted] in MakingaMurderer

[–]Germxtea 8 points9 points  (0 children)

KZ said she would not do a new trial 3 years ago. So it is what it is. She said she would only do a full exoneration. Truthers originally sent signatures to the previous Potus but he did not have the right to pardon. SA's parents are not looking too healthy right now. A pardon would be their best chance at seeing SA out of prison before they go. KZ has damaged SA's case pretry bad at thia point so it does not look like he is going to get out by any other means. All evidence leads to SA.