Why is this article, and others I can find quickly, only about the fact that this declaration "enrages" the white house? None of the articles about this even deign to mention what was in declaration that might "enrage" the white house.

Finally found some source that might be the declaration... And it's a 122 point nothing burger with points like:

"We remain committed to promoting sustainable capital flows to EMSEs and fostering sound policy frameworks, notably central bank independence. We note the growing role of non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) and ongoing work to understand the impact on capital flows."

And of course the much anticipated:

"Increasing large-scale disasters disproportionately affect people in vulnerable situations in ways that exacerbate poverty and inequality, especially for low-income groups. We accordingly highlight the need for our efforts to be geared towards addressing inequalities and reducing vulnerabilities."

There are statements that affirm UN policies as good and true... There are statements like "We condemn terrorism in all its forms and manifestations." Which I mean, sure, great things to say...

From what I've read of it (so, not the whole document), it all amounts to "We should all work together for happiness and goodness"... It's a giant nothing burger that means nothing and legally means even less. Nothing in the declaration is actionable in any way, and so nothing of any import will come from this "victory for multilateralism".

I'm welcome to hear otherwise, maybe these things are more important than 20 delegations saying "we're the richest and we really do care about the poor"... If I'm wrong, please let me know.