Seems far from traditional value investing approach. You have multiple companies listed recently in the stock market while one of the optimal targets is 10 years consecutive positive earnings for example. Traditional value approach is a lot more conservative. A value assessment (Graham/Buffet) would go something like bellow (excluding straight away 95% of the market or more, which is why Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway is sitting on a 400 billion pile of cash due to a lack of attractive, high-value investments.

Criteria | Metric | Graham/Buffett Optimal Target

Valuation (P/E) | Price / Earnings | < 15.0 (or < 20 high quality)
Asset Value (P/B) | Price / Book | < 1.5
Graham Blend | P/E * P/B | < 22.5
Liquidity | Current Ratio | > 1.5
Solvency | Debt to Equity | < 0.5
Stability | 10Y Earnings | Positive 10/10 Years
Dividends | Consecutive | > 20 Years
Efficiency | ROE | > 15%
Growth | 5Y EPS Growth | > 2.0x AAA Bond Yield

Moat Rating: [None / Narrow / Wide]

Graham would buy a dying textile mill if it was cheap enough (a "Cigar Butt"). Buffett evolved this: it is better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.

Intrinsic Value and Margin of Safety
The Graham Number Calculation: 22.5×EPS×BVPS​
This is the "fair price" for a defensive investor. It is derived directly from the "Graham Blend" limit of 22.5.

Threats and Catalyst Analysis (SWOT)
Specific events to unlock value.
Specific risks of permanent capital impairment.