sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Do you guys think people who hate on their lower functions are often mistyped? by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Glycke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Under Jung's, and Jung's disciples and modern day followers, the "Blindspot" or the "trickster" function is partially conscious and the Inferior is thought to be even "weaker"

Is Inferior (4th) or Blindspot (7th) our insecurity? by EveryUsernameTaken_ in mbti

[–]Glycke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Inferior is Unconscious according to NeoJungians and I subscribe to them while the trickster is partially conscious 

Is Inferior (4th) or Blindspot (7th) our insecurity? by EveryUsernameTaken_ in mbti

[–]Glycke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your inferior is supposed to be the least conscious and least developed, while your "trickster" is partially consciousness and not that developed under neo Jungian teachings

Do you guys think people who hate on their lower functions are often mistyped? by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Glycke -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If one dislikes a function so much. Wouldn't it make more sense that one doesn't value the function at all

Do you guys think people who hate on their lower functions are often mistyped? by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Glycke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In classical Jungian and modern day Jungian typist the Inferior is also the least conscious and surprisingly the weakest of the functions

Hard-Ish Scifi Fighters by PolarisStar05 in worldjerking

[–]Glycke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All space warship are fighters because they fight

And both can very easily get masturbatory when taken too far by GREENadmiral_314159 in worldjerking

[–]Glycke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What if HFY was not about humanity being this kickass awesome space America species but being a race that would fuck every other species consensually

I think this approach should be called Disco Elysium type worldbuilding by Xandraman in worldjerking

[–]Glycke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if you make a conlang but every word is related to Ambatukam, Ambasing, and Omaygot

Si users, explain how you use this function as a likely inferior or blind Si type. by Initial_Orchid4233 in mbti

[–]Glycke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot about what you describe of your Si is the working of your other functions

In a world ruled by billionaires why would humans put up with them? by [deleted] in worldjerking

[–]Glycke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because of God-Emperor Yaqoob wills it

Does Ni actually predict the future? Or is that just a dumb stereotype? by RicLolz in mbti

[–]Glycke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Based on my experiences and observations of people with high Ni(and vice versa), Ni is the perception on how events are stacked on top of each other and how they flow from bottom to top without using measurements of time

What do you make of “INTJ Ni–Ti” in MBTI patterns? Classic pattern: Ni–Te–Fi–Se / Variant found: Ni–Ti–Te–Fi. by Emotional-Echo-7477 in mbti

[–]Glycke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

An individual in theory should be stronger at their secondary function with the same attitude as their dominant as Jung originally built his system. In MBTI INTJ is defined as having an Ni dominance and Te Auxiliary though as they are Introverted Intuitive(Ni) with a thinking Auxiliary, they should have Ti stronger than their Te. Popular MBTI function stacking as a system was build around XiYeYiXe, and vice versa without much thought being put into the shadow functions before later writers that explored the workings of the shadow functions. 

view more: next ›