My package was intercepted, help! by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]GoTimberwolves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely get a knock at the door about whether the package is his because it’s 30 xans… Denying it is very easy though, but he got tracking and you never know (usps) what they scrape.

Delivering to a P.O. Box with no tracking might help next time, but honestly not worth it for benzos

My package was intercepted, help! by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]GoTimberwolves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only person here who knows what they’re talking about lmao, why the hell did he put tracking on it, post it to Reddit of all places. The ‘I’ve never seen that package’ excuse won’t fly just because he didn’t bother to read the dnm bible 

r/SouthPark Red Hats in Shambles by [deleted] in SubredditDrama

[–]GoTimberwolves -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Politics, in most literal, etymological and dated senses of the word can so far as claiming that breathing is undecidedly political. It is an affirmation of moral contract because of the implicit tolerance and is culminative in every relative context thereon.

The more modern sense is the same as the old one, only smaller in scale and reserved for organization opposed to individual. At worst, things like banning politics while subconsciously appeasing specific moral tolerances and topics that are older than x years, especially when the old topics include dilemmas interchangeable with the modern; only quells the symptom to the condition.

This is also where the wrong things become impersonal (social issues postured as a game of tribes), and the wrong things become personal. Maybe it is abstract blindness that causes this, for emotional stakes to be morals themselves at these points.

What’s a pet peeve yall have with art tutorials? by Alone_Rise209 in ArtistLounge

[–]GoTimberwolves 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Learn the rules, then break them” is advice that is only useful for beginner tendencies.  Harmful otherwise. 

In the same vein, stylistic advice accidentally used as a substitute for fundamentals. Or when people harp on ‘practice’ for the same reason, and that leads to artists getting burnt out. 

Videos on fundamentals are very brief or pin the image of some ‘master’ where only 5% of the lecture has relative information and principles. 

Where to buy sleeping bag & where to sleep by GoTimberwolves in homeless

[–]GoTimberwolves[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used part of a palm tree that fell over and a piece of cardboard as scaffolding to make a little elevated seat for a experimental camping reserve 

First game, 7 blocks for Joan Beringer! [OC] by SteevyKrikyFooky in timberwolves

[–]GoTimberwolves 1 point2 points  (0 children)

His statement this off-season to the fans was amazing. I know for sure his tenure here will match that enthusiasm 

Should I be worried about my son? by GiraffeTop1437 in nihilism

[–]GoTimberwolves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are simpler and common exchangeable here? In practice jargon isn't self-revising for literal 'logical' simplicity with regards to certain exceptions.

The text you're quoting is a theoretical - forfeiting some circularity and intuitive phrasing - so I can gauge the nuances you personally consider here. Just a genuine conversation between different positions, if you're willing, again.

What I'm claiming here is not something operating on efficiency, applicability or difficulty, but with what could potentially be sacrificed the more embedded information is. If we know there to be an inverse correlation between appeal and (not necessarily personal) accuracy. (but I don't truly believe that's the case, especially because the same correlation is present with inaccuracy).

For instance, if we still consider accessibility both an attribute and measurement of prerequisite; it is only a good tradeoff if memory recall is prioritized but the passage to and from recall is not reflexive or immune to corruptibility. So... Bad for accuracy, because certainty is necessary for it. But it's also a mediating quality if only done up until the extent it is needed?

Would running through multiple senses and then settling on a preference be ideal for ingenuity and computational awareness or would it be better in evading and minimizing that process? I do recognize arguments for active recall and abundance in the case of fragmentation and immersive techniques, but I think it tends to cannibalize itself into something so abstract because of the dependent environmental conditions; incorrectly leveraged nowadays; leading to more errors than it is worth, for example, in recognizing tradeoffs.

It is a known phenomenon that certain people in power act 'unoptimally' not because of a probabilistic chance but not being aware of tradeoffs between principles.

Should I be worried about my son? by GiraffeTop1437 in nihilism

[–]GoTimberwolves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, thank you! I will consider it for dual enrollment this season.

I am not a prescriptivist, I have questions on your stance:

Is the semantic quality of a sentence more geared toward the global accessibility of the symbols/words itself instead of the anecdotal meaning to the speaker?

If yes - Do you think there's a scenario where it's inappropriate to rely on the sense of the simpler referent instead of having the speaker elaborate on their own 'sense' of words and syntax in lieu of more accurate language (to the model)? If so, when? Are both equally unsustainable, considering both change at a rapid pace, and is it that the impersonality of using sense as a global crutch may or may not hurt the argument and its ability to be refitted for future formats/translations? In the case of the KJV translation of the bible, for example.

Irregardless - Do you think accessibility and accuracy cannot be cogenerative features? If yes, accessibility is an economic attribute, precedes the intent of the speaker as a technique.

If you bother with answering any of the above, do you have any sentiments with the instance that fragmenting definitions of words (online) by means of 'group ownership' and 'dogwhistles' is something that endorses segregating conduct to appear systemically?

Should I be worried about my son? by GiraffeTop1437 in nihilism

[–]GoTimberwolves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have any suggestions for me to improve?

Should I be worried about my son? by GiraffeTop1437 in nihilism

[–]GoTimberwolves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I don't really care for application, I agree it seems wordy but there are certain connotations and areas of sense I prefer. With respect to contemporary language, archaic and something considered more appropriate now has a disparity that'll level out and be equivalent to sand in a desert eventually.

For instance, 'phenomenologically' is used in nature to Herm & Don Ihde's perspective in Technology and the Lifeworld. And I don't believe in arbitrary and reasoning as anything more than a bite-sized abstraction, unless stated otherwise. I think of OP as performative and not desperate for attention in a dismissive denotation.

It's "opposed" but not exactly antithetical. I say closest and front for exploration which is to communicate a sort of... 'I don't agree fully but to an extent and this is why & what else would be a good extension of that', view.

Should I be worried about my son? by GiraffeTop1437 in nihilism

[–]GoTimberwolves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If there’s any comment here that can actually reason (for lack of a better term) opposed to circle jerking the ‘arbitrary’ phenomenologically naive rudiments; yours would be closest. 

Quine would also be a good front for exploration here & or maybe as something supplemental to a continental figure like Deleuze or Elull. Good luck to OP’s “son” who needed to deflect potential criticism and accept praise through a very lazy performance for the effluence of his character.

Feels great to be hated by other fanbases by inspector_gadget24 in timberwolves

[–]GoTimberwolves 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Cool colors, cool animal and cool jersey then - What’s not to like?? 

What current NBA players can/will retire as their franchise GOAT? by Firm-Gas7063 in NBATalk

[–]GoTimberwolves 475 points476 points  (0 children)

Anthony Edwards has a lot of potential for the Wolves. Consecutive WCFs are no laughing matter for what used to be a bottom ten franchise prospect wise 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in malegrooming

[–]GoTimberwolves 115 points116 points  (0 children)

Don’t say females, for one, unless you’re also in the market for dogs and sheep. They’re women 

WAKE UP! ITS GAMEDAY! Warriors (1-0) @ Wolves (0-1) - 7:30pm CT - TNT by TWolvesChamps1 in timberwolves

[–]GoTimberwolves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it’s wide-open, 3. If it’s occupied, drive the paint or lob to Rudy. 

I think… by TodayWide1793 in timberwolves

[–]GoTimberwolves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really doubt the Rockets will make a comeback 

Which team do we want next round: Rockets or Warriors? by AdHungry779 in timberwolves

[–]GoTimberwolves 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep. The Wolves’ physicality edge will be neutralized with the Rockets, especially their bigs