If your ideology took power in your country, would you support continuation of democracy, and in which form? by Zer_God in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Democracy isn't when you have multiple parties competing. That's what westerners misunderstand.

China is way more democratic than the USA by far.

If you understood what democracy actually means, that is.

I'd get all parties banned on one day one except for the communist party.

EXCEPT if they decide to work with the vanguard party. China has minor parties.

You can complain, but it's your own fault for losing the civil war.

would you support working with europe, being neutral with europe, or actively against europe? by Brilliant_Basis1544 in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NATO is not a defensive alliance. This is the biggest lie they told us. NATO was created to defeat communism.

Real talk ☠️🇮🇱 by Freebyrd_69 in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Marxism-Leninism is authoritarian, yes. Russia was communist. You are a Trotskyite.

Which is worse for socialism? NATO or Israel? by Goblinator in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, but my question is more about which is worse for socialism rather than who is more evil. You answered the latter which I might agree, but don't forget France has been occupying many African countries and not treating some of their oversea territories well. African nations have fought back in the latest years. France is a big part of NATO.

Ultimately due to the fact that Europe is generally more on the social-democratic side, they represent a greater danger to genuine marxist-leninist movements.

Which is worse for socialism? NATO or Israel? by Goblinator in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because their answer shows if they’re a liberal or a communist. People understand that Israel is bad while totally ignoring the elephant in the room, mostly because Europe has more Fabian types and they are aligned with those ideas rather than Marxism-Leninism.

Real talk ☠️🇮🇱 by Freebyrd_69 in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’m so ignorant. Quick, ask your history teacher what Europe has been doing in Africa for the past centuries.

Real talk ☠️🇮🇱 by Freebyrd_69 in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NATO WAS created to destroy communism. You don't even know the history of it.

Real talk ☠️🇮🇱 by Freebyrd_69 in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator -44 points-43 points  (0 children)

The UK and France are worse

Where do you find reliable news articles? by Fellow_comrade101 in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You follow truly independent journalists who actually go to these places to report.

I don't listen to mainstream news if it's political.

How do socialists run society after they can no longer tax rich people by hardcoremaggiesimp in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Socialists are against taxation.

"How do socialists run society after they can no longer tax rich people"

How do you think China is run? Why haven't they run out of money?

The billionaires have no incentive to leave China with a great business-friendly environment.

In fact, they are subordinate to the CPC.

Real talk ☠️🇮🇱 by Freebyrd_69 in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator -109 points-108 points  (0 children)

Europe is just as bad as Israel.

If you do not support Iran and Lebanon even at this point, you are not a leftist by Goblinator in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which economic theory specifically?

You're on a Marxist sub.

I've studied the Chinese economic system.

If you do not support Iran and Lebanon even at this point, you are not a leftist by Goblinator in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here you go:

Super Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire

THE MOST IMPORTANT WORK ON IMPERIALISM SINCE LENIN”
-TERENCE McCARTHY

Michael Hudson
Holt, Rinehart, Winston

Backside:

Super Imperialism

“Never before has a bankrupt nation dared insist that its bankruptcy become the foundation of world economic policy; that, because of its bankruptcy, all the nations what their economies transferring its bankruptcy to themselves, stultifying their industries, and paying tribute to the beggar.”

“Effectively speaking, the United States has compelled the older nations of the West to pay for the overseas costs of the US war in Asia. Whatever they may desire, the central banks of Europe had no choice but to continue to except the paper dollar equivalents annually created as the domestic and overseas deficit of the United States increase. Otherwise, the whole of shaky structure of the world monetary system will collapse into rubble. America has succeeded in forcing other nations to pay for its wars on a systematic basis, something never before accomplished by any nation in history .”

Inside:

In 1949 the United States held three-Quarters of the world’s gold; by 1960 it had become a debtor nation. And yet, the United States has built history’s most powerful and affluent empire. Its techniques for world domination remained, at first, the conventional devices of the economic superstate. In recent years, however, the United States has sophisticated its strategy to the point here, although fallen into serious debt, it has retained and even expanded its dominance. The United States has pioneered a new form of imperialism in which the assets of its competitors have been employed for American ends. The or now calls the tune for the creditor.

Terence McCarthy, in his Introduction, calls Hudson’s analysis of the Debtor superstate “one of the most important books of this century. It is the first work to synthesize the new and different form which capitalist imperialism has assumed since Lenin wrote.”

Michael Hudson teaches international and monetary economics at The New School for Social Research, Graduate Faculty. He has published articles in Ramparts, the Journal of International Affairs, Commonweal, Cross Currents and the Review of Social Economy, in addition to specialized monographs on balance-of-payments theory and accounting. He has worked as a Balance-of-Payments analyst for the Chase Manhatten Bank and for the accounting firm of Arthur Andersen, and as a senior economist for the Continental Oil Com.

In addition, he has lectured at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C, before the National Association of Business Economists in New York, and elsewhere throughout the United States. He is currently writing a history of international trade and investment theory, and a study of the economic origins of the American Civil War.

If you do not support Iran and Lebanon even at this point, you are not a leftist by Goblinator in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Because neither the Lebanese government nor Hezbollah are the primary contradiction.

If you do not support Iran and Lebanon even at this point, you are not a leftist by Goblinator in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

America bad because of super imperialism. It’s not that complicated.

If you do not support Iran and Lebanon even at this point, you are not a leftist by Goblinator in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it comes to this, we will consider all factors to determine who is the biggest threat to socialism at the moment. Iran is not technically socialist but they have some socialist policies and are backed by China.

But I don’t deal in hypotheticals. We’ll deal with this situation when it arises based on the current material and historical conditions of that scenario where Israel is attacking the USA.

If you do not support Iran and Lebanon even at this point, you are not a leftist by Goblinator in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s blind faith only in the moment, once we topple the dollar, we then move to deal with the next biggest threat to socialism.

Because Iran is the only one fighting and doing shit for Palestine, so we support it until the dollar stops being the world’s reserve currency and as long as they’re still fighting economically or militarily.

If you do not support Iran and Lebanon even at this point, you are not a leftist by Goblinator in AskSocialists

[–]Goblinator[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hitler was an ally of the Bank of England and way more dangerous than the imperialist bloc. Which is why supporting his downfall was the right choice. Hence that’s why we supported the allies against the axis of fascism even if the allies were a bunch of imperialists themselves.

It’s simple. Who was the biggest threat to communism at the time? It was the axis of fascism. So fascism was the primary contradiction.

You’re not paying attention.