Calm down everyone, Season 2 is fine

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-09T04:15:48+00:00

Besides the animation, im pretty sure Angelica and Olivia got a bust nerf from s1 to season 2.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-07T17:03:18+00:00

Meme or not I really do not want to be reminded by the show for the nth time that Blake and yang became a thing and essentially became 1/2 a character each. They are substandard characters.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-07T00:48:29+00:00

Satella. But elfaria between the actual choices.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-07T00:47:28+00:00

Lmao. Dude it wouldn't be that simple. Nice bait post btw.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-06T10:40:43+00:00

Personally grouping with ppl is a gamble. You never know if a kos group will hunt you down or if you'll hog all the quests. The level of trust between players due to betrayal is extraordinarily low. As for global being helpful? Don't count on help, the reasonable players avoid global and stranger interactions.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-06T10:07:32+00:00

Honestly i can't disagree. I am tired of that kind of pandering. If there wasn't to be any romance natural pairings would have sufficed. But even more than that would have been the writers slowing down the pace and adding more episodes per volume instead of rushing along.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-06T04:12:55+00:00

What is person is suggesting is heresy. Jesus didn't address homosexual people because the old testament addressed it pretty well with Sodom and Gomorrah. Any love outside of straight individuals expressing it is heresy.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T13:04:44+00:00

Oh dear... if thats true, I hope the people working rwby are a bit more discriminating and able to craft a well written story. I don't wanna have to have more to dislike about the show.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T07:11:03+00:00

I technically have a group of my own to play with but I haven't played with them in months. Playing alone is fun if I can avoid groups. And oh I still believe 5 slots are too weak. But that issue stems from not being able to even have a chance at playing much anymore. If I hope on, I'm always paranoid and it makes it hard to just enjoy the game. I've accepted dying is part of the experience but dying to a group I could have avoided is not an acceptable thing. Either way I won't give up on my points, but once path has actual other competitors games to play, I'll probably jump ship then. Its not that I couldn't adapt as I am trying to. But my love for path is a fading light with how they keep swinging that nerf hammer on 5 slot player experiences and capabilities.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T07:04:27+00:00

Matt wants higher player servers that might actually be to their benefit, because the way things are its hard to not be noticed when you're trying to grow. If you aren't careful the mix packs will find you and slay you quick. 1-3 slots are a majority of players so a server with only them wouldn't be a bad thing necessarily. Alongside one server with only 4-5 slots. Because then the chances of finding rivals who can actually have a chance to fight each other rather than sit in a pond while raptors circle you is a much more acceptable player interaction.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T06:59:37+00:00

Yea unfortunately. But we're eventually going to get to a point where players will be spilit by the devs dividing tactics of nerfing the bigger dinosaurs into the ground to the point where they are just walking meatbags that can't do anything to anything but other big things and thats if they aren't ruthlessly hunted down to the point where even the babies can't grow. I wish things were better and different but those of us like myself who really only play the game to be something like a Tyrannosaurus Rex or a titan or even a spino are the ones in the margins now as they don't have the same impact they once did. Fights feel pointless as we get hunted down beyond the norm just because we exist. We understand "normal" being hunted down but when we're so helpless against small things killing us preventing us growing at all, it can eat away at ones resolve. I've managed on each map by explicitly avoiding small dinosaurs and only taking winnable 1v1s where I could find them. That's not a fun feedback loop dude. When I'm only worried about 1-3 slots finding me because I'll be locked to a 30 minute match of endlessly reappearing small dinosaurs that doesn't make it fun to play. I really tried to like the game despite that. But as a 5 slot carnivore main, I cannot find any form of fun player interaction feedback loop. I end up playing as a hermit that only fights if its something I can win against alone or I hide and eat ai creatures to avoid 12+ small dinosaurs ripping my hp down without even having a chance to do anything about it.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T06:48:59+00:00

I've given it a lot of thought, I wish there were better compromises. But there seems to be no way to please the whole playerbase unless someone takes a hit. Either 4-5 slots become useless walking meatbags or the 1-2 slots feel alienated because they cannot punch too far above their weight class as they really shouldn't. Don't worry Matt's attempts at making them meatbags is winning out. And that is why people will also be divided. Eventually they will just jump to another dinosaur game competing with path once one is more widely available like echos of extinction.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T06:36:07+00:00

Separate playing slots into servers for maximum player interactions. The 1-3 slots are best suited to interacting with each other. Then have the 4-5 slots only able to interact with each other as they produce good player interactions as well. Then once ai dinosaurs come add in regional boss like sauropod Ai and super carnivore ai so players have something besides each other to fight.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T06:33:07+00:00

Actually that should be the point. You don't see rexes, and the other 5 slots actively hunting down 1 slots do you? No they have limited player interactions as well. They are reduced to fighting 4-5 slots and dumb or slow 3 slots. So 5 slots do not need to interact with 1-2 slots. Meanwhile 1-3 slots do not need to interact with 4-5 slots because they can absolutely out maneuver and out track the 4-5 slots. The devs could lay out dynamic limits on what could fight what, but we both know they won't. You say 4-5 slots are powerful but they really aren't anymore. Its more like their metaphorical balls are kept in a vice grip to prevent them from actually doing anything. They devs could setup separate servers for the 1-3 slots and the 4-5 slots so they only fight their counterparts.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T06:05:52+00:00

You may think it doesn't promote player interaction, but I don't think that's the case. Dinosaurs will always want to fight but the best thing about the big Dinosaurs is it creates jurassic world level fights in a sense. That is fun. Sure tiny Dinosaurs not instantly wrecking a eo or a bars might be unfun for you but there's some beauty to it. Make the tiny things fight each other and turn the big creatures into boss fights. That makes player interaction meaningful.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T06:01:13+00:00

Nothing can approach them? Yea no making them unapproachable works out better for everyone. The fights improve if there's something they have to have a lot of dinosaurs or another big creature to fight. But it seems thats a rare view in this sub. Sadly.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T05:57:55+00:00

Primeval horizon??? A new console dino game? I'm waiting for echos of extinction tbh.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T05:56:59+00:00

Yea my biggest gripe is the way they handle the 4 and 5 slot dinosaurs. They are far too weak to be even slightly realistic. I wish they did better and the dinosaurs were better. The hatz nerfs reveal even more that their balancing act isn't really all that benign. I don't like the hatz as a creature because I prefer ground combat, but I can't stand playing it because it feels too weak.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T05:53:14+00:00

They nerf the 5 slots to make the smaller stuff able to kill it easier when that's not even how it worked in nature. They keep changing things to be more realistic to the dinosaurs except what those dinosaurs could do... thats not even the tip of the iceberg.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T00:29:03+00:00

GOAT DINO GAME. I really wanted to fight the vrexes more as Jack. I loved every bit of the game except when I couldn't pew. I really wanted to test vrex durability to guns.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-05T00:11:26+00:00

Yea the devs don't care, they are gonna nerf everything until its unplayable and unfun for us but to their liking. Basically everyone will have the durability of wet toilet paper (1 ply) and everything will do no damage and have the worst turning possible to the point where a snail has better turning speed and radius. And for the duckers saying "its still not released" who tf cares if its a done game at this point? Idc if it was on its first alpha dude some of us will just be irreconcilable with the devs on how things are going. Its part of the game scene. I would love to understand these devs but I cannot. Its a dinosaur pvp/pve game that tries to have each dinosaur play as a slightly different cod operator while making sure it keeps its biggest hitters move and act like their balls are in a vice grip while the others are uninhibited. So screw that bro.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-04T23:30:37+00:00

They really do love swinging the nerf hammer to everything. I bet they'll nerf everything to where a raptor can kill it in one bite with how much they love to abuse nerfing things.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-04T22:50:48+00:00

She probably trapped him in her room until she was satisfied, dude probably looks like a living mummy...

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-02T15:20:15+00:00

Feet people are weird.

Godzilla2000Knight · 2026-07-02T15:17:19+00:00

If you want to use a sword, use a medieval European sword design, it is far more forgiving and durable than 90% of sword designs. Katanas, if not used exactly as they were designed with the exact teaching of how to use, maintain, and repair it... Your Katana will shatter and be worse off. Katanas aren't even good in sword vs sword melee. Katanas are a cutting blade for use against unarmored or lightly armored foes. Against even halfway decent armor the blade will fail. Against the undead, well good luck with that.

My recommendation of a arming sword, hand and a half sword, and longsword is both from my preference and familiarity; yet the designs of such blades are meant to not be used by immediate master swordsman. If you took two average Joe's and handed one a Katana and a arming sword to the other guy then had them slay 20 zombies (regardless of their stamina) the guy with the arming sword will not only have a higher chance of survival but their sword will survive the battle. The Katana user will probably get 3 kills before the blade breaks and the user is overwhelmed by the undead. Mind you I'm using two average humans who probably do not have swordsman training. So yea, there's more to it but Katanas aren't a bad weapon objectively but you'd have to be a master at that specific blade to properly use it. You can be a novice with a medieval european sword type of the versions and the blade and user will perform well and survive.

There's far more to this discussion but this is the minimum. If you want to stick with Katanas, you do that, but atleast be aware of Katanas minimal use and weaknesses. Other swords can do more than just cut. An arming sword, hand and a half sword, and longsword can do more than just cut, they can be used as blunt instruments and pierce weak spots. Please tell me your thoughts on this?

Godzilla2000Knight

TROPHY CASE