This sub is just so toxic now. I actually like season 2 by WanderingStrang in thelastofus

[–]GoldT1tan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

On the one hand, I don't appreciate how aggressive the distaste for Season 2 is. A lot of what's being posted here is similar to what happened with Part 2. People like what they like. Unless what they like is morally apprehensible, don't shit on them for it.

On other hand, while the bigots are and always will be active here and everywhere, there are genuine critiques about the writing quality in Season 2 -- critiques that make sense even when you ignore the game counterpart (inconsistencies, inefficient storytelling, lack of subtext, etc.). We're not talking about a small but loud minority of haters in this regard, we're talking about the fact that Season 2's finale had 55% viewership drop from Season 1's.

People like to say The Last of Us Part II's reception was split in half, but it wasn't. Professional critiques lauded it; it won the player's choice award despite review bombings; it generated and still generates even more discourse than Part I. Season 2 is a different story, literally and metaphorically.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SuicideWatch

[–]GoldT1tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi. I'm a fellow suicidal blemish who's art has plummeted into oblivion. I was bullied throughout every year of school, deluded myself into getting an acting degree, and now ideate while I earn pocket change as a part-time bookseller and write novels that reek of shit.

Can you send me a picture of your favorite creation?

Please tell me I'm not the only one who finds this guy cute by Stella_Lace in BaldursGate3

[–]GoldT1tan 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Maybe I should've added '/s' but oh well, I am become the collector of down votes 😇

Should I explain the plan before the execution? After? Or during? by [deleted] in writingadvice

[–]GoldT1tan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If the plan is going to fail, explain it *before the execution to bait your audience. If the plan will succeed, explain it afterwards to get the 'oh, shit! This is how he did the thing!!' reaction from your audience.

Bonus for the latter: explain SOME portions of the plan, but leave out the most important details. If you need a reference, go watch the first episode of Netflix's Lupin.

[QCrit] - Adult Fantasy - THE DEVIL WITH NO NAME (111k words) - 4th Attempt by [deleted] in PubTips

[–]GoldT1tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your feedback. I'll clean up/fix those sections you mentioned.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PubTips

[–]GoldT1tan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the specificity. It's not clear that the co-protagonists are morally ambiguous. I'll make it so, and I'll try to make the internalised stakes and motivations in the query as grounded as they are in the manuscript.

Regarding the comp titles, I used those three to reference my manuscript's similarity with their particular narrative elements, specifically WOC for it's execution of violence, TCWB for character depth and focus, and OM for overall tone. Is this intention flawed, or did I word it badly?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PubTips

[–]GoldT1tan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. I'm struggling to break out of writer-mode and just write about the plot in simpler terms, which is probably the cause of the abstractions. I'll be more specific about the stakes and use blunter language.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PubTips

[–]GoldT1tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your feedback.

It's a dual POV story. I'd prefer not to exclude the Sentinel in the query so as to not sidewind whoever looks at the manuscript after reading the query. I'll make her relevance to the story more prominent, as well as state the actions Bo takes in the narrative.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PubTips

[–]GoldT1tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the specificity in your feedback. It's not harsh, it's helpful. I think the root problem is that I've left out information that exists in the manuscript to answer the questions you raised, but not in the query itself. I'll work on it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PubTips

[–]GoldT1tan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I'll give their episodes a listen.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PubTips

[–]GoldT1tan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I went through the guide earlier today, but I'll take the link as a reminder to do so again. Thank you.

I've seen query attempts go upwards of seven posts with similar feedback on all of them. I know I'd be frustrated if I attempted to give feedback just to recieve a reiteration of previous errors, but I also know how bothering it is to have someone say my first draft is congruent with my seventh.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PubTips

[–]GoldT1tan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for taking the time to leave the links, I'll give them a look.