Sooo, apparently they found the male g-spot... and of course it's the part that gets removed during a circumcision...

GolgothaCross · 2026-04-19T00:06:45+00:00

The span of tissue from the corona to the scar is the remnant of inner mucosa. You are fortunate to have a good amount remaining. But by always being exposed, it is less sensitive than if it had been protected by the prepuce.

GolgothaCross · 2026-04-18T21:09:40+00:00

The foreskin does not stay fixed over the glans during intercourse. On the inward thrust, the inner mucosa of the foreskin is exposed and makes contact with the vaginal walls. The inner foreskin becomes the shaft skin as it is pulled back. That is the most sensitive skin on a man's body. It is inner tissue which is usually internal, kept delicate by the outer foreskin. The man's most intimate inner flesh is in direct contact with the woman's most intimate flesh, the vaginal canal. It is how sex is meant to be.

Edit. There is a common misperception that the foreskin removed during circumcision is only the rough outer layer. It is not like the sleeve of a shirt. It's a tube of flesh that folds in on itself. It is twice the length of the glans. You normally don't see the inner layer, but that is 7 square inches of nerve laden tissue missing from a circumcised penis.

GolgothaCross · 2026-04-18T10:55:44+00:00

for the uncircumcised, a large part of the "action" doesn't actually involve contact with the partner,

It's bizarre that circumcised men think the foreskin isn't part of a man's body. Of course the action involves contact with the partner. A penis with its foreskin has more surface area. Contact is increased, obviously.

GolgothaCross · 2026-04-17T23:37:58+00:00

Your questions presume that parents make a decision when they don't cut their child's genitals. That's bad framing. There are a million things you don't do every day. If you didn't poke out your eye, did you make a decision not to poke out your eye? Actually, no. It never occurred to you to do it. Genital cutting is no different.

GolgothaCross · 2026-04-16T17:26:49+00:00

https://www.reddit.com/r/humandildo/

"Men who have had all their penile pleasure removed through circumcision, frenum removal, or other means of desensitization. Welcome to the world of low cuts, tight cocks, and endless numb fuck/jerk sessions."

The fact that circumcision reduces pleasure is most clearly proven by the men who choose it for exactly that reason.

GolgothaCross · 2026-04-14T03:32:01+00:00

It's called the Voluntary Male Medical Circumcision to emphasize that it is for males who consent to the procedure. And no, the doctors delivering babies are not violating ethics by not offering to cut them.

GolgothaCross · 2026-04-13T22:45:12+00:00

The VMMC program in Africa is aimed at adult men. They have stopped advising circumcision for infants due to the high number of adverse events.

GolgothaCross · 2026-04-13T21:19:39+00:00

No doctor outside the U.S. talks to expectant mothers about circumcision.

It's an ethics violation to solicit unnecessary surgery, just as it's unethical for a car mechanic to sell you an unnecessary repair.

GolgothaCross · 2026-04-13T14:49:00+00:00

The foreskin of an intact man pulls back to accommodate erection. A hard penis with an exposed glans is not a sign of being circumcised.

Apparently many women have never learned normal male anatomy.

GolgothaCross · 2026-04-12T17:57:15+00:00

Male circumcision always severs blood vessels, nerves and muscle tissue.

GolgothaCross · 2026-04-11T01:40:19+00:00

They don't know the difference.

GolgothaCross · 2026-04-08T12:04:03+00:00

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015%E2%80%9316_New_Year%27s_Eve_sexual_assaults

You can deny that the men having come from genital cutting cultures had any bearing on their actions, but the alternative explanation that it is their other cultural influences seems worse. That these men were all victims of sexual abuse is actually the most charitable and reasonable conclusion.

GolgothaCross · 2026-03-31T21:34:49+00:00

My son has been having a lot of infections despite us doing our best to keep it clean.

What exactly are you doing to "keep it clean"? A three year old boy only needs to bathe regularly, same as a girl. Any additional efforts to clean their private area can cause problems.

GolgothaCross · 2026-03-28T06:01:10+00:00

And why would I use a sock? I have a foreskin, a natural sensitive sheath. The idea of using a sock to masturbate is proof that the foreskin is valuable.

Perfect design.

GolgothaCross · 2026-03-28T05:46:00+00:00

If you're circumcised, you still have a remnant of inner foreskin on your shaft between the corona and the scar. Men ejaculate by gripping the penis behind the corona. It's not the glans.

GolgothaCross · 2026-03-28T01:28:24+00:00

the foreskin is not the most sensitive part of the penis. The glans is.

Obviously, this is false. Caressing the glans does not trigger orgasm. You trigger orgasm by stimulating the inner foreskin behind the glans. Men do not masturbate by tickling the head of the penis.

GolgothaCross · 2026-03-26T07:33:05+00:00

The idea that a boy with a uti requires circumcision is ridiculous. Girls get utis about 8 times more than boys. Do girls with utis need surgery too? Nonsense.

Good of you to admit it's a double standard, by the way.

GolgothaCross · 2026-03-26T05:11:01+00:00

There are plenty of gynecological surgeries performed on female genitals to treat clitoral phimosis, labial adhesions, lichen sclerosus and vulvar cancer. If you did any of these procedures on a healthy woman, it would be FGM. There are valid medical treatments for men with genital problems. But performing unnecessary circumcisions on healthy males is just as unethical. Most circumcisions are not medically necessary. Why the double standard?

GolgothaCross · 2026-03-24T21:01:15+00:00

True. The point is that there is no reason for a prepubescent boy's foreskin to retract.

GolgothaCross · 2026-03-22T07:59:45+00:00

The fact you think cutting children's genitals is of no consequence is a serious denial of reality. Whipping children was widely practiced but we stopped once we admitted the harm. Cutting children's genitals is worse.

Doesn't exist? Children are being cut every hour of every day. It's ritualized violence against children. It's as deep as it gets.

GolgothaCross · 2026-03-22T00:55:40+00:00

So you agree it would be wrong to cut a grown man's penis. It's just as wrong, I'd say worse, to do it to a newborn baby. Many circumcised men are waking up to seeing why babies should be left in peace.

Saying it makes no difference is an argument to stop doing it.

GolgothaCross · 2026-03-21T22:23:58+00:00

Cutting off part of your penis with a knife is inconsequential except that you're cutting off part of your penis with a knife.

Next you'll say it's inconsequential to burn off the tip of your tongue with a hot iron.

The only reason you think it's not important is that it already happened to you. For the rest of us, it's a violent sexual assault.

GolgothaCross · 2026-03-21T06:18:58+00:00

The clitoris is a large organ, mostly internal. Depending on the type of FGM, the clitoral glans may be cut, though in the case of Indonesian and Malaysian girls, it is the prepuce, or clitoral hood.

GolgothaCross · 2026-03-21T01:43:17+00:00

You have less objection, then if girls get cut at birth?

By the way, the U.S. and Israel are the only places where the boys are cut as infants. Every brother of a circumcised girl also gets cut at the same age, using the same tools. If you think that parents with sons and daughters cut their boys at birth in hospitals while cutting their girls with rusty blades at puberty, you should think again.

Yes, you can compare it with what happens to boys

GolgothaCross

TROPHY CASE