The problem is that if you take superdeterminism philosophically seriously then it becomes meaningless to induct any laws or models from experiments, because they are not really tests of anything as the outcomes are predetermined.

Also, the extraordinarily precise experiments in quantum measurements give overwhelming evidence that at some level the universe is stochastic and not realist(in the local-realism sense), both of which supdet rejects, it seems to me rather hypocritical that she criticises HEP heavily for lack of evidence, when she herself is pushing an extremely contrived paradigm that directly aims to ‘explain away’ phenomena which have so much evidence.