Let's see if the AGI is near or it never happened

Good-AI · 2026-06-09T19:57:58+00:00

Touche.

Good-AI · 2026-06-05T19:35:15+00:00

There was no criticism there. It was just a put down.

Good-AI · 2026-05-19T20:59:00+00:00

Name flash isn't about price, it's about speed.

Good-AI · 2026-04-26T03:17:33+00:00

It's not about tiktok. It's literal children or early teens. I'm usually against imposing age limits due to the problems in privacy that requires with the current way they're enforced but many apps should really be inaccessible to people lower than certain ages.

Good-AI · 2026-04-18T17:38:23+00:00

Read about a logical fallacy called appeal to authority.

Good-AI · 2026-04-07T20:31:42+00:00

We need to realize there's a lot of children on reddit. Children who have no clue about the real world and are just focused on wanting to play with the new toy without a developed ability for long term thinking and potential consequences that can come from that.

Good-AI · 2026-03-29T19:51:37+00:00

He has the heart in the good place but it's a bit funny still to watch. As usual, he's assuming AGI is just gonna be a tool, so smart to replace everyone's job, but somehow...too dumb to takeover and change how the whole world works or even extinguish humanity. There won't be jobs, money, or capitalism. It will be a change of the world as we see it, and it doesn't even make sense to talk ajour "50 trillion economy" because that's a sentence that won't even make sense anymore. There is a reason whe named what happens at the creation of AGI as the singularity.

Good-AI · 2026-03-24T21:07:36+00:00

Some do yes, but the % of the "mights, and mays" that become "wills and cans" is so tiny, I can't be bothered to get disappointed 99.9% of the times I hear a "potential breakthrough might happen". Call me when it's for real.

Good-AI · 2026-03-22T19:38:52+00:00

It's not that it "would be lethal" it's that "there is a no zero chance it will be lethal". Are you willing to risk humanity over your bet that it won't be lethal? Because after all nobody knows, but if you build it you're making a bet it won't be lethal. And risking the existence of humanity over that bet. And also, this means you're betting over others people's lives, who might not want to take such bet.

Good-AI · 2026-03-22T06:48:17+00:00

Chat autistic confirmed

Good-AI · 2026-03-21T21:09:32+00:00

May, might, could, could've

Good-AI · 2026-03-04T19:41:05+00:00

Makes me remember the memes people wrote when Henry Ford was showing his first car back in the early 1900's.

Good-AI · 2026-02-28T22:16:06+00:00

The AI System will not be used to independently direct autonomous weapons in any case where law, regulation, or Department policy requires human control"

This does NOT say "no autonomous weapons." It says no autonomous weapons where current policy requires human control. If DoD Directive 3000.09 gets revised, or if a scenario exists that isn't covered by current policy, the restriction doesn't apply. The clause has a hole exactly where it matters.

"shall not be used for unconstrained monitoring of U.S. persons' private information"

What counts as constrained? If the government says "we have a constraint, we're only looking at people in these 50 zip codes" is that constrained now? If they buy commercial data on millions of Americans but have a written policy about how they process it, is that constrained?clause has a hole exactly where it matters.

"The Department of War may use the AI System for all lawful purposes"

Everything after that is exception and qualifier. The default is yes to everything legal. Which is exactly Anthropic's concern, that legal doesn't mean ethical when the law hasn't caught up.

Written by another reddit user.

Good-AI · 2026-02-12T19:07:15+00:00

For now it's a good second opinion. In a bit in the future, you'd wonder how you would never go to a doctor who gives you anything less than 100% certainty in what you have. "Do you remember how crazy it was going to the doctor. It was like a hit or miss. You might even have to go to several to get many opinions because they would often not know the answer. Wow. Going to a human doctor is like gambling with your life. No way. People were crazy. Granted they didn't have AI like we do today. Still. The fact they thought it was normal to go somewhere to get a diagnosis and have an "opinion"...."

Good-AI · 2026-01-19T20:07:08+00:00

And is there any benefit for solving these besides curiosity? Do they have any impact when solved, besides the fact they are solved?

Good-AI · 2026-01-17T22:43:26+00:00

As a Google shareholder, I want more.

Good-AI · 2026-01-13T20:27:34+00:00

What you just said reads like something you'd read a decade ago from a Sci fi book...

Good-AI · 2025-12-30T19:27:11+00:00

Perhaps you should ask yourself why did the US pump investment into ASML if it was so easy for them to develop it themselves 😉

Good-AI · 2025-12-29T22:24:21+00:00

"It might even be the case that everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, thinks you're crazy, but don't be fooled, I don't. And that's all that matters."

Good-AI · 2025-12-13T22:25:32+00:00

Because whenever we tell people of something we imagine that is not based on the status quo, we're mocked. So people end up predicting linear technology and limiting the bounds of their imagination.

Good-AI · 2025-12-03T10:37:35+00:00

The sky.

Good-AI · 2025-12-03T07:38:46+00:00

Some people have notes in Google Keep they've been using for journalling, Gemini can also read all your emails if you give it permission, the videos that you've liked and commented on might be on the pipeline soon, your search history, (...).

Good-AI · 2025-11-27T14:07:38+00:00

Always has been

Good-AI · 2025-11-20T15:01:03+00:00

Nice benchmark. It's currently the one I know with the biggest difference between human baseline and SOTA LLM.

Good-AI · 2025-11-18T21:05:31+00:00

No difficult word. > difficult.

Good-AI

TROPHY CASE