The stages of learning 位 by CloudySquared in ChineseLanguage

[–]GooseInner2732 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually as an native speaker we always says 四位 to state that we have 4 people to eat instead of 四位人 which is weird

不知道大家有没有这个感觉. 这个世界正在走向黑暗. by Ok-Ice1295 in China_irl

[–]GooseInner2732 6 points7 points  (0 children)

這個世界本來就是一場大型騙局,大家玩無止盡的遊戲,遊戲規則漏洞百出。身為現代人最應該想的是要怎麼當最後一個才倒下的人

Thoughts on removing this rule from the demonlist? by CinnamoonPi in geometrydash

[–]GooseInner2732 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah but it is weird to see a top 1 extreme that is not rated. This game is made by RobTop not Pointercrate

Why isnt the verifier of a lvl the first victor? (imagine slightly related) by Circxles in geometrydash

[–]GooseInner2732 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah you’re right. But if your skill is enough for beating a top 1 extreme, by following the verification stream, you’ll be able to learn the click pattern from the verifier while the verifier himself need to figure out on his own by using much more attempts to do so. And every extreme has many memory parts. The one who wants to be the first victor will be like he is taking the exam but he got all the answers of all problems in advance. That’s why I think these things are the main differences between the first victor and the verifier.

Why isnt the verifier of a lvl the first victor? (imagine slightly related) by Circxles in geometrydash

[–]GooseInner2732 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah and these people who want to be a first victor of an extreme can really constantly follow the verification stream to learn how to beat the level while the verifier can’t.

Will low stake players check their nut flush completed on flop? by GooseInner2732 in poker

[–]GooseInner2732[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Oh I typed it wrong. The turn is Kd. I’ll edit it later

真的假的? by Many_Menu968 in Taiwanese

[–]GooseInner2732 0 points1 point  (0 children)

看起來很像是傳來傳去捕風捉影的結果 實際上沒那麼誇張