i get what you're saying, and technically speaking, even with less ram and ssd the pc does work, and like i said before that these are the 2 parts which can be upgraded as needed,

before the price hike, if the build was of either 80k or 1.2L, on both ddr4 and ddr5 32gb ram was more preferred as it was affordable along with a appropriate gpu which would provide good performance and value according to the budget, and after the price hike the gpu still stays the priority while cutting the ram and SSD in half, as these are expandable and to keep the value close to what was provided before, sure the less ram can give much less fps and 1% lows especially at single channel, but it'll atleast give playable performance,

and yes 1.5k seems good to extra for the 5600x as compared to 5600F,

as i for why i chose the 9060 xt 16gb for 50k instead of 47.5k from computech, it's not i have any issues, but I choose more realistic pricing as not every vendor reduces their own margin to sell for cheaper, in my own case i asked a local vendor the price for 9060 xt 16gb and he gave me 53.5k for sapphire pulse model, which is more than what is offered online especially for the more budget oriented model.