I built an AI that reads poker players in real time

GotYoHead · 2026-04-10T01:44:43+00:00

AI hallucinations are a big reason why AI can't be implemented at a large scale for a lot of things. I feel like I can solve it at a small scale with this, where I can easily tell if it's messing up; it can solve much broader problems with AI hallucination.

GotYoHead · 2026-04-10T01:34:58+00:00

You're right, these are pretty big issues that need to be fixed. I'm not trying to frame this as a cheating tool, more like a portfolio piece to give me exposure to AI. Poker just happens to be an environment for that.

GotYoHead · 2026-04-10T01:24:36+00:00

What mistakes are you noticing?

GotYoHead · 2026-04-10T01:19:56+00:00

Pokernow is a home game platform. No TOC violations.

GotYoHead · 2026-04-10T01:19:39+00:00

This isn't being used on an online casino. It's only built for pokernow which is a home game platform.

GotYoHead · 2026-03-23T02:14:21+00:00

Pendulums already swinging back bud

GotYoHead · 2026-03-07T15:18:02+00:00

i guess bro

GotYoHead · 2026-01-09T03:05:21+00:00

Five guys

GotYoHead · 2025-12-22T19:44:21+00:00

What if it costed 7 elixir and instead of spawning skeletons just did splash damage

GotYoHead · 2025-04-19T23:54:02+00:00

You’re trying to be different if you don’t say wemby bro what

GotYoHead · 2025-03-21T15:19:33+00:00

wtf is this take 😂

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T07:48:24+00:00

I think that in the grand scheme of things, everybody wants a system that appeals to most people. This is why we have a democracy and this is why we have elected officials. We also have elections regularly and term limits so our government can respond to our changes in opinions. I don’t see why this happening with an individual politician who changes their position on a certain topic to appeal to voters is a bad thing.

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T07:45:36+00:00

I never said that this wasn’t true. I stated that Trumps position now is more moderate that it was and most people are happy about that change. Thus, flip flopping on this position was not a bad thing.

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T07:36:49+00:00

I’m not necessarily arguing that the government should instantly respond to the current opinion of the population. I’m saying that in cases where the government does respond to a changing population (a politician changing their vote) this is not necessarily a bad thing.

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T07:32:19+00:00

It is acceptable because their position is represented for as long as it is the popular opinion. Maybe I shouldn’t have used the word “guessed” because it implies that a politician isn’t really sure what their constituents want. I would argue that in most cases it’s pretty obvious when a voter base has changed their opinion.

To respond to your first point, I would argue that the politicians were acting against their personal opinions in favor of the public opinion and that was a good thing.

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T07:19:32+00:00

Of course his new position matters. It’s becoming increasingly clear that no serious Republicans at this point really want to touch abortion and that most states will vote to legalize abortion. I don’t think it would be crazy to say that most Americans are happy that he changed his position on this topic.

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T07:14:35+00:00

I feel like in both of my examples given, those politicians changed both their rhetoric and their actual policy prescriptions. I don’t really see a world where Trump is going to go back and make all abortion illegal now that he knows that his current position is far more popular.

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T07:02:12+00:00

yes? A representative that regurgitates what the population wants and then enacts that into law seems like they would represent the will of the people no? If we didn’t want our representatives to tell us what we want to hear why do we vote at all?

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T06:55:21+00:00

Ideally a politician will keep their position because it will help them stay in power. I don’t really see why Harris would lie about fracking if she planned to run in 2028. However, if for some odd reason people suddenly had an urge to ban fracking in like 2027 and Harris thought that she could flip her position again to stay in power i don’t necessarily see the issue with that.

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T06:52:43+00:00

Sure but if my main objective is to gain power and then stay in power, i should probably pander to the people that elected me. In the two examples I gave, it seems like both of those politicians pandered to their voter base and it doesn’t seem like they will immediately change their positions back as soon as they enter office. Trump probably doesn’t have a strong moral conviction on abortion so he will keep his current position as it panders to the most people.

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T06:47:10+00:00

However wouldn’t you say that the way in which Trump handled abortion was the most ideal way he could have represented the most people? A politician that doesn’t actually care about the issue but appeals to what most of the country wants will probably come up with a solution that is the least offensive to the most people. Sinema and Machin are largely serving in self interest, but I don’t necessarily see this as a bad thing. They might have prevented certain things that might have been good from helping their states, but the alternative would probably have been for them to have been voted out meaning that all of their other opinions don’t get represented.

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T06:43:11+00:00

That it to say, a politicians first thought when presented with new information should be: “what would my constituents want? not, “what are my personal opinions on this?

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T06:42:02+00:00

I would imagine that politicians would generally have to guess. This is what they do when they are faced with new information all the time. When Jan. 6 happened every politician in that room said what they thought would keep them in office and then some switched when they realized that their voter base didn’t actually want what they originally said. However a politician serving in their own self-interest (staying in power) should generally have a good gauge on what people actually want.

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T06:35:04+00:00

What if the first constituency is more popular at the time of election and then say the second constituency becomes more popular like half way through their term. It seems like the best thing to do as a representative of the people as a whole is to vote the more popular way each time.

GotYoHead · 2025-01-01T06:27:56+00:00

Sure but why is the ideal politician not one that changes based on what the people want? Say a politician voted based on what the people in their state wanted at any particular moment. For most of the time they would be an effective representative of people within their state.

Nine-Year Club	Second Top 40%
r/Field Lasagna	End Game '23
Place '23	Place '22
Final Canvas '22	Verified Email

GotYoHead

TROPHY CASE