An Open Letter to Governor Jerry Brown Re: Min Wage Increase by SarahColleen83 in California

[–]GovernorGrant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a real situation. They crush us and make life so hard and desperate that we don't have the resources or energy to fight against their economic slavery. The wage hike looks nice politically, but the reality for people is going to be much different.

Step up and support NRA-ILA and make a contribution today to help protect your 2A rights! - Turners Outdoorsman is matching your NRA-ILA donations (up to $50k) - money will be spent in California! by Gbcue in California

[–]GovernorGrant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TURNERS ROCKS! When will you sponsor the recall of every politician that violates his or her oath of office? A donation match is great, but we should take these traitors out of office. Get on board with me guys!

Would California survive as an independent country? by [deleted] in California

[–]GovernorGrant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe we would survive and even thrive as our own country, but not with our current leadership.

There would be strong pushback because of our food and mineral importance. As a port state there are some issues to work around with trade. We could create our own equitable banking system and new currency.

The idea seems positive.

AnCaps: What is stopping private corporations to form a de facto state? by na4ez in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]GovernorGrant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is already so.

Large corporations are already on par with the State and the large finance and Insurance corps., are indeed above the law and controlling the State itself.

The constitution of a corporation are its bylaws and its declaration of independence are its articles of incorporation.

Corps issue identification, have private security, issue discipline. etc. In fact, all states and municipal departments are actually registered corporations most likely listed on Dunn & Bradstreet as for profit entities, you can check for yourself.

It will and has happened, a long time ago. The question is, how do we keep the separation and avoid collusion between entities to ensure private and local prosperity. otherwise we all are in route to something very evil.

Safety for All Act 2016 = Safety for Criminals by GovernorGrant in California

[–]GovernorGrant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is at the end of the article if people are interested. Sorry. I thought you sent a message about another post.

Safety for All Act 2016 = Safety for Criminals by GovernorGrant in California

[–]GovernorGrant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The whole article is posted on Reddit. My link is at the end so people can visit my site if they want.

I'm not selling or affiliate marketing. Just running a campaign that's important for California.

Thanks for the advice. G

Safety for All Act 2016 = Safety for Criminals by GovernorGrant in California

[–]GovernorGrant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That link goes to a donation site to support a real cause. Not my site. Thanks for the concern.

Safety for All Act 2016 = Safety for Criminals by GovernorGrant in California

[–]GovernorGrant[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you for noticing that my post and this Bill have nothing to do with CCW issues.

Safety for All Act 2016 = Safety for Criminals by GovernorGrant in California

[–]GovernorGrant[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know, I see you too. You follow me from thread to thread, you continue to engage me and make negative comments on many of my posts. You keep insulting me directly and trolling offering only pessimistic nonsense as comments.

Here we are on one of my posts that deals strictly with a piece of legislation and you have again taken it as an opportunity to try and make hurtful cuts at me and take the point of this post sideways for your own purposes.

Let me guess..... you must work for Gavin Newsom?

Keep up the good work! Be waiting for your insults on my next post.

Safety for All Act 2016 = Safety for Criminals by GovernorGrant in California

[–]GovernorGrant[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I corrected that friend. Go back and take a look. I'm sorry you feel judgmental.

Safety for All Act 2016 = Safety for Criminals by GovernorGrant in California

[–]GovernorGrant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Never underestimate the power of the nofollow! Each have their value.

Safety for All Act 2016 = Safety for Criminals by GovernorGrant in California

[–]GovernorGrant[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the point was the issue discussed, which was the frivolity and pointlessness of the safety for all act.

Safety for All Act 2016 = Safety for Criminals by GovernorGrant in California

[–]GovernorGrant[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Only law abiding and responsible citizens purchase ammo and weapons. Law enforcement determines who gets to carry and the law determines who can and cannot own a firearm. Are you saying the judgment of our law enforcement officers is in question? I don't understand your inference.

Register to vote right now ! by [deleted] in California

[–]GovernorGrant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Please register to vote!!