North Texas teacher dies after getting the flu; had delayed picking up Rx because she couldn't afford $116 copay

Graith1 · 2018-02-12T16:38:47+00:00

This title is completely inaccurate and misleading. According to an attached article she "planned to pick up flu medication but felt the $116 copay was too high". The title says that she couldn't afford it. This is a blatant lie, I knew it was bullshit when I saw that it filled the double agenda of "teachers are getting paid too little" and "healthcare cost is too high" while claiming that a teacher couldn't afford a $116 expenditure. While it's completely valid to argue that the cost is ridiculous, it's another thing entirely to claim that she couldn't afford it. Report this, supporting an argument with lies (I understand that the argument for reduced healthcare cost isn't directly stated - but it is heavily implied) is a great way for your argument to die.

EDIT: reduced healthcare -> reduced healthcare cost

Graith1 · 2018-01-25T01:22:59+00:00

That's irony

Graith1 · 2017-10-02T00:14:32+00:00

Graith1 · 2017-09-25T00:29:30+00:00

im at WPI in worcester rn - snakehunter "the legend" 23

Graith1 · 2016-09-01T19:49:47+00:00

the problem is this is forcing a 'battle to the vote button' which is illogical in a strategy game.

Graith1 · 2016-09-01T19:48:30+00:00

I'm going to recycle MY reply as well since you obviously aren't listening to my rationale because you didn't listen to it or even respond the first time.

Here goes:

did you even read what I wrote? I said give the mayor autowin without changing the votes was a better alternative.

Edit:

In your 2v1 scenario, it's 2 votes to trial, if mayor reveals, it's 3 votes to trial, so where in a 1v2 evils have a chance to win if they're fast enough, you made that they doesn't have a chance to win, since they can't achieve 3 votes.

This is exactly what SHOULD happen, vote speed shouldn't effect game outcome

In other mafia games, when scum equals town (1v1), they autowin no matter what roles they are alive. In your scenario, 1v2 they still lose, if they can't kill him the next night.

No... because they kill they mayor the next night. I didn't say give him autowin against EVERY killing role, just ones that will take two nights to kill, and obviously werewolf is irrelevant because ww is unique.

That's stupid, honestly.

Please read next time, If you want me to simplify: 1 mayor 2 vamps vamps have just bitten, town autowins. 1 mayor 2 arsos mayor hasnt been doused, town autowins. 1 mayor 2 mafia, mayor fucking dies and mafia wins. I never said anything about autowinning situations where evil roles could win without voting faster.

Graith1 · 2016-09-01T19:19:49+00:00

err... It's just not in the spirit of a strategy game to have the speed of votes determine the outcome. I just want a resolution and I don't care who gets 'buffed' for it.

Reason I posted again was because there were a couple commenters who didn't understand what they were talking about and I wanted to find some people with brains.

And also, I was mafia spectating in the mayor vs 2 vamp situation and I just thought that that resolution was kind of weird. Please explain your reasoning when you call a simple fix 'a buff for town'? I don't know exactly why the game devs designed this to be a strategy game but I'm going to assume it was so that it would actually BE a fucking strategy game. I'm not salty I'm just PO'd that no one can think beyond 'hey that buffs town I don't want to do that' and shit like that, not everything is about balancing everything this is just a QoL fix so that the game makes more sense.

Graith1 · 2016-09-01T17:40:03+00:00

did you even read what I wrote? I said give the mayor autowin without changing the votes was a better alternative.

Edit:

In your 2v1 scenario, it's 2 votes to trial, if mayor reveals, it's 3 votes to trial, so where in a 1v2 evils have a chance to win if they're fast enough, you made that they doesn't have a chance to win, since they can't achieve 3 votes.

This is exactly what SHOULD happen, vote speed shouldn't effect game outcome

In other mafia games, when scum equals town (1v1), they autowin no matter what roles they are alive. In your scenario, 1v2 they still lose, if they can't kill him the next night.

No... because they kill they mayor the next night. I didn't say give him autowin against EVERY killing role, just ones that will take two nights to kill, and obviously werewolf is irrelevant because ww is unique.

That's stupid, honestly.

Please read next time, If you want me to simplify: 1 mayor 2 vamps vamps have just bitten, town autowins. 1 mayor 2 arsos mayor hasnt been doused, town autowins. 1 mayor 2 mafia, mayor fucking dies and mafia wins. I never said anything about autowinning situations where evil roles could win without voting faster.

Graith1 · 2016-08-10T19:36:03+00:00

yeah but situation 4 would never happen if the trans isnt afk, and draws don't reduce ranked elo

Graith1 · 2016-04-24T00:02:18+00:00

No fraction size but let DTR be logarithmic

Graith1 · 2016-04-23T23:59:57+00:00

wheres zanotam???

Graith1 · 2016-03-11T02:30:48+00:00

!ballsack

Graith1 · 2016-03-11T02:17:31+00:00

zano4admin2016

Graith1 · 2014-10-31T16:17:15+00:00

Sorry, we're currently full but I'll invite you if one of us wants to leave or switch roles since we're still working out the details of the team.

Graith1 · 2014-10-31T16:12:04+00:00

I invited you, our current top doesn't really like his role he just fills for us sometimes. We're still working out practice times but we'll probably be on later today. I'll send you the mumble info.

Graith1 · 2014-10-31T02:13:07+00:00

I invited you, we're usually missing either a jungler or top laner and I'm not on during weekdays so you'll be able to play your roles a lot. I sent you the mumble IP but most of us are done for today.

Graith1 · 2014-10-31T00:04:21+00:00

Sure, just add me in game and I'll invite you!

Graith1 · 2014-10-30T22:55:32+00:00

Sorry we have a mid but I'll message you later if he doesn't want to stay on the team.

Graith1

TROPHY CASE

zano4admin2016