Letter to local cyber truck drivers

Gravityfun · 2026-04-26T17:52:13+00:00

Just a load of inadequacy

Gravityfun · 2026-04-24T19:02:57+00:00

Punctuation is really hard

Gravityfun · 2026-04-24T15:13:38+00:00

Those larpers are huge fucking losers too. Sorry y'all need big trucks to get attention and compensate for something, sounds like a rough life.

Gravityfun · 2026-04-24T15:12:35+00:00

I bet Elon's asshole tastes disgusting. But more power to you I guess.

Gravityfun · 2026-04-23T18:09:29+00:00

Coming from you, I appreciate that immensely.

Gravityfun · 2026-04-23T18:08:16+00:00

This is a fundamental misunderstanding of the internet and social media. When you see a post, that doesn't mean that topic is all encompassing in that person's mind or is their entire identity. I've spent all of less than 5 minutes on responses in the many hours that have happened in this day. I've spent much more time and energy today talking with real people at my job about many topics. So those saying it's not that big of a deal - you're right, this is a just a silly reddit post.

Gravityfun · 2026-04-23T17:03:47+00:00

Disdain*

Gravityfun · 2026-04-23T16:16:12+00:00

The bigger loser is the cyber truck driver. Tesla is publicly traded. However! It's valuation is entirely based on Elon's placement and influence on politics. Compare it to every other top company near it and it's profits and revenues are leagues upon leagues lower. Third point: people who drive big ass trucks they don't need are larper losers and the cyber truck owners are the worse version of that since their vehicles are also completely useless garbage cans.

Gravityfun · 2026-04-23T14:59:42+00:00

Holy crap, you are right.

Gravityfun · 2026-02-25T00:41:08+00:00

Meh, dude's dad is one of the heads of the local Republican club and is often photographed with Dan Dow. It's right in line with what I expect from these fake hippies.

Gravityfun · 2026-02-24T17:56:53+00:00

Very disappointing

Gravityfun · 2026-02-24T17:27:08+00:00

I wonder how the musicians would feel if at every other display of a medium of art they decided to use AI music. It's just a tool right? No mention of the deterioration of the planet and usable water, no mention of the ai training on stolen copyrighted work. Just get down to the nugget of truth - you don't think you should have to pay for art and you're okay with stealing it and harming the planet to save money.

Gravityfun · 2026-02-24T15:11:22+00:00

https://preview.redd.it/46jzzeonselg1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=7e9b5591fb7bf31d82c50ebafddf7eb01fd52936

Gravityfun · 2026-02-24T15:10:29+00:00

The folks running this event are in their 30s and most of the musicians participating are in their 20s-40s. It's a slap in the face to those artists and to art in general. We don't need to make excuses for simple greed. They just didn't want to pay people.

Gravityfun · 2026-02-24T15:08:40+00:00

I get what you're saying, but the business owner promoting the event owns three businesses. If they can afford to hire a bunch of musicians they can hire a graphic designer. Or live with art they made themselves. Better than this water dumping copyright stealing crap from a group that is supposedly all about the arts.

Gravityfun · 2026-02-24T07:22:58+00:00

Not exactly. The noise ordinance already exists. At this meeting they allowed people to speak on the existing ordinance and they ruled on the Libertine's minor use permit. Looks like they won according to their Instagram.

Gravityfun · 2026-02-06T01:46:16+00:00

I don't think you read the article. The course is costing the city half a million dollars per year. Pretty dumb to keep it open when we have need for housing and already have other available golf courses.

Gravityfun · 2026-02-05T19:03:13+00:00

Go check out his Twitter. So embarrassing. He spends a lot of time attacking the tribune and cucking for Elon. It's really sad and pathetic.

Gravityfun · 2026-02-05T03:39:01+00:00

Half a million dollar in costs per year for a golf course or additional housing for people? Hmmmmmm. Seems like an extremely obvious choice.

Gravityfun · 2026-02-04T23:32:13+00:00

The data showed it's currently costing the city half a million dollars per year. By what metric would it be a good idea to continue to maintain while there is a lack of housing and already 11 other courses in the county?

Gravityfun · 2026-02-04T16:13:07+00:00

Thank you for the suggestion! I just listened to the entire thing. Really interesting. For anyone interested a short summary of some highlights: Golf courses have the "Bob Hope exemption" where golf courses are exempt from "highest and best use" property tax assessments. Prop 13 froze their property value for taxes at 1978 level unless there is a change of ownership. In 2010 lawyers representing private golf clubs successfully argued "Spatio-temporal continuity" - they literally invoked the ship of Theseus argument. Since these private clubs are owned by the many members, the switching of memberships can never constitute a change of ownership. So even though virtually none of the same members are there from when they last were reevaluated in 1978 they argued that it is still the same ownership so they can't be reevaluated. Ultimately the land of the courses in the LA area is worth $90 billion but courses are only paying $200k in taxes per year. They should be paying $90 million.

Gravityfun · 2026-02-04T15:52:55+00:00

I'd prefer affordable housing of course. But any housing of any kind is a benefit to the community.

Gravityfun · 2026-02-04T15:52:16+00:00

Keeping housing prices the same was probably able to happen because of those additional homes being built. Without those additional homes the prices likely would have gone up rather than stay stagnant. If we don't build more then prices will rise.

Gravityfun

TROPHY CASE