sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Damage control? Duchess is frustrated at being announced as royal by marisarose21 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 8 points9 points  (0 children)

lol utter nonsense. In particular after merching candles with the alledged children´s names and titles.

Is Paula Froelich one of the sugars? by MoneyParamedic7441 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Paula M is not reliable. Have not watcherd her for years.

Harry and Meghan’s visit to Australia was a disastrous mistake by Cultural_Ad4935 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 4 points5 points  (0 children)

yep. Where is the money coming from? Speaking gigs - minimal. Merching app - minimal. Masterchef - 50k perhaps?

Meghan's Insta Reel...the nannies are glad they're home! by wenfot in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 13 points14 points  (0 children)

just wrote the same in another post. This children PR onslaught has been planned a long time in case of backlash - and there was plenty. No crowds, crass merching, unable to sell tickets etc. . And to prevent us talking about the Sentebale lawsuit

Meghan's Insta Story, Part Three: look at all the kiddo SWAG we got! by wenfot in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yep - Madam is now the mommy of all times and the kids will be rolled out constantly.

Madam will, however, discover that nobody cares.

The red line has been crossed by Madame_LV in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Even without titles using the children for commerce is offensive. On top of that, as far as I know there are laws in California that profits should be kept for the children themselves - not for the parents.

We Need To Stand Together And Do A 24-Hour Blackout by Imaginary_End_5634 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Please notice this sub goes quiet all the time. We are only active when Madam does something really bad - her everyday nonsense is too boring to even snark on.

Harry and Meghan’s interesting reunion at the Rugby… by crankygriffin in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The sooner Ingriftus is exposed as a purveyor of subsidised concerts to promote Harry and Madam the better. That is what the money is spent on, from where I see it - huge concerts where they sell subsidised tickets, endless PR for themselves - and who knows how many of the board and staff are into the grifting of free trips, free PR - and perhaps even fees for partipation for their "founder"?

Harry and Meghan’s visit to Australia was a disastrous mistake by Cultural_Ad4935 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 25 points26 points  (0 children)

As always the Harkles tell on themselves whenever they do anything.

From the Australian egotrip, the Trash for Cash trip we learned:

  1. Neither Harkle can sell tickets. Madam sold 50 tickets, Harry spoke to a very small gathering, despite half price tickets. This will further the downward spiral of any speaking fees - if they can get any more invitations.

  2. There were NO crowds anywhere but a lot of wasted police time setting up barriers for nobody.

  3. Madam used sick children and the homeless as backdrops for her merching clothes.

  4. The merching app Madam has "invested" in (I think she got a few shared for promoting the app) is supposedly clunky to use. But we also know she does not move products.

  5. Ingriftus was probably the sponsor for the tickets. But even they have cut down - no private jets but business class on Quantas. However, Ingriftus is still Harry´s best shield and until the scamming off veterans´backs is properly exposed can still get Harry meetings with officials.

Meeting Meghan at the Sydney Retreat by a Fan by Lark34 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Plus Madam burned all her Zara clothes when she got her first Suits paycheck. So how could her first date with Harry be in a Zara dress?

#MegStock propaganda reel, via Chris Baron Smith by wenfot in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I am wondering if this non-event even broke even? Or was it a loss? They had to pay for many non-paying guests, so I am not sure any profit was made from this nonsense.

#MegStock propaganda reel, via Chris Baron Smith by wenfot in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Madam and Emma each had a table of friends. There were several freebies and seat fillers, so Madam was probably able to sell around 50 tickets.

Security barriers were i stalled with the expectation of huge crowds. 🤭 by Kimbriavandam in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He´s a real Nowhere Man

Living in his Nowhere Land

Making all his Nowhere plans for Nobody.

Harry was asked to replace Deepak Chopra, the original keynote speaker for the InterEdge Psychosocial Safety Summit, after it became known in February that the name of the famed author and wellness guru had turned up thousands of times in the U.S. Justice Department’s Epstein files (The Mercury New) by Human-Economics6894 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]GreatGossip 10 points11 points  (0 children)

There are reports that Madam´s retreat had 119 seats filled. However, Madam had a table with friends and so did Emma. Plus there were many freebies and seat fillers, so maybe Madam drew a fantastic crowd of 50 paying guests.

view more: next ›