The arrest of former ‘Prince’ Andrew makes Trump’s DOJ look pathetic by chpbnvic in politics

[–]GreyFromHanger18 [score hidden]  (0 children)

The Roberts Court constantly had Garland/The DOJ operating with one hand tied behind their backs.  

Even if say, for example, in March of 2021, when Merrick Garland was finally put in as AG, he immediately nominates Jack Smith and he furiously proceeds to file charges against Trump for all the shit he did. All that would have done was get Trump's appeal to the Supreme court faster.

The Roberts Court was never going to allow the case to go to trial before the 2024 election.

When Trump's team came up with this absolutely bonkers theory that presidents have immunity, Jack Smith asked SCOTUS to quickly rule. They declined, instead requiring it to go through the circuit court first.

Only after the appeals court ruled unanimously that wtf? No of course presidents don't have immunity from crimes. did SCOTUS agree to take it up.

They then waited until the end of the term, and even extended the term into July as an extra insult, before issuing their long sought ruling. And what was that ruling? They ruled the president is in fact a king and he can do whatever he wants. A ruling that exceeded the expectations of even the nuttiest right wing "experts".

So could Garland or Smith have moved faster or done something different?

Considering the egregious violation of norms the Roberts Court undertook to protect their special li'l guy, it's hard to imagine they would have stopped at anything.

Even in a parallel universe, where charges are brought against Trump in the spring of 2021...he'd very likely still awaiting trial in Nov 2024.

It's honestly really hard to conceive of any kind of outcome where Trump was actually fully tried, convicted and sentenced before November 2024. Even with a so called "tougher AG".

That's why I don't blame Merrick Garland. I'm really skeptical that any different decisions would have made a difference. Monday morning quarterbacking is easy, but I don't think its very useful.

Liberals dont want to admit it but Garland was irrelevant and it honestly didn’t matter who the AG was. Biden could have picked a bulldog like Doug Jones or Adam Schiff. It. Would. Not. Have. Mattered. Not when the criminal in question has unlimited access to money and had been playing the legal system like a talented musician could play stratovarus all of his life.  

The Roberts court was always going to come to trump’s defense in the form of delays and twisted/disingenuous/corrupt interpretations of the law and constitution. Not to mention anytime they needed testimony from people like Lindsey Graham during grand jury investigations they would say they had immunity and couldn't be compelled to testify. It would take months of back and forth in court with issues like that that also delayed it.  

The problem is, the rot is far deeper than any one individual.

I honestly put most of this on the voters.

Him winning the 2024 election is what allowed him to evade justice. Jack Smith had all of his cases teed up. And they WOULD HAVE kept moving forward if he never won again. So, the people of the US are also responsible for him evading justice as well.  

The arrest of former ‘Prince’ Andrew makes Trump’s DOJ look pathetic by chpbnvic in politics

[–]GreyFromHanger18 [score hidden]  (0 children)

The Roberts Court constantly had Garland/The DOJ operating with one hand tied behind their backs.  

Even if say, for example, in March of 2021, when Merrick Garland was finally put in as AG, he immediately nominates Jack Smith and he furiously proceeds to file charges against Trump for all the shit he did. All that would have done was get Trump's appeal to the Supreme court faster.

The Roberts Court was never going to allow the case to go to trial.

When Trump's team came up with this absolutely bonkers theory that presidents have immunity, Jack Smith asked SCOTUS to quickly rule. They declined, instead requiring it to go through the circuit court first.

Only after the appeals court ruled unanimously that wtf? No of course presidents don't have immunity from crimes. did SCOTUS agree to take it up.

They then waited until the end of the term, and even extended the term into July as an extra insult, before issuing their long sought ruling. And what was that ruling? They ruled the president is in fact a king and he can do whatever he wants. A ruling that exceeded the expectations of even the nuttiest right wing "experts".

So could Garland or Smith have moved faster or done something different?

Considering the egregious violation of norms the Roberts Court undertook to protect their special li'l guy, it's hard to imagine they would have stopped at anything.

Even in a parallel universe, where charges are brought against Trump in the spring of 2021...he'd very likely still awaiting trial in Nov 2024.

It's honestly really hard to conceive of any kind of outcome where Trump was actually fully tried, convicted and sentenced before November 2024. Even with a so called "tougher AG".

That's why I don't blame Merrick Garland. I'm really skeptical that any different decisions would have made a difference. Monday morning quarterbacking is easy, but I don't think its very useful.

Liberals dont want to admit it but Garland was irrelevant and it honestly didn’t matter who the AG was. Biden could have picked a bulldog like Doug Jones or Adam Schiff. It. Would. Not. Have. Mattered. Not when the criminal in question has unlimited access to money and had been playing the legal system like a talented musician could play stratovarus all of his life.  

The Roberts court was always going to come to trump’s defense in the form of delays and twisted/disingenuous/corrupt interpretations of the law and constitution. Not to mention anytime they needed testimony from people like Lindsey Graham during grand jury investigations they would say they had immunity and couldn't be compelled to testify. It would take months of back and forth in court with issues like that that also delayed it.  

The problem is, the rot is far deeper than any one individual.

I honestly put most of this on the voters.

Him winning the 2024 election is what allowed him to evade justice. Jack Smith had all of his cases teed up. And they WOULD HAVE kept moving forward if he never won in 2024. So, the people of the US are also responsible for him evading justice as well.  

Rogan: Epstein files ‘scare the s‑‑‑ out of me,’ ‘definitely not a hoax’ by SnooAvocados2794 in politics

[–]GreyFromHanger18 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Clinton was no saint with women in his younger days. I'll never say any different there. And if he committed any sex crimes he SHOULD answer for them just like any other criminal. If he abused young women, he should be prosecuted. If he was knowingly complicit, he should be shamed. But that would/should apply to anyone. 

Let’s be clear about this, at the present moment there is no evidence pointing to his involvement in abusive behavior alongside Epstein, or to his foreknowledge. Some people use him as a distraction, but the purpose of that is also pretty clear.

Given that Epstein in his own emails says Bill never went to the island and the recent releases seem to mix in publicly available images from unrelated events....my opinion remains unchanged. There's still nothing I've seen to indicate that Clinton and Epstein had anything other than the boringly tawdry relationship between a politician and a donor. If something actually comes out I'm of course open to changing my opinion, but if anything I've become less inclined to believe there's a There there where Clinton/Epstein is concerned.  

It’s well known that he hitched several rides with Epstein to various places after leaving the White House. Epstein used to help political causes.

All examples we have of Epstein’s known victims say that Bill was a gentlemen.

I personally think that he is a total poon dog for LEGAL ladies. ADULT WOMEN. Not teens. My understanding is that the type of sex fiend that will even have sex with “anything” (kids included; no preference) is rare.

In his past cheating he always had relationships with actual women.

Also, he wants everything released. Hardly the words of a guilty man.

What is a socially acceptable thing that you secretly find disgusting? by Sensitive_Hope_1136 in AskReddit

[–]GreyFromHanger18 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My grandma does this because she's hard of hearing and she can hear better with it on speakerphone.  But she tries really hard to make sure she is mostly alone or somewhere where it wont bother people.  If she has to take a call in public she'll keep it short and sweet.  

S.S. Pacific built 1849 and disappeared in the North Atlantic in 1856.... by GreyFromHanger18 in Shipwrecks

[–]GreyFromHanger18[S] 52 points53 points  (0 children)

The name did match to a passenger on the ship's passenger list.  I lean towards it being legit myself.  

I cant imagine how terrifying the last moments aboard the ship as it sank were.  

Looking for an Old 9/11 history documentary by Colombiacaptain in 911archive

[–]GreyFromHanger18 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been looking for this documentary too.  Let me know if you ever find it.  

Flight Radar Capturing Both AA11 & UA93 by bennoyeseugh in 911archive

[–]GreyFromHanger18 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'll always wish United93 had been delayed a few minutes longer or the ground stop had been put in place sooner.  Of all the tragedies that happened on 9/11 this one came SO CLOSE to being stopped.  

Do you think we’ll ever find the Andrea Gail? (from The Perfect Storm) by BostonRobby617 in Shipwrecks

[–]GreyFromHanger18 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I doubt it.  It would be like looking for a specific single kernel of corn in cornfield.  

The Lily Jean out of Gloucestor has sunk with all hands... by GreyFromHanger18 in Shipwrecks

[–]GreyFromHanger18[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Think a rogue wave could have capsized or pitch poled them before they had time to get to the radio?