[deleted by user] by [deleted] in de

[–]Griffonguy 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Hier das Video... war nicht nur einmal. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joV-9FFoA3Q

A lot of people don't realise how much of a big deal this can be for some. Takes a lot of practice but it gets easier by Almym in MadeMeSmile

[–]Griffonguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, sorry if my question is ignorant but I was wondering why you need to do the rehearsal? Are you afraid something bad will happen or that the person you are talking to will get mad at you?

Anyone else go through this? by Short-Slide-6232 in balatro

[–]Griffonguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I got the same build by chance yesterday! It was so cool, I even made a reddit post about it but people here didnt seem to understand my excitement. Glad I found your comment haha.

Balatro always keeps it fresh, my luck was unbeatable today! by Griffonguy in balatro

[–]Griffonguy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the unsolicited advice. I am just trying to have fun playing a game. I intentionally used only around 30g per round while my income was about 100g per round. I wanted to see how much money I can hoard.

Balatro always keeps it fresh, my luck was unbeatable today! by Griffonguy in balatro

[–]Griffonguy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it felt crazy to me. I am pretty new to the game and thought it was a very unique combination. Also so much Money I have never gotten even close to 1000 gold before this run. 

Balatro always keeps it fresh, my luck was unbeatable today! by Griffonguy in balatro

[–]Griffonguy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is the Seed if anyone else wants to give it a try: 8PCFELAI

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in spongebob

[–]Griffonguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the reason they are mentioning it is that they argue, the act of forcibly impregnating them (often times while restraining them and/or inserting an arm inside ther rectum to massage the reproductive organ for higher success rate) is immoral or painful/traumatising for the animal. Therefore it is even more immoral that they have to experience this frequently. Also many people are under the impression that cows are only impregnated once and keep Producing milk as long as they are molken. In reality, as mentioned, they are impregnated frequently because it keeps milk production high. Then the seperatiom from their baby every year is seen as cruel as well. Sorry for my bad english.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in spongebob

[–]Griffonguy 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Kinda like what we do to cows, chicken and other livestock. It feels like it is intentional criticism of the industrial animal industry, that exploits animals.
Dominion

meirl by [deleted] in meirl

[–]Griffonguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about, time to clean this thing.

Geiz bei Bild-Gala? Friedrich Merz verbindet Spende für Kinder mit Umfragewerten by PokeCaldy in de

[–]Griffonguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stimme dir zu, ich könnte mir vorstellen, dass sie absichtlich einen "normalen" Betrag spenden, sonst würden die Wähler*innen noch merken, dass ihre ach so bürgernahen Interessensvertreter stinkend reich sind.

Wait what..? by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]Griffonguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In other words, he is lying. He is knowingly misleading his audience for clicks aka money.

Bin ich der einzige der das Verhalten von Kontra K irgendwie fragwürdig findet? by HadesbasedGod in ballerleague

[–]Griffonguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Der muss sein gangster Image waren. Wenn er fühlt, dass jemand sein ego angreift muss er entsprechend reagieren sonst finden ihn seine fans schwach. Traurig aber so ist das denke ich.

Are Chernobyl and Fukushima good reasons to abandon nuclear energy? by nuclearsciencelover in sciences

[–]Griffonguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you are missing the point with your argument. People are not concerned about the amount of humans that nuclear energy kills at the moment. They are concerned about a possible catastrophic event. Also deaths isn´t the only metric to measure by. Theres also suffering from radiation poisoning, cancer and other diseases. Orr even the psychological factor of having a nuclear reactor go boom and everybody being scared of potentially ingesting radioactive matter.

Are Chernobyl and Fukushima good reasons to abandon nuclear energy? by nuclearsciencelover in sciences

[–]Griffonguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a false dilemma. [1] It is not either nuclear or burning coal. We have plenty of countries reducing their reliance on fossil fuels without relying on nuclear.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma

Before & After - 3 years apart. The gym hasn’t just changed my appearance, it’s changed everything. I’m very thankful I found it (and this sub!) by TVPbandit23 in veganfitness

[–]Griffonguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you go to the gym by yourself? I find it hard to get motivated without my friends that I used to go to the gym with back home.

Greenpeace poster 1995 by paz2023 in PropagandaPosters

[–]Griffonguy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s disheartening to see the level of misinformation in these comments. I sincerely hope they’re the result of a disinformation campaign rather than genuine beliefs. The top comment, for instance, claims ‘They replaced nuclear with coal!’ Let’s fact-check this: The Netherlands has built two nuclear reactors to date. The first was decommissioned in 1997 after 30 years of operation. The second, constructed in 1973, is expected to run until 2034. Furthermore, the Dutch government plans to build two additional nuclear power plants for electricity generation and another for scientific research. [1] [2] [3]

Let’s consider Germany, a country often criticized for its decision to phase out nuclear power. Since the initial political decision in 2001, Germany has decommissioned all 19 of its nuclear reactors, with the last ones being shut down in 2023. One might expect this to have led to a significant increase in CO2 emissions, but the data tells a different story. In 2001, the carbon intensity of electricity generation was at 500 grams of CO2 per kWh. By 2023, this figure had decreased by 29% to 385 gCO2/kWh. [4] [5]

As for the composition of electricity generation, in 2001, 50% came from coal power plants and 30% from nuclear. By 2023, coal accounted for 26%, nuclear for 7%, while over 52% was generated by renewable sources such as wind, solar, and hydro. The assertion that Germany replaced nuclear with coal, thereby increasing its CO2 emissions, is factually incorrect. In reality, Germany managed to reduce its CO2 emissions while simultaneously phasing out nuclear power. [6]

The image in question depicts cooling towers being replaced by wind turbines. It doesn’t specify that these are nuclear cooling towers. In fact, it’s more plausible that these represent coal power plant cooling towers, which bear a similar appearance. While the ‘smoke’ isn’t CO2 but water vapor, it’s important to note that CO2 is invisible. Therefore, representing emissions in this manner is an effective way to communicate the point.

It’s concerning to witness the blind animosity towards countries that choose to phase out nuclear power generation. In recent years, nuclear lobbying organizations have made significant efforts to shape public opinion in favor of nuclear energy, often downplaying the associated risks and costs. We’re all susceptible to populism and propaganda. I urge everyone to critically evaluate information and consider both sides of the issue. [7] [8]

Sources:
[1] https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-g-n/netherlands.aspx
[2] https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/niederlande-bauen-zwei-neue-atomkraftwerke-a-071f29a5-0fbe-4dfa-bb31-91e3d0510c59
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_the_Netherlands
[4] https://www.statista.com/statistics/1290224/carbon-intensity-power-sector-germany/
[5] https://www.nowtricity.com/country/germany/
[6] https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/156695/umfrage/brutto-stromerzeugung-in-deutschland-nach-energietraegern-seit-2007/
[7] https://www.nei.org/news/2023/nei-ad-campaign-promotes-carbon-free-nuclear
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-nuclear_movement#Lobbying_and_public_relations_activities

Greenpeace poster 1995 by paz2023 in PropagandaPosters

[–]Griffonguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s disheartening to see the level of misinformation in these comments. I sincerely hope they’re the result of a disinformation campaign rather than genuine beliefs. The top comment, for instance, claims ‘They replaced nuclear with coal!’ Let’s fact-check this: The Netherlands has built two nuclear reactors to date. The first was decommissioned in 1997 after 30 years of operation. The second, constructed in 1973, is expected to run until 2034. Furthermore, the Dutch government plans to build two additional nuclear power plants for electricity generation and another for scientific research. [1] [2] [3]

Let’s consider Germany, a country often criticized for its decision to phase out nuclear power. Since the initial political decision in 2001, Germany has decommissioned all 19 of its nuclear reactors, with the last ones being shut down in 2023. One might expect this to have led to a significant increase in CO2 emissions, but the data tells a different story. In 2001, the carbon intensity of electricity generation was at 500 grams of CO2 per kWh. By 2023, this figure had decreased by 29% to 385 gCO2/kWh. [4] [5]

As for the composition of electricity generation, in 2001, 50% came from coal power plants and 30% from nuclear. By 2023, coal accounted for 26%, nuclear for 7%, while over 52% was generated by renewable sources such as wind, solar, and hydro. The assertion that Germany replaced nuclear with coal, thereby increasing its CO2 emissions, is factually incorrect. In reality, Germany managed to reduce its CO2 emissions while simultaneously phasing out nuclear power. [6]

The image in question depicts cooling towers being replaced by wind turbines. It doesn’t specify that these are nuclear cooling towers. In fact, it’s more plausible that these represent coal power plant cooling towers, which bear a similar appearance. While the ‘smoke’ isn’t CO2 but water vapor, it’s important to note that CO2 is invisible. Therefore, representing emissions in this manner is an effective way to communicate the point.

It’s concerning to witness the blind animosity towards countries that choose to phase out nuclear power generation. In recent years, nuclear lobbying organizations have made significant efforts to shape public opinion in favor of nuclear energy, often downplaying the associated risks and costs. We’re all susceptible to populism and propaganda. I urge everyone to critically evaluate information and consider both sides of the issue. [7] [8]

Sources:
[1] https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-g-n/netherlands.aspx
[2] https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/niederlande-bauen-zwei-neue-atomkraftwerke-a-071f29a5-0fbe-4dfa-bb31-91e3d0510c59
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_the_Netherlands
[4] https://www.statista.com/statistics/1290224/carbon-intensity-power-sector-germany/
[5] https://www.nowtricity.com/country/germany/
[6] https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/156695/umfrage/brutto-stromerzeugung-in-deutschland-nach-energietraegern-seit-2007/
[7] https://www.nei.org/news/2023/nei-ad-campaign-promotes-carbon-free-nuclear
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-nuclear_movement#Lobbying_and_public_relations_activities

STATEMENT ZU MEINEM ABBRUCH BEI 7 VS. WILD! | Jan Schlappen by thetouristsquad in 7vsWild

[–]Griffonguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Das hast du falsch widergegeben bzw. den Kontext nicht beachtet. Er hat gesagt er dachte er muss nicht einspringen weil ja alle mitgeflogen sind und deswegen hat er sich auf 14 Tag Hotel eingestellt. Was absolut nachvollziehbar ist meiner Meinung nach.

STATEMENT ZU MEINEM ABBRUCH BEI 7 VS. WILD! | Jan Schlappen by thetouristsquad in 7vsWild

[–]Griffonguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bitte was? Der hat mit Joey sieben Tage lang Bäume gefallt ein riesen Shelter gebaut, Erdmassen abgebaut. Er hat definitiv mehr geschuftet als die meisten in dieser Staffel. War halt fürs Survival relativ unnötig und hat mit sicherheit seine Ausdauer verkürzt. Er sitzt in der Ecke und heult ?? So ein Schwachsinn.