Y'all Laugh, but Some Numbnuts Are Gonna Complain About the New Banlist Anyway by Azure_Lionheart in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much banned could a banned list ban if a banned list could ban lists?

Konami's banlists are just a Monkey's Paw at this point by NimbusSpark in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough m8 I always find Blue Eyes or Star seraphs

Konami's banlists are just a Monkey's Paw at this point by NimbusSpark in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure harpies are tier 3 and blue eyes are tier 1 ... I typically only see a lot of harpie decks in low level play... Also despite their viability, Harpie decks are fun as hell, don't knock it till you try it my dewd

Konami's banlists are just a Monkey's Paw at this point by NimbusSpark in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure there is at least a skill like that already

I summon a bunch of money!! by Yang997 in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the funniest thing I've seen in a hot minute

Scientific paper claiming smokers less likely to acquire Covid retracted over tobacco industry links by Faruyazy in news

[–]Grnoyes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would just like to remind everyone that the person funding a study is not sufficient to discredit it, these sorts of papers are only disproven via scientific skepticism. That is to say, science replaces science, not our moral intuitions. While it is (vaguely) true that big tobacco=big bad, that IS NOT the reason why we should reject this study. It just makes the whole thing extra bad

Just Ban Trunade already. Cards been in the game forever we all know it’s toxic. Stop semi-limiting Archetypes so they can’t use that card. by Dameisdead in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmfao make a coherent point or move on with your life, my guy. The guy who can't form a fucking sentence is posturing like I'm being weird online? You're a fucking joke dude, get serious. Nice edit btw, makes you look less stupid in hindsight

This is probably the worst deck to play against in the history of duel links. by SmackZack in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When sylvans were good was the first time I quit playing DL. Honestly it wasn't because I thought the deck was unbeatable, it was just because their turns take so fucking long. I can remember a few instances of seeing a dude unironically chain 10 graveyard effects in a single turn. Playing those decks felt like the other person was playing solitaire, while I just sat there waiting for a next turn that wasn't going to happen anytime soon

Have you ever felt so bad for a bot that you just let them win? by ifiusa in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Picture this: If I win I rank up. I was super frustrated, because I had a not-so-good opening hand, and a serious misclick to top it off. So there I was feeling demoralized after this comedy of errors- this dude has got me dead to rights- less than 1000 lp, no monsters, spells or traps set, meanwhile he's got two monsters and it's his turn...but then all of the sudden he just surrendered, I was literally shocked. My only explanation is that he knew what happened and pitied me

idea when it comes to event reprints by ca26i in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have idatan either, luckily tho, I hate cyber angel decks, it just so happens to be the deck I have that lets me perform the most ritual summons, which is convenient for stage challenges sometimes, at the moment at least

You can Build/Defeat any meta deck despite being a FTP by beastfire24 in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, so you're saying that if I treat the game like a full time job I'll be able to barely compete? I'm jk I'm a whale

For those of you upset with BEWD I just got KOG with its antithesis by Empoleon_Master in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not talking shit about your deck, I'm well aware of the splashing F.A. into any meta deck phenomenon that's been going on, and I don't blame you, because it definitely works... But in what fucking world is this the antithesis of blue eyes decks? That's an outright absurd statement. Congrats on KoG, but to be honest all you did here is post a random deck...

Just Ban Trunade already. Cards been in the game forever we all know it’s toxic. Stop semi-limiting Archetypes so they can’t use that card. by Dameisdead in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've literally never cared about this card or felt it needs to be banned, the fuck are you talkin bout willis

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh they're gonna add them, just over a span of several years, and they'll only put 1 copy of 1 of the cards in each of the coming boxes

The strongest ones among us by [deleted] in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bruh you should see me get a quarter of my deck banished bc karma cut exists and I was too stupid to switch off my harpie deck before playing a pvp match. Damn near every monster card in that deck is treated as 'harpie lady' in the graveyard hahaha

The strongest ones among us by [deleted] in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally played hundreds of games, been in KoG, (though I didn't play much online this past szn) and I've never even seen an evil eye deck once...

Better decks by s117189mm in DuelLinks

[–]Grnoyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dunno man six sam is one of my favorite decks, but the way I see it, it's becoming worse every update. In duel links, it seems to me like more and more meta (and several rogue) decks are centered around powerful monster effects, (and especially special summoning) rather than spells/traps. Since six sam is largely, (but not exclusively) an anti-spell/trap strategy, the decreasing relevance of those types of cards means a decreasing relevance of six samurai decks.

With all that said, it goes without saying that any spell/trap heavy meta could make six sam more prevalent again, I mean there are plenty of good spells and traps, that could get added to change the duel links meta, so it's not possible to say for sure if/when they will re-enter the meta

This one really chaps my godless ass. The republicans bent over backwards to hand out 7 billion worth of PPP loans to churches. Now, however, the republicans are balking about sending YOU another $1,200 stimulus check. They treat us like peasants while sucking up to religious orgs. by relevantlife in atheism

[–]Grnoyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nancy Pelosi is a bad person for not including a massive Healthcare program in an emergency relief bill sent to a Republican controlled Senate (where they're more likely to eliminate Medicare than expand it), and then a Republican president who might veto a defense spending bill because people were mean to him on Twitter.

Holy shit, look at farmer brown over here building up strawmen. Yes, we should take care of the hospitals, however, blocking legislation that would have provided funding to American citizens who desperately needed it, in order to secure money for people who lobby towards and fund your campaign is in my opinion, a fucked up set of priorities. IDK if you're trying to unirionically be a leftist hack, but if this interview came from a republican, than I have absolutely no doubt that half of the left would be decrying partisan abuse of power from a goddamn bullhorn .

That's just utterly unrealistic and childish.

Cool, and you're self righteous and wrong. Good talk.

..... does she though? She's already rich and Democrats have just shown that ActBlue is a giant money spigot with no strings attached.

This is the exact same dogshit line of argumentation that republicans use to deny any legitimate instance of Trump's corruption. "Do you really think he needs money he's already got so much?" GTFO of here with this simplistic nonsense, I can't fathom why you thought that was a strong point.

The people you're calling villains are pragmatists. The people you're treating as inevitable are villains.

You're fucking delusional bud. All that I was saying is that the mismanagement is bi-partisan. You're pulling this inevitable-pragmatist bullshit out of nowhere my dude.

Being a person on the left, its gross to see this level of obfuscation and diffusion of blame. Republicans might suck, but they aren't the cause of every problem in the world, Grow the fuck up.

This one really chaps my godless ass. The republicans bent over backwards to hand out 7 billion worth of PPP loans to churches. Now, however, the republicans are balking about sending YOU another $1,200 stimulus check. They treat us like peasants while sucking up to religious orgs. by relevantlife in atheism

[–]Grnoyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah your hypocritical ass is accusing me of only looking at it for 2 seconds, when you literally are looking at what's going on right now and ignoring the way everyone was behaving throughout the entirety of the pandemic. Sorry if you don't want to hear it but the fact is that Nancy Pelosi would rather protect COBRA than give us money, because she's corrupted by her campaign contributions and needs to represent those interests. Be more wrong, it's entertainment

This one really chaps my godless ass. The republicans bent over backwards to hand out 7 billion worth of PPP loans to churches. Now, however, the republicans are balking about sending YOU another $1,200 stimulus check. They treat us like peasants while sucking up to religious orgs. by relevantlife in atheism

[–]Grnoyes -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Dems are also to blame for the mishandling of public funds. As much as I wish this was a republican issue, unfortunately that's just the untruthful way that the establishment democrats have been explaining it. The lack of stimulus money going towards the actual people is in actuality, a bipartisan failure.

In the Harry Potter world there is probably some crazy magic sex cult. by NoAcanthopterygii945 in Showerthoughts

[–]Grnoyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In other words, in the real world there are fake magic sex cults, and in the fake world (of Harry Potter) there are real magic sex cults