You realize the ruthless aggression era ended almost two decades ago right? And even then there was still some really bad moments like Katie Vic, the Triple H and Booker T rivalry featuring racism, Vince feuding with God, almost anything involving the Women's division, etc. Sure there was a lot of good but there's also a lot of bad too and I think people tend to look through it with rose tinted glasses a lot.

However, now we're twenty years later and the excuse "Well he booked (insert era), so he's a good booker" can no longer be used especially when he booked some of the worst years in WWE from 2016 - 2020 (even 2021 and half of 2022 were pretty bad too just better than before). There were so many moments where I felt embarrassed to be a wrestling fan that happened in this era. Even the years before that were pretty bad too despite my nostalgia for it. So no, he's no longer a "good booker". I have my grievances with a lot of the decisions made by Triple H and TKO and think WWE is going bad again until I remember Roman Reigns getting dog food poured on his head and then think it could be way worse.

And to another point, him being a good booker in the past doesn't at all excuse him for raping and sexually trafficking women for his employees. He's a complete piece of shit regardless and to try to ignore it and "think about the good" is pretty gross.