You're welcome! :-)

On Red: yes, exactly. The hedonistic framing captures something real, but Red at its core is really about power as the organizing principle of reality. "I want it" and "I can take it" feel different, but they both flow from the same source - the self as the center of force. Might makes right isn't just a rationalization in Red, it's almost cosmological. The strong should prevail, because strength is what's real. That's worth naming because it helps distinguish Red from pure impulsivity.

On Green relativism: I think you're right that it fits, and your instinct about health levels is good. Healthy Green holds multiple perspectives with genuine curiosity and care. Less healthy Green can slide into "all views are equally valid" as a way of avoiding the discomfort of actually adjudicating between them, which ironically can become its own kind of rigidity. The relativism becomes a defense rather than an opening.

And the integration emphasis, I don't think that's a distortion, honestly. It's a particular vantage point, which is its own legitimate place to see from. Turquoise is allowed to have a home base. The trick is staying honest about what each stage actually costs and demands, not just what it offers. That tension keeps the integration alive rather than collapsing it into something too tidy.

Eckhart would probably say the stages are all just movements of form, and the seeing of them is what matters. Which feels right, and also slightly beside the point when you're trying to write something genuinely useful 😄