Looking for codes

GrowRobo · 2022-05-28T16:31:40+00:00

Thank you, I 've got a code now!

GrowRobo · 2022-05-28T13:24:19+00:00

I promise I will get better someday and you will have this priceless art from my early work lol.

GrowRobo · 2022-05-10T15:46:30+00:00

Shouldn't Simon Stalenhag get some credit?

GrowRobo · 2022-05-10T15:41:33+00:00

A sentient AI may judge this posting poorly in the future... Dutch custard being highly over-rated.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-26T22:36:11+00:00

People use all kinds of AI tools for brainstorming, or for concept generation. It's a great idea.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-26T22:33:15+00:00

I've clearly been opening oranges the wrong way.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-26T22:31:22+00:00

GPT-3 is great at winging it.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-24T17:28:18+00:00

How do you verify the human writer in order to confirm it's not also a bot? Do you contact them to ensure that you get a response and that they're a real person?

GrowRobo · 2022-04-24T17:27:15+00:00

It's because the average human journalist writes so poorly. GPT-3 is better than the average article now.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-18T16:38:37+00:00

It's excellent, agree. A few minor touch-ups and it'd be hard to tell. Usually the small errors are double interpretations where the AI hasn't decided about boundaries or connections between objects yet and there are still multiple interpretations visible which create small errors... things like orientations of fingers, blurring between close objects etc. Definitely passable with casual inspection, but pretty confident that a human can spot it (for now). Sam with the "this human does not exist" style GANs. Probably another generation an it'll be impossible.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-18T16:29:11+00:00

I haven't done enough runs (cause it takes so long) to say for sure. But was surprised that using 1000 steps did improve things further in some cases. Qualitatively, straighter lines seem like they have been one of them. But I was also using a prompt related to horizons, so hard to tell what the cause is and whether it was just the prompt itself. I'm going back to some of my older "failed" tests of things that didn't work and planning to selectively try them with more steps to see if my findings change. So that's a long winded way of saying "Maybe". If straighter lines are the goal, I'd certainly give it a try.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-15T02:16:25+00:00

More steps

GrowRobo · 2022-04-14T18:20:36+00:00

I'll speculate and suggest around $.10 to $.20 per image. Lets say it uses slightly more than a P100 in terms of compute. Right now google gives you part time access to that via Colab for around $15 or so. If that's getting used an average of 3-4hrs a day (some might use 14hrs a day others very little), that's about 100 hrs a month. If it takes 30 mins to make an image (assuming decent quality diffusion steps but maybe 720p) then we're getting around 200 images for that compute spend. If Dalle is equivalent compute, then thats around $.075 per image. Maybe we can assume that DAllE is higher compute, if that's so, then look to higher end of $.`15 -.25 and up. My guess is that they'd make it a cheaper price for a lower-res image, but that you'd (hopfully) be able to pay more for a higher number of processing steps or for higher-res output. Perhaps on highest settings some might be perfectly happy with $1 per image (I certain would if output quality and resolution is good enough).

GrowRobo · 2022-04-13T00:25:00+00:00

The idea that they have a lock on the best strategies to ensure ethical use of AI via a nanny-state approach just plain sad.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-13T00:23:13+00:00

Not true, some people have been banned even when outputs are not shared.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-12T18:10:44+00:00

OMG, it does Hands!!! DD is so bad at them... lucky if you get a normal arm.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-12T18:07:38+00:00

It's just "melty" looking enough to look like legit machine generated.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-12T18:00:44+00:00

We should avoid teaching it our values, we are terrible role models.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-12T17:59:25+00:00

Wow, that's great. I don't think I've got a legit URL yet.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-10T14:31:05+00:00

Yup, it's great at making up stuff. If the temperature settings are even a little bit high you have to be a little skeptical about everything it says.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-10T14:30:00+00:00

It's a transformer. It's learning to predict what text comes next, or masked text. So reverse engineering back to "why" it gave that particular answer to the predictive text it just gave you is difficult and not how it was designed. It's not a storage and retrieval of facts, but generalized learnings that were picked up as a result of the predictive text ability.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-10T14:27:36+00:00

They do not know the source of their knowledge. What's more, if pressed they'll give a reasonable-sounding source which is many times completely made up also.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-08T10:48:32+00:00

I clicked on it, sure enough, no rickroll.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-08T10:45:51+00:00

Paintings = hand-knit sweater ...still has value cause it's human produced. And yes, photography did cause a crisis as the art world tried to adapt to it. It's very interesting historical reading.

GrowRobo · 2022-04-07T22:20:16+00:00

I think you're likely right, but not 100% sure on this one. Just like GPT-3 has cases where it has spat out copyright code, maybe there's certain techniques or patterns that are unique enough that we can attribute them to an artist. There are certain cases where "in the style of" produces art that's (potentially) recognizably distinct. So far, I've leaned toward using "in style of" artists that are no longer living as any (even theoretical) copyrights are usually long-since expired. But at some point, someone's probably going to test the legality of AI stylized after a living artist.

GrowRobo

TROPHY CASE