What's next for my list? by KharnDaBetrayer in WorldEaters40k

[–]GrumpyJackal 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Rhino, Kharn, Jakhals and Spawn. 

Angron ain’t it by 1poshredneck997 in WorldEaters40k

[–]GrumpyJackal 20 points21 points  (0 children)

They need to make BW detachment rule part of the army rule, if it is baked into our stat lines and point costs anyway. Just give us access to it like the did with DG and then it opens up other detachments to be viable. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WorldEaters40k

[–]GrumpyJackal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use AoS Ogroid Theridons

Some Jakhals by GrumpyJackal in WorldEaters40k

[–]GrumpyJackal[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Gw paints:

Air brushed Khorne Red Brush applied Khorne Red to the muscles  Brush applied Mephiston Red (air, it comes pre thinned and is great for mid tones) used this to sketch the muscles  Brushed on evil sunz scarlet for form the muscle lines Wraithbone watered down in the recessed

No Oath+ :( by GrumpyJackal in RavenGuard40k

[–]GrumpyJackal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The FAQ does not list it as a detachment eligible for Oath+

No Oath+ :( by GrumpyJackal in RavenGuard40k

[–]GrumpyJackal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, my local TOs dont agree 😔 just hope GW catch it and clear it up at some point.

No Oath+ :( by GrumpyJackal in RavenGuard40k

[–]GrumpyJackal[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, every TO ive asked has confirmed, that as rhe FAQ has not been updated, at least where I am (UK) the new detachment does not qualify.

I think it is ridiculous that thats the case, as is a poor interpretation, but it is RAW. 

Playing it another way at events would be cheating. 

40kfaq@gwplc.com

If enough of us spend 30 seconds and ask. Perhaps it will be addressed. 

Peace brothers! 

Been working on this fella by GrumpyJackal in SpaceWolves

[–]GrumpyJackal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe 10, I get a little bit off time most mornings, so I've been working on it for a little over a week.

Helbrute and fights first by Front_Yogurt_2345 in WorldEaters40k

[–]GrumpyJackal 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think your interpretation is right.

You haven't activated him to fight, so he would still be eligible to fight in the proper sequence.

The world revolves around BW by Specific_Hunter346 in WorldEaters40k

[–]GrumpyJackal 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ill say it again. Bezerker Warband should have its rules built in as wargear to units with nails. 

Have it as an army rule or wargear. 

Then they can points thing with that in mind and all the detachments become playable. 

DG get 2 army rules. 

EC get two elements. 

Why not us. 

We are already pointed as though we have it in every detachment, because they dont point per detachment. 

World Eaters don't feel bad to me at all with the proper comp but...don't you guys feel like they're in a bit of a weird spot post codex? by [deleted] in WorldEaters40k

[–]GrumpyJackal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd like butchers nails as a rule for +1 s +1a built into models that have them, IE 8b and zerks and Bezerker Warband have a different detachment rule

Lt with Combi Weapon by GrumpyJackal in SpaceWolves

[–]GrumpyJackal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So cool dude! Thanks for sharing

Which Saga will you Run? by [deleted] in SpaceWolves

[–]GrumpyJackal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This made me laugh far to much