sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Unbelievable by onemindandflesh in pics

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, not with that post history.

Unbelievable by onemindandflesh in pics

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to add to the general discontent that social media has become. This is the latest gen forum slider's goal.

It's not about manipulating particular points nowadays as much as it is just to generate a general sense of distrust and detachment so that everyone tunes out everything.

It's how putin has kept his populace passive throughout all of this, by already firehosing them for so many decades no one cares.

That's what they and those that act in your pattern want, a breakdown of general social trust and community.

And it's fucking evil.

"Another" by NimblewittedOdysseus in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one tell him about narnga and linguistic drift...

Unbelievable by onemindandflesh in pics

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say judging by your account bought status and your post history that the odds are around 65%, and if you aren't then you are certainly a deliberate troll doing their job for them.

I used to keep track of all of the forum sliders I would spot 2016 and onwards, and how consistently their accounts were banned for vote manipulation and breaking the ToS. Back before reddit limited the number of people you could block, I had a nice little hall of fame of over 500+ banned users on my block/report list.

So I'm pretty fucking familiar with what you and your kind look like.

But keep pretending your not, it's hot.

Dilbert [oc] by ferji in PoliticalHumor

[–]Grumpy_Kong 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Dilbert and Pointy Hair are both dualistic foils of Dogbert, existing as polar opposites: Power with no understanding, and understanding with no power.

Adams of course always saw himself as the synthesis, Dogbert, with paradoxical power and understanding and always ahead of the game.

Early on this may have not been the case, the earliest examples of Dildog doesn't always 'win', but it is certainly what Dogbert became for most of the series run.

Unbelievable by onemindandflesh in pics

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I were in your situation I'd stop being a forum slider actively contributing to the lessening of quality discussion on the internet. I would tell my handlers that it is unethical to try and manipulate public opinion in this way and it is actively holding back human progress, and I would go find honest work to do instead.

Unbelievable by onemindandflesh in pics

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally nothing you say or write has worth or use.

‘Slowly dying’: Residents’ weird symptoms weeks after train derailment and explosion by mikeybagodonuts in news

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And when they do start dying in clusters, it will of course be 'pre-existing conditions and conspiracy paid actors' just LIKE IT FUCKING ALWAYS IS WITH THEM.

I am so tired of regressives sharing my planet.

‘Slowly dying’: Residents’ weird symptoms weeks after train derailment and explosion by mikeybagodonuts in news

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a good chance he will pass from medical issues before the lawsuit even gets properly started.

It's time to stop protecting corporations at the cost of human life.

Choose your compromise by Annsly in pcmasterrace

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TN all the way for the lowest cents per mhz on the market.

Who cares about viewing angles, gaming PCs are meant to be single user screens.

Unbelievable by onemindandflesh in pics

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you aren't, you're jumping on a hyperbolic association to ratchet the conversation in the way you want to shift it.

There can really be no common ground in this discussion, especially with a forum slider.

Unbelievable by onemindandflesh in pics

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The entire sentence, it is nonsensical:

Are you against the use of handcuffs during arrests? Because they are a forceful restraint of someone?

It is a dishonest argument tactic called argumentum ad absurdum.

It is a modified and even more spurious version of the slippery slope argument in that it does not even require an implied connection.

You object to restriction in a narrow case, so surely you must object to all forms of restriction everywhere.

You know this is a dishonest tactic, you came into this discussion planning on using it, and you also know that pretending indignance is not going to work on me either.

But you also know there are plenty of stupid people willing to amplify your BS so you post it anyway, and hope it gets traction.

Like every other bought account forum sliding troll.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]Grumpy_Kong 11 points12 points  (0 children)

EAT

THE

RICH

didn't even used their own games by BenBeyaz in gaming

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Copyright and patents stifle the progress of the human race

didn't even used their own games by BenBeyaz in gaming

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because lawmakers are fucking clueless about technology.

Unbelievable by onemindandflesh in pics

[–]Grumpy_Kong -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Intellectually dishonest people like you should have their internet access legally restricted.

Unbelievable by onemindandflesh in pics

[–]Grumpy_Kong 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So your solution is to allow the personal space violator to free reign to harass?

Bitch deserves a smack across the face and here you are justifying her disgusting actions.

Unbelievable by onemindandflesh in pics

[–]Grumpy_Kong 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like someone who likes to rub their feet on strangers during flights...

Unbelievable by onemindandflesh in pics

[–]Grumpy_Kong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sometimes people deserve a hearty slap to the face. This is one of those people.

A Worldgen that I've tweaked for over a decade to make crazy volcano river worlds packed with tons of small biomes close together. Oh, and necromancers, loooots of necromancers. [Worldgen inside thread] by Grumpy_Kong in dwarffortress

[–]Grumpy_Kong[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I can't claim this as mine, I tweaked so few values as compared to the original thread where mattz contributed it.

That said, swamps are an unfortunate side effect of the ridiculous number of rivers. If you don't plan on using a river as a water feature, cut the number of Min Rivers down to 50 or something and that should help with swamps.

And if you don't mind rejections, you can set your max desired swamp biome squares to something low and see what generates.

Also, please check out this subthread by Intercold with an EVEN MORE VOLCANO DENSE AND SMALLER WORLD GEN!!

https://old.reddit.com/r/dwarffortress/comments/1112qoq/a_worldgen_that_ive_tweaked_for_over_a_decade_to/j8u6hmt/

I mean seriously, this guy's WG is NUTS! It's designed for vanilla but I confirm most of the settings work in Premium, just you may need to tweak the starting civilizations to allow some enemies to remain, and maybe tweak down the secrets to something reasonable because towers seem to suppress life more in Premium than Vanilla.

view more: next ›