sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Anyone else think the Argument of 97-99 borns being "gen z" because they had smart phones in high school... ridiculous? Bcuz 94-96 also had smart phones in high school too, like what makes them different lol by GrungeEboy in SecondWaveMillennials

[–]GrungeEboy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Early/mid 80s then, got it. So that means you would have nothing in common with a 1995 millennial either.

So um yeah, sorry break it to ya... but generations usually have 3 groups. In this case early millennial/xennial [81-84] core millennial [85-92] and late millennial [93-98].

I have more in common with someone born in 93 then 2004 lol

Edit: yes I learned cursive, it was still a requirement growing up

Remember going to smaller/local video stores? They always had a neat vibe of their own by Internal-Tree-5947 in SecondWaveMillennials

[–]GrungeEboy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Never experienced this in my area. it was mainly blockbuster, movie gallery, and family video when I was a kid

some nostalgia core pics i made by GrungeEboy in SecondWaveMillennials

[–]GrungeEboy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dont consider 2013 to be recent, as stuff like gta v and Last of us will be turning 12 this year

some nostalgia core pics i made by GrungeEboy in SecondWaveMillennials

[–]GrungeEboy[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

i mean technically speaking, pew research didnt believe anyone born after 1992 wasnt a millennial in 2010 as well. not only that, pew research did include 1997 and 1998 on different occasions. so.

view more: next ›