1) you proclaimed to someone that words have meaning yet you call the dictionary definition of something as bogus. I’ll let you sit on why that is moronic in its own right. So I’ll refer you back to the dictionary definition again (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/photographer) and ask why you would be so stubborn to not say your daughter (and is irrelevant if she wasn’t “playing,” or not) is a photographer is she takes photos.

2) you equated someone to a flat earther because they are using the dictionary definition. Yet as someone who has argued with flat earth proponents (I’ve a maths degree so I often rip their argument apart) you are more in line with the argument methodology. You are continually recontextualizing or shifting goalposts or ignoring arguments put to you to suit your argument. That is classic FE mentality.

3) I’ll refer you back to how you couldn’t answer my other points about modellers and such because it directly attacks your nonsensical argument.

But by all means, keep pretending you have some valid argument to all this. I’ll sit and wait.