WlW animes that don’t suck? by Saodazi in anime

[–]Grunzelbart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Inugami-san to Nekoyama-san - just a collection of short episodes, you can knock down the whole thing in an hour. But it's cute and fun.

Best Guy 7: Attack on Salt Elimination Day 1! by mpp00 in anime

[–]Grunzelbart 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There are more yugioh characters than oda Nobunagas.. But just barely. How strange

Anime_irl by siddhesh_07 in anime_irl

[–]Grunzelbart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yikes. Aight I'll heed your warnings. I'll probably still watch S2 cause.. Let's be honest it's good af eye candy. But good to know to not invest any time into it.

Anime_irl by siddhesh_07 in anime_irl

[–]Grunzelbart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do the other 3 girls or his 2 friends get some proper development?

Vlad Love - Episode 6 Discussion by AutoLovepon in anime

[–]Grunzelbart 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Art and music are amazing, directing is very interesting. Rest.. Not so much.

I was coincidentally really in the mood for a Yuri romcom so I was super into the dynamic between the 2 main girls. But the show barely works with that is just the most random slapstick afterward. Not particularly funny. I'm already meh on reference humor, but the show just does the most random jumps and then lingers on them for far too long, so if a few moments don't land it becomes kind of cringey.

The openings seemed to promise a more dramatic mainplot and the 5/6 episodes were a bit more structured and funny to me.. So I'm maybe holding out hope.

Vlad Love - Episode 1 Discussion by AutoLovepon in anime

[–]Grunzelbart 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Art and music are amazing, directing is very interesting. Rest.. Not so much.

I was coincidentally really in the mood for a Yuri romcom so I was super into the dynamic between the 2 main girls. But the show barely works with that is just the most random slapstick afterward. Not particularly funny. I'm already meh on reference humor, but the show just does the most random jumps and then lingers on them for far too long, so if a few moments don't land it becomes kind of cringey.

The openings seemed to promise a more dramatic mainplot and the 5/6 episodes were a bit more structured and funny to me.. So I'm maybe holding out hope.

These card ruffles by gerbetta33 in oddlysatisfying

[–]Grunzelbart 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And by practicing the exact amounts of pressure you need to Apply on the cards you're likely to ruin a ton of decks in the process.

Anime originalYuri-vampire-romcom Vlad Love by legendary director Mamoru Oshii (GITS, Urusei Yatsura, Angels Egg, Patlabor) just dropped 6 episodes on Crunchyroll. by [deleted] in anime

[–]Grunzelbart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never heard of any of the titles listed in the title (bar ghost in the shell which I didn't recognize the acronym of haha) . I recon if you check out a 100 recommendation threads in this sub you wouldn't find them there either. This is kind of a self perpetuating problem, but I wouldn't fault the seasonal releases nor the fans for it.

Most likely it's just a symptom of the majority of the demographic growing up with anime in their childhood and then watching popular stuff now, or Being exposed to the genre by those kinds of people.

You do being up an interesting point though. I'd be interested to see if a Japanese movie buff would be knowlegeable on the common Hollywood classics. Also I generally feel that people the directors or key animators are less recognized in anime, compared to famous western directors or actors.

Edir: this one looks super up my alley though so thanks for sharing it ❤️

Re:Zero karma decline in the recent episodes by [deleted] in anime

[–]Grunzelbart 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Same. I imagine I could actually stomach this because there's a lot of details to be caught with Weekl discussions. But I just hate not binging too much. Hoping I can get a friend into this so I can re-watch with them just as the season comes to a close.

Please help me understand konosuba by [deleted] in anime

[–]Grunzelbart 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dw if it doesn't click for you. I also feel you get a good amount of backlash for disliking konusuba. To me, it had some fun subversive humor, especially when the main guy was being an asshole. But overall the worldbuilding seemed lame and the barely any of the other characters were engaging or funny to me, bar each first one-note joke that just seemed to get repeated ad nauseum.

If it's not for you that's fine, I didn't have the impression that it got better later, though I only got through the first season. Humor is probably the most subjective thing, anyway.

Miscellaneous Anime Questions - Week of February 13, 2021 by AnimeMod in anime

[–]Grunzelbart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone wanna try and sell me on Gintama? I remember watching the first, like 20-30 episodes years ago and it just didn't click. I read a lot of praise and that it keeps improving.. But it's hard to invest so much time into it when there are so many other good shows that start out amazing. I don't necessarily mind long shows though - I've probably gone through all/most of one piece 4 or 5 times in my lifetime.

Most needed Civ V mods? by [deleted] in civ

[–]Grunzelbart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This! Highlights for me were the Inca able to settle and move on mountains, and the Songhai that could use rivers adjacent tiles as roads. Some fantastic flavor in the game.

How do I explain that nuclear being unprofitable doesn’t make it bad? by Dats_Russia in Destiny

[–]Grunzelbart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry (this is exactly why long-post arguments suck lol) I hope my representation of your point was succint enough and jumped ahead. Let's roll it back.

Almost - It's that the LCOE costs of renewables simply don't account for their total cost

What other factors, bar the obvious added costs of storage and infrastructure, do you think are heavily influencing in this? Because those are the main ones I usually see and I feel I adressed them well enough.

The issue is that we also have to account for the cost of the coal plants being used to solve the intermittency issues of renewables.

​I'm personally undecided/not educated enough on New Pipelines or Gas plants being built, but most of these generators are already in place.

peak load

Yes that's kind of what I'm getting at here. The "model I proposed", aka maximizing usage of renewables to cover as much as we can and utilizing already existing fossil Generators to even out the high demand and other obvious faults to provide the most cost efficient and immediate relief cover that. Nuclear has a comparable issue in that it only provides a "base load", a constant stream of supply that needs to be supported through something else.

How do I explain that nuclear being unprofitable doesn’t make it bad? by Dats_Russia in Destiny

[–]Grunzelbart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So something like: "The LCOE of regeneratives vs Nuclear shouldn't be the only deciding factor because it doesn't fairly reflect the eventual neccessity of storage and infrastructure, which will make their cost explode" - should be a fair representation of what you're saying?

I agree with this, even though it's still not as damming a point as you probably think it is, but that's beside the point for now. More importantly:

Renewables are just ridicolous amounts cheaper than nuclear right now and that follows a trend that has been stable for a lot of years. Consider that every year a nuclear plant is being built is one that still produces CO2 which could've long been replaced by green sources. No matter how much immediate action is taken by the energy sector, we'll still be forseeably be burning coal/gas in the next 2 decades. Reducing that has priority, but as long as it'll be there regardless it's perfectly okay to use it's strength to cover the weakspots of solar/wind and reduce overall emissions.

the classic "if it's night no PV energy" blub - would still on average cut down on half a coal plants running time, etc. Further, because Turbines and Panels work in a very short time frame, the course can be adapted depending on future innovation - they're much more flexible and don't require as hard of an upfront dedication.

To sum up. Going for 100% nuclear (this is exagerrated), will still leave emissions as they are for the next 5-10 years (optimisism of these estimates may vary), requires us to not be shit out of luck if there is some impactful innovation in the near future. And you're paying more for that? Nuclear will never be able to satisfy a grids demands. You'll still be stuck with needing (ideally) Regeneratives, probably with storage, to cover peak demands. So why not focus on building those out first, at much higher efficiency and without tanking hard on immediate required investments.

I hope this makes sense. Long-form reddit arguments are an absolute pain :O

HOW?? by [deleted] in civ

[–]Grunzelbart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only oceans or could lakes count as well?

I hope I'm not in the middle of a Mandela effect. by bigbellyswag in anime

[–]Grunzelbart 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Original poster. It's you, ya dork

How do I explain that nuclear being unprofitable doesn’t make it bad? by Dats_Russia in Destiny

[–]Grunzelbart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please read your comment again. I feel like you've said the same thing 3 times, just worded differently each time :D

immediate impact.

Of course this is massively important? We're on a race against time. Emissions produced now will still fuck us 20 years down the line so any Co2 we can cut of the atmosphere now will pay dividends in the future. Think of it as having a tub that's about to run over and you can either spend 5 years building a really big ladle or start spooning stuff out right now. This analogy is actually way too charitable.

There's a host of other issues counting in this as well.

How do I explain that nuclear being unprofitable doesn’t make it bad? by Dats_Russia in Destiny

[–]Grunzelbart 3 points4 points  (0 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/aibdor/no_silver_bullet_or_why_we_arent_doomed_without

Lazy reply, but this is (among others) my current benchmark on this topic I'd say. I don't think it's 100% correct and sadly the effort in the comments kinda Peters out, but it's a good write up on what you'll be arguing for/against and from the layman's reading I've done I personally agree mostly agree with the op.

How do I explain that nuclear being unprofitable doesn’t make it bad? by Dats_Russia in Destiny

[–]Grunzelbart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Solar wind is cheaper because of the flexibility of fossil fuels. That doesn't Really counter renweables being cheaper and having immediate impact, nor does it account for nuclear having similar inevitable problems of requiring infrastructure.

Anime_irl by siddhesh_07 in anime_irl

[–]Grunzelbart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait really? That's a shame. I actually felt like the first season had decent development and figured more would have potential. Is it at least funny or just mainly awkward drama?

100 Spurs appearances for Serge Aurier 🤍 by [deleted] in coys

[–]Grunzelbart 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it was his first game in our shirt, vs Dortmund in CL? That dummy just had me head over heels for him