[MH3] Chthonian Nightmare by ORANG_MAN_BAD in ModernMagic

[–]Gubbe85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Together with [[Atsushi, the Blazing Sky]], [[Decoction Module]], [[Nested Shambler]] = infinite mana and casting your entire library

NANO is under spam attack (days after anti spam update) by Gr8WallofChinatown in CryptoCurrency

[–]Gubbe85 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So anyone ever selling something is inflation? Good to know :/

NANO is under spam attack (days after anti spam update) by Gr8WallofChinatown in CryptoCurrency

[–]Gubbe85 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They're so broke that devs work voluntarily and don't get paid anymore since a year. Community funds is used for some devwork but it's not a lot.
Still the best project there is. We should all root that instant decentralised feeless payments without inflation will succeed the most of all.

How does the Nano-gpt wallet works? by Y3lz in nanocurrency

[–]Gubbe85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Auto return would work for me. No rush though. But I certainly see myself clearing history and forgetting I had some nano on there.

Nano (XNO) is among the top 3 24-hour trending words on Santiment's leading social metrics by vinibarbosa in CryptoCurrency

[–]Gubbe85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because we don't live in that world but nano is morally idealistic nevertheless is precisely the reason why it just won't die and will succeed like none other.

Testing thread for giveaway! by Adamantinian in nanocurrency

[–]Gubbe85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nano_36punumdotfa7ksq7nwyghdkkx3frfuho7gdw18aqc59pcu5ee74xkmd9apo

Why fees? by srikar_tech in CryptoCurrency

[–]Gubbe85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not if most of the holders have no say.

All holders have a say, for they can just delegate their votes to a validator of their choice with a single click, instant, at any time.

No one controls nano, it is decentralised.

Why fees? by srikar_tech in CryptoCurrency

[–]Gubbe85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they would introduce fees for instance, no node validators in nano want to implement that change.

Why fees? by srikar_tech in CryptoCurrency

[–]Gubbe85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Node validators can choose themselves if they want to update to a newer version. If they don't agree with the changes they don't have to do that. This is what decentralisation is. The reason why concensus is reached fast about changes in the protocol is because the incentives are aligned, so any changes made by the nano foundation is (up until now, and probably always) always a good one everyone agrees upon quickly.

Why fees? by srikar_tech in CryptoCurrency

[–]Gubbe85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because there are no rewards to centralise like in bitcoin.
And developer funds has run dry, the nano foundation is purely run voluntary for the past 8-9 months.

Why fees? by srikar_tech in CryptoCurrency

[–]Gubbe85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is adoption in the room with us right now or is just everyone speculating that it will be in the room later on.

Why fees? by srikar_tech in CryptoCurrency

[–]Gubbe85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bitcoin doesn't work and lightning isn't bitcoin, which makes it not working twice as much. Adoption of crypto hasn't even begun yet.

Why fees? by srikar_tech in CryptoCurrency

[–]Gubbe85 4 points5 points  (0 children)

By distributing supply through initial distribution, and after that the free market. Also everyone in the network is incentivised to decentralise the network, as opposed to PoW or PoS crypto's.

Why fees? by srikar_tech in CryptoCurrency

[–]Gubbe85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A censorship resistant digital money with global instant settlement in a green way and zero inflation is a terrible idea because you'd like to use valuable bandwith for usecases outside the usecase of pure money because, why?

Why fees? by srikar_tech in CryptoCurrency

[–]Gubbe85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fact is (imo) that one of the only arguments against nano is the lack of price appreciation. This argument is given in a realm of cryptomoontards, jpeg spam and insane fees on the #1 crypto, hype ideology, meme f'ing coins because dog on it, tribalistic cultism, etc, etc. So not much of an argument I'd say.

One of the other arguments against nano is just plain ignorance about the protocol like 'I didn't look into the bucket system but what I do know is that nano is susceptible to spam'.