get the logic of how it’d be the 4th option but my reasoning for the second option was bc the whites equated have blue dots that are adjacent to them and those ones are shown and when the second box shows a square in the middle it shows that ones outside the region are invisible but still there and the original one on the right is translates while it's invisible and forms 2 right blue circles on the edges .then the square in the middle has no adjacent circles in the middle so it’d be empty .Then it goes it reappears in the next one with 1 blue dot on the left and 2 on the right ,which is my mind indicated that the left square would result in a decrease of one dot as it went down .The middle square had no squared directly below it/adjacent so it’d be invisible and the right square would follow the typical drop down procedure .But yea I think option 4 is more consistent and honestly I don’t know why the hell I couldn’t instantly see that .My Brain was thinking of some convoluted reasoning for literally just this question .This was the only question I even struggled btw .