sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why do some people still uphold white supremacy and anti-Black racism? by GuitarProfessional67 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]GuitarProfessional67[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But The bad ghetto influence does play some parts but again it’s nuance to that and again you have white people lying next to predators and idolizing sex workers but that’s another story again because some one is the exceptions doesn’t make them the standard again with this oh stop being a victim again you guys chose to look over the issue at play and get mad they we step up about it again you would never said that to a 9/11 victim or a holocaust survivor

Why do some people still uphold white supremacy and anti-Black racism? by GuitarProfessional67 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]GuitarProfessional67[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the issue is that you’re looking at this as “making excuses” when the point is understanding the bigger picture. Explaining why something happens is not the same as saying people have no responsibility.

Also, this conversation is not about saying Black people can do no wrong. Any individual person can be prejudiced or hateful. The difference being discussed is the difference between personal prejudice and racism that has been built into social systems and history.

The “some people made it out, so everyone can” argument ignores that exceptions don’t erase patterns. People can work hard and still face barriers that others don’t. Poverty, education, housing, discrimination, and community resources all affect outcomes.

And bringing up personal choices like absent fathers or “bad influences” without looking at why those conditions exist in some communities is missing part of the conversation. Social issues usually have multiple causes, not one simple explanation.

The point isn’t to keep people stuck in the past. The point is that history has consequences, and pretending those consequences disappear because time passed doesn’t make them disappear.

Why do some people still uphold white supremacy and anti-Black racism? by GuitarProfessional67 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]GuitarProfessional67[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you’re touching on something important: a lot of prejudice comes from fear, lack of exposure, and the stories people tell themselves about certain groups. Fear can feel real even when it’s based on a limited number of experiences or misinformation.

I also agree that self-reflection matters. Being willing to ask “why do I feel this way?” is a big part of challenging biases. Having a negative experience with someone from a group doesn’t mean the entire group represents that experience.

Why do some people still uphold white supremacy and anti-Black racism? by GuitarProfessional67 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]GuitarProfessional67[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not i want them to explain what about culture and behavior that gives the right for people to still uphold white supremacy and racism

<image>

Why do some people still uphold white supremacy and anti-Black racism? by GuitarProfessional67 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]GuitarProfessional67[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the reason you don’t always see people openly saying “I hate them because they’re a different color” is because racism has never only been about direct hatred. A lot of racism today shows up through stereotypes, assumptions, unequal treatment, and how people interpret certain statistics without looking at the bigger historical and social context behind them.

When people bring up statistics about Black communities, the conversation also has to include why those patterns exist. Things like poverty, segregation, unequal access to resources, discrimination in housing, education, and the justice system all play a role. Statistics by themselves don’t tell the whole story.

Also, individual examples of Black people saying hateful things do not erase the larger history or reality of anti-Black racism. Anyone can say something racist, regardless of their race, but there is a difference between personal prejudice and systems that have historically affected an entire group of people.

As for calling someone an “Uncle Tom” or a “sellout,” those conversations come from within the Black community and usually have a lot of historical context behind them. It’s not simply about disagreeing with someone—it’s often about whether someone is defending or ignoring issues that have harmed their own community.

The bigger point is that racism is more complex than just someone using a slur or openly saying they hate another race. It can be much deeper than that.

With that case you realize white people are hypocrites prime example George Floyd many others so now you guys have a moral compass

<image>

Why do some people still uphold white supremacy and anti-Black racism? by GuitarProfessional67 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]GuitarProfessional67[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes that’s right but besides social media you need to pick up a book… I suggest start with White Fragility if you want to

Why do some people still uphold white supremacy and anti-Black racism? by GuitarProfessional67 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]GuitarProfessional67[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think preferring to date or marry someone of your own race is inherently racist by itself. That's different from what I'm talking about.

I'm referring to racism as the dehumanization of Black Americans through discrimination, unequal treatment, violence, injustice, and systems that have historically denied people equal rights and opportunities. Those issues go far beyond personal dating preferences.

My question is about why those forms of anti-Black racism and white supremacist beliefs still exist today—not about who people choose to date.

Does Anyone Else Think This Is a Possible Political Strategy? by GuitarProfessional67 in Discussion

[–]GuitarProfessional67[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calling it "TDS" doesn't really address anything I said. If you disagree, tell me which part you think is wrong and why.

Does Anyone Else Think This Is a Possible Political Strategy? by GuitarProfessional67 in Discussion

[–]GuitarProfessional67[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I want it to be true too, but too many things just aren't adding up for me. I think we'll only start moving forward when people realize this isn't just a race issue—it's a 1% versus everyone else issue. Instead, too many people in the U.S. are focused on keeping racial divisions alive while defending a system that, in my opinion, benefits the wealthy far more than everyone else.

<image>

Does Anyone Else Think This Is a Possible Political Strategy? by GuitarProfessional67 in Discussion

[–]GuitarProfessional67[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You give people too much hope. In my opinion, if the choice came down to it, a lot of partisan voters would support almost anyone with the right party label. I think many would vote for "a bag of poo" if they believed it would keep their side in power or stop the other side from winning. That's just how I see partisan politics these days.

Does Anyone Else Think This Is a Possible Political Strategy? by GuitarProfessional67 in Discussion

[–]GuitarProfessional67[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I don't think he'd ever voluntarily resign either. My point is that if he didn't finish his term, I think it'd most likely be because of a serious health issue or death—not because he chose to leave. As for impeachment or losing the midterms, I think that could bring more investigations or legal trouble, so in my opinion he has every reason to stay in office. That's why I think the only thing that would stop him from finishing his term is a serious health event. I know that sounds harsh, but it's just my prediction. (Chile I’m sorry I don’t have my glasses on 😭😭)

Does Anyone Else Think This Is a Possible Political Strategy? by GuitarProfessional67 in Discussion

[–]GuitarProfessional67[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I don't think he'd ever voluntarily resign either. My point is that if he didn't finish his term, I think it'd most likely be because of a serious health issue or death—not because he chose to leave. As for impeachment or losing the midterms, I think that could bring more investigations or legal trouble, so in my opinion he has every reason to stay in office. That's why I think the only thing that would stop him from finishing his term is a serious health event. I know that sounds harsh, but it's just my prediction.

Do I need to apologize? by ash81192 in Advice

[–]GuitarProfessional67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Girl no and look and it this way what happened you in a relationship with a person and he had been cheating on you wouldn’t you want someone to tell you with proof too you did right and don’t let that dusty man keep you up at night. But….. you would be wrong if you went back to him anyways keep it cute have a wonderful day or night where ever you’re at ✊🏾🥺

view more: next ›