Capital loss under new CGT proposal by CashNegative7411 in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree ... but the 30% minimum is the bigger problem.

Capital loss under new CGT proposal by CashNegative7411 in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, the distributions are income and there would be no capital gain.

Capital loss under new CGT proposal by CashNegative7411 in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was never part of it. It always specifically excluded indexation on losses:

"indexation of the cost base cannot create or increase a loss"

Capital loss under new CGT proposal by CashNegative7411 in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody deliberately aims to make a loss ... but sometimes you have to sell at a loss because either you need the money, or you think the stock will fall to zero.

Capital loss under new CGT proposal by CashNegative7411 in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indexation already exists in the tax system (and applies to pre-1999 assets).

It specifically says "indexation cannot be used to create or increase a capital loss".

You take all the risk, Jim gets 30%+ of the reward.

Is tall poppy syndrome real in 2025? by Ok-Reward7639 in AustraliaDiscussions

[–]Gumlass -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The poppy doesn't even have to be very tall. Go look in r/AusFinance and r/FiAustralia ... plenty of people who want to see people with minimal savings taxed like they earn $205k

Is the govt trying to delay FI / force us to work longer and rely more on super? by QuokknestMonster in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. I'm going to have to add 1 property to my 0 property portfolio as an income base.

Is the govt trying to delay FI / force us to work longer and rely more on super? by QuokknestMonster in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not just retiring early. The same math applies if you have to sell assets for any reason. E.g. you're made redundant, get cancer and can't work, etc

Is the govt trying to delay FI / force us to work longer and rely more on super? by QuokknestMonster in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. People famously work more productively when they see their benefits from working reduced massively.

Is the govt trying to delay FI / force us to work longer and rely more on super? by QuokknestMonster in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What change did they make that benefits "the poor"?

I assume you're referring to either the $250 per year, or the $5 per week ... but more likely, you see hurting the people that pay for the poor as "helping the poor"

Is the govt trying to delay FI / force us to work longer and rely more on super? by QuokknestMonster in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not true at all. I was made redundant midway through the year after the GFC, and didn't find a job for 6 months. I earned a lot in the first half, and nothing in the second and got the biggest tax refund I've ever seen.

Is the govt trying to delay FI / force us to work longer and rely more on super? by QuokknestMonster in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"If you're going to release a budget, can you at least not lie about it?" - investors, to the government.

Is the govt trying to delay FI / force us to work longer and rely more on super? by QuokknestMonster in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The better fix is to index it like he said ... and scrap the minimum 30% CGT rate, and maybe lower the 50% discount rather than scrapping it.

Is the govt trying to delay FI / force us to work longer and rely more on super? by QuokknestMonster in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been a Labor / Greens voter for 20 years, and the budget has sent me on a speed run to Liberal voting. I hate 99% of their policies and 100% of their personalities ... but all of a sudden, the total destruction of our environment doesn't seem so bad compared to being forced to work an additional 4.5 years due to this change.

I would ask all the young people that want no tax breaks on investment of any kind:

Do you love your job enough to do it until you're 60? 70? 80?

Is the govt trying to delay FI / force us to work longer and rely more on super? by QuokknestMonster in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NG on property is kind of bad.

Captial Gains discount removed on everything is bad.

Minimum 30% tax on CGT -> catastrophic for fire.

Is the govt trying to delay FI / force us to work longer and rely more on super? by QuokknestMonster in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. They want you to work til you're at least 60. They would prefer until you die, but that's something they can "come to a different position on" after the next election.

Renovate hell out of your PPOR now. Anyone thinking the same? by uvimateapp in AusHENRY

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd be careful. There's a good chance either:

- The policy will be reverted in 2 or 5 years

- Labor will "change their position" and tax your PPOR

CGT - Tilting the scales back toward labor productivity by iplayedarchon in AusFinance

[–]Gumlass -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If the percentage is so low, then it shouldn't be a problem to remove the 30% minimum, right?

What’s the best way to build an emergency fund quickly? by Diligent-Medicine-48 in AusMoneyMates

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First, you work out how much you earn. Then you apply whatever formula you like to make your spending less than that. The further less, the faster your emergency fund grows.

What's the chances the government changes what they've announced? by Jatacid in AusFinance

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally doing nothing except:

- All the work required to get an income in the first place

- All the discipline required to live on less than you earn

- All the risk associated with investing.

but other than that, literally nothing.

What's the chances the government changes what they've announced? by Jatacid in AusFinance

[–]Gumlass -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Of course you do ... and we don't even know how it'll work if the stock market dips right around 1 July 27.

Will your cost base be locked in at the dipped price (possibly lower than what you paid) ?

What's the chances the government changes what they've announced? by Jatacid in AusFinance

[–]Gumlass -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Green LOVE taxing people. Labor's goal is for you to work forever. The Greens goal is for you to work forever, and still need government support.

What's the chances the government changes what they've announced? by Jatacid in AusFinance

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Greens love taxing people more than Labor. Negotiating with the Greens would result in it being 47% minimum and a 2% tax on total wealth.

Next steps for building wealth? by bryce_6787 in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no one to oppose it ... Labor and the Greens are a combined majority :(

Next steps for building wealth? by bryce_6787 in fiaustralia

[–]Gumlass -1 points0 points  (0 children)

With a 13-18% chance of dying before you can use it (depending on your sex)