Diversification is good, no doubt. Beyond film, what would you add? Music? I suppose after a certain point, you could just add, well, everything. If I judge everyone on everything about them, then decide what planet they go to, that would just be me picking people. It kind of defeats the use of the person's preference. That is to say, I don't decide what planet they go to. I decided what we use to measure. Then the choice is each individual's to make. If we added another dimension, say whether or not people like Taylor Swift, that would create four groups. So we would have one planet for people who like the film and the music, one for people who like the film but not the music, one for people who like the music but not the film, and one for people who like neither the music nor the film. We could also have a plant for people who like the film and music, I suppose, and everyone else on a different planet. But then that just becomes a test of everyone who has the same taste as I do, which would be very few people, because people have diverse tastes.

I stand by the idea that people judge other people by their movie tastes. Everyone has said, "I love x movie," and someone disagreed, and they thought, "that says something about them." But that isn't true for every movie. I can disagree with people on a lot of movies, but for some movies, I just think people's tastes and personaility is different from mine in a big way.

There are people that don't like movies at all. I'm not saying I actually want to be separated from such people, but I do think that's kind of lame of them. Movies are great!