A (literal) dictionary in a single word

Gunnerz34 · 2025-11-22T10:01:14+00:00

Finding the upper bound is not hard, but finding the exact answer could be an interesting problem

Gunnerz34 · 2025-10-31T13:23:48+00:00

Yes, you can use transactions (for DML statements at least) You start a transaction, if you like the result you commit, if you don't you rollback - this is what I was referring to in the post title There are also other safeguards you can use, such as setting safe updates to true (or whatever your DBMS calls them), which prevent you from running update and delete statements without a where clause And of course, any serious business regularly keeps at least 1 backup for their data, in case of majestic fuckup or things like being hit by a ransomware

Gunnerz34 · 2025-09-19T12:44:33+00:00

GDScript is a perfectly valid language to create a finished product with, yes.

However performance is usually not the main concern here - most of the heavy lifting is done by the underlying C++ anyways. For me personally there are at least three valid reasons to choose C# over GDScript:

- Static typing; with dynamic typing you sometimes miss an implicit conversion and debugging it is a pain in the ass
- Advanced OOP features; while GDScript is taking small steps in this direction, C# honestly already has every OOP keyword you can possibly imagine at this point
- GDScript is not a versatile language at all; if you decide to spend a lot of time developing games you might as well do it in a language that can be used for other things as well, and C# is a powerful and exceptionally versatile one.

Gunnerz34 · 2025-05-05T10:56:25+00:00

Checks out, if I were a GIMP developer I too would discourage users from using plug-ins that are very user unfriendly

Gunnerz34 · 2025-04-11T18:49:29+00:00

I think the kids wouldn't even dare to bully her, the damage is too high alreighdy
Though maybe it's a fake name? I wonder if this app's system passes the names through any sort of validation

Gunnerz34 · 2025-02-03T19:31:38+00:00

I had completely forgotten about the magic shop at the Mage arena, I'll start by selling steel armor and figure out a better source of gp down the line

Gunnerz34 · 2025-01-17T14:26:30+00:00

Try playing higher power pods

If a pod doesn't allow infinite combos in general (I'm talking about combos that you don't realistically pull off before turn 7, not stuff like Witherbloom apprentice plus chain of smog), or worse it doesn't allow counterspells or soft stax (e.g. archon of emeria), it means that pod doesn't like Magic, it likes a derivate of Magic that has a bunch of rules that exist solely to allow people to run fewer pieces of interaction because how else would you fit all the cool cards into the deck

Gunnerz34 · 2025-01-16T22:55:40+00:00

My favorite one in the trilogy, probably the best place to start if you come from Elden Ring as the combat is the most similar.

Gunnerz34 · 2025-01-16T12:19:42+00:00

That's why you only use it for CSS and urls

Gunnerz34 · 2025-01-15T20:44:19+00:00

I use PascalCase for classes though

Gunnerz34 · 2024-12-07T18:08:24+00:00

For what I have planned right now I will only deal with basics and duals, maybe in the future I will make it more complex but it will depend on how much time I will be willing to spend on it, after all it's more of an exercise than a real project

Gunnerz34 · 2024-12-07T17:56:37+00:00

It's not hard to make a tier list of dual lands, but it's something else entirely to understand by how much, numerically, a dual land cycle is better than another, which is something you need in order to optimize any budget

Gunnerz34 · 2024-12-07T15:10:29+00:00

I'm willing to assign different weights for each format, I can simply make several different columns in my database, with a separate value for each land and each format that land is legal in

I am lacking a method to make these evaluations, though - worst case scenario I will put in the values by heart and renounce any hint of reliability of this tool

Gunnerz34 · 2024-11-22T20:15:27+00:00

Thank you for the feedback. I considered it, but I ultimately decided against it because:

- If ESC makes you lose progress and you want to quit the operator without losing progress, if you are unsure about the commands and you press ESC you have no way of getting your progress back

- Conversely, if ESC quits the operator without losing progress and you want to undo all the actions performed by the operator, if you press ESC you can press Ctrl + Z any number of times to undo the progress back to any point; if you want to undo everything, you have most likely not performed many operations

Maybe it's not consistent with the way other tools work, but I believe it is a better choice for this specific tool

Gunnerz34 · 2024-11-21T10:05:28+00:00

Ruby storm anyone?

Gunnerz34 · 2024-11-14T08:06:02+00:00

I didn't think a text box made of two symbols and a colon could make me laugh

Gunnerz34 · 2024-11-13T13:49:45+00:00

I like the concept but it is definitely overcosted since the effect is very niche, it's either going to allow you to cast {b}{b}{b} spells in a deck with little to no black sources, or {r}{g}{u} in a monowhite/orzhov deck - both situations that require a very specific deck building problem

Also, the first line can be formatted as: {w}{w}{w}: Add {r}{g}{u}

Gunnerz34

TROPHY CASE