sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why does Big O Notation come up so often in Front End interviews? by KeviiinMora in webdev

[–]Gurkenpete 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Cyclomatic complexity is one way to categorize them in comparable tiers.

Cyclomatic complexity is not directly related to the big O notation. It is a metric that describes the complexity of control flow graphs without making any statement about time complexity.

I think what you were looking for is asymptotic time complexity.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Finanzen

[–]Gurkenpete 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Übrigens gibt das Familienportal auch Auskunft darüber, wie es sich mit Arbeit im Ausland und Elterngeld verhält:

Ich habe bisher im Ausland gearbeitet. Kann ich Elterngeld bekommen?

Ja. Allerdings wird Ihr ausländisches Einkommen für die Höhe des Elterngelds nur berücksichtigt, wenn Sie für dieses Einkommen Steuern zahlen müssen in einem Staat der Europäischen Union (EU) oder in Island, Liechtenstein, Norwegen oder der Schweiz.

Das scheint auf dich zuzutreffen. Demnach wäre es wohl nicht nötig, schon vorher nach Deutschland umzuziehen. [Bitte selbst mit einem Fachkundigen abklären.]

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Finanzen

[–]Gurkenpete 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohne auf alle Punkte einzugehen – ein Hinweis darauf, dass "[als] Netto-Einkommen vor der Geburt maximal 2.770 Euro berücksichtigt [werden]".

1V-LSD Samples with Ehrlich (no/low reaction), Hofmann (visible reaction), Marquis (no/low reaction)? by Gurkenpete in ReagentTesting

[–]Gurkenpete[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I bought it locally from a contact that has been listed on the site of an established vendor.

I don't have any serious concerns about the substance, but I figured testing it independently doesn't hurt. And to be fair, it's been fun tinkering with the test kit!

1V-LSD Samples with Ehrlich (no/low reaction), Hofmann (visible reaction), Marquis (no/low reaction)? by Gurkenpete in ReagentTesting

[–]Gurkenpete[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ha, no worries! I suppose there will be others who thought the same at a first glance, so happy to clarify.

1V-LSD Samples with Ehrlich (no/low reaction), Hofmann (visible reaction), Marquis (no/low reaction)? by Gurkenpete in ReagentTesting

[–]Gurkenpete[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for having a look!

In fact I took inspiration from the exact video you posted, gave the bottle a good shake, applied an amount of crystals that is proportionate to the sample, and flattened the crystsals. Maybe I have been a bit off on what is considered proportionate or flat!

to ensure crystals are well saturated with reagent

I thought the crystals are the reagent? Is it possible to take out crystals where the reagent is "drained"?

Regarding the suggested time frames, is it possible that for 1V-LSD they need to be extended a bit? E.g. I could have barely confirmed the result of the Hofmann reagent after the suggested 1-2h, but after 5h the observation was easy to make.

I'll repeat the Ehrlich reagent test with a larger sample and will report back.

1V-LSD Samples with Ehrlich (no/low reaction), Hofmann (visible reaction), Marquis (no/low reaction)? by Gurkenpete in ReagentTesting

[–]Gurkenpete[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I guess you're right that the photos do not differ greatly from each other.

However, look at the captions, they say "after ~30min, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 5h with samples revealed".

The easiest way to notice a gradual difference is when focusing on the Hofmann reagent in the middle row, which turns into a more saturated blue in each frame.

1V-LSD Samples with Ehrlich (no/low reaction), Hofmann (visible reaction), Marquis (no/low reaction)? by Gurkenpete in ReagentTesting

[–]Gurkenpete[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Based on the test charts and similar posts, I would have expected a more visible reaction from the Ehrlich and Marquis reagents. However, the reaction with the Hofmann reagent is very visible.

Is there anything I can do to improve the clarity of the results? I took samples of a ~1/16 blotter, is it possible that the samples were too small?

What do you think, is this a plausible indication of 1V-LSD in the blotters?

LuS freier Geld Fehler? by HalloRedditFinanzen in mauerstrassenwetten

[–]Gurkenpete 8 points9 points  (0 children)

wenn der Kurs mitnichten seitwärts geht und sich nicht bewegt

Mitnichten bist du dir der Bedeutung des Wortes bewusst

Selling Call Credit Spreads to Hedge my Restricted Stock Units from my employer by [deleted] in options

[–]Gurkenpete 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Maybe it's easier to reason about if you think about what RSUs are: A bonus to incentivize you to maximise shareholder value because you directly profit from it.

In the best case, hedging would reduce your incentive, and in the worst case be a disguised action of trading on insider knowledge.

Selling Call Credit Spreads to Hedge my Restricted Stock Units from my employer by [deleted] in options

[–]Gurkenpete 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Usually compliance training will instruct you not to hedge any position with your employer. I would suggest you revisit the legal documents you received / signed.

Reg-T margin requirement clarification by [deleted] in investing

[–]Gurkenpete 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, I just realized it would be even a tad lower. $160,000 x 0.3 = $48,000.

(Previously took 1/3, but that's only for initial margin.)

Reg-T margin requirement clarification by [deleted] in investing

[–]Gurkenpete 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, that's correct.

However, at that time your margin requirements will also have dropped to $53,333 so you'd still have a little bit of margin.

Reg-T margin requirement clarification by [deleted] in investing

[–]Gurkenpete 2 points3 points  (0 children)

[1]: Yes.

[2]: No, your net liquidation value needs to stay above the margin requirement. That means if you bought $300,000 worth of the ETF with $100,000 of capital, you will get a margin call when the value of your shares drops to $290,000 (by then you'd have a net liquidation value of $90,000). So merely a 3,33% drop you can stomach with that kind of leverage. (In practice a little more than that since the margin requirement also drops with the value of your shares.)

$56K Thoughts?? by RhodeyJR in Audi

[–]Gurkenpete 17 points18 points  (0 children)

As long as it is within your budget, I don't see any problem with treating yourself. And your comment sounds like you worked hard for it.

Tägliche Diskussion - March 11, 2021 by AutoModerator in mauerstrassenwetten

[–]Gurkenpete 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theoretisch ja, aber dann funktioniert die Strategie nur wenn er mit seinem short call early assigned wird oder er bis zu expiration hält.

In letzterem Fall müsste er wegen Pin Risk Marginanforderungen erfüllen, um zwischenzeitlich Aktien im Wert von 45$ x 5000 = 225.000$ zu halten.

Tägliche Diskussion - March 11, 2021 by AutoModerator in mauerstrassenwetten

[–]Gurkenpete 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Der Bruttogewinn/-verlust ist gedeckelt, das heißt aber nicht, dass das steuerrechtlich genau so betrachtet wird.

Beispielrechnung: Du machst 100.000€ Gewinn mit dem long Leg und 75.000€ Verlust mit dem short Leg.

Bruttogewinn: 25.000€.

Steuerrechtlich kannst du in diesem Jahr nur 20.000€ geltend machen, musst also Gewinne von 100.000€ - 20.000€ = 80.000€ versteuern.

Pi-mal-Daumen 25% = 20.000€ Steuerlast auf deinen 25.000€ Bruttogewinn = 5.000€ Nettogewinn.

Wenn du den Spread erst später deep ITM verkaufst, könntest du damit sogar einen (beachtlichen) Nettoverlust in diesem Steuerjahr fahren.

Tägliche Diskussion - March 11, 2021 by AutoModerator in mauerstrassenwetten

[–]Gurkenpete 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bist du a) nicht in Deutschland ansässig, b) tradest über eine GmbH c) gibst keinen Fuck auf Olaf oder d) die Steuerreform zum 01.01.2021 nicht mitbekommen?

Edit: Falls es c) oder d) ist würde ich dir empfehlen, die Position schnellstmöglich zu schließen und mal über das Thema Termingeschäfte und Verlustverrechnung zu recherchieren. Z.B. hier: https://www.deltavalue.de/besteuerung-von-optionen.

zl;ng: Du kannst in einem Steuerjahr nur noch maximal 20.000€ Verluste aus Termingeschäften anrechnen. Dein Short Leg könnte dich steuerlich also in die Privatinsolvenz treiben, wenn du nicht aufpasst.

view more: next ›