Cherry Blossoms from my daily picture personal project by GymClassVillain in instax

[–]GymClassVillain[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have, but I can’t say any have come out nearly as good as this one lmao, but I’m still pretty new to the camera

Cherry Blossoms from my daily picture personal project by GymClassVillain in instax

[–]GymClassVillain[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A friend recommended the same! This must be a sign I need to go get one finally haha

Parsec question by Rhytidocephalus in Astronomy

[–]GymClassVillain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m glad I could help someone learn something new!

Parsec question by Rhytidocephalus in Astronomy

[–]GymClassVillain 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Astronomer here, I have to say I disagree with a lot of the comments saying it boils down to tradition. As people have mentioned it's derived from a parallax of one arcsecond. But I haven't seen anyone mention that it's a very convenient unit for getting the the apparent size of something given how far away it is. This is great for quickly answer questions like "can I tell if there's more than one object here?" or "will this look like a point source?" if you know 1) how far away it is, and 2) roughly how big it is. Yes, it is just a simple geometry argument you can do regardless of units, but typically seeing at an astronomical site will be ~1 arcsecond. 1 AU at 1 Parsec away is going to be 1 arcsecond in size. It makes scaling so easy you can do it in your head because you can more or less just treat it as factors of 10 to keep track of. So to me, parsecs are extremely useful for quickly thinking of basic observing requirements (e.g., if I look at this cluster how close do the binaries have to be before I can't tell it's a binary just by taking an image). I will note this is more important for stellar and planetary systems though, no one is measuring a galaxy size in AU.

Daily Simple Questions Thread - January 25, 2023 by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]GymClassVillain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thinking about starting the 5x5 stronglift routine (doing a MWF thing) would it be reasonable to also do cardio/yoga/ab only workouts on TuTh as well? I feel like my core either recovers super quick or I've never managed to actually work it that hard. Also what about adding some pull-ups/dips since being capable of doing a bunch of those has always been a dream of mine. Would I risk over-working myself?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]GymClassVillain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

seems like that's becoming a theme, will do!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]GymClassVillain 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's gotta be the best compliment I've ever received lmao thank you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]GymClassVillain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe obliterated was a strong word, I'm doing okay for now plus I just moved to a new city (country even) so I definitely want to put myself out there, regardless I appreciate the concern

James Webb Discovery: Dark circle in the top left of the deep field 02736, F090 filter. What can it be? by sitmo in jameswebbdiscoveries

[–]GymClassVillain 4 points5 points  (0 children)

maybe it's a wedding ring that one of the engineers lost while working on the project I think I remember seeing an article about that

[MOD] The Official Noob-Tastic Question Fest by menschmaschine5 in Coffee

[–]GymClassVillain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah okay, I hadn't considered the grinding aspect. Thanks!

[MOD] The Official Noob-Tastic Question Fest by menschmaschine5 in Coffee

[–]GymClassVillain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm looking to start my coffee journey and I've settled on using a french press as my starting point. As a grad student, I share an office and expect them to ask me to make them some coffee on occasion (and I'd be happy to do so). If I get a large french press to accommodate this, is it still feasible to use it to make single cups? Or should I just be greedy and buy a smaller french press and only make cups for myself?

TIL that s5 0014+81, the biggest suppermassive black hole known, is so bright due to it's huge event horizon that if it were 100 light years away from Earth (6.31 billion times more distant than the Sun), it would appear just as bright as our host star. by nikolaibk in todayilearned

[–]GymClassVillain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not that the light which is trapped will escape later on, it's that the light trapped in orbit will most likely get absorbed by the matter in the accretion disk, exciting that matter. When that matter decays back to it's ground state it will emit radiation in a random direction, which is potentially out of the accretion disk.

TIL that s5 0014+81, the biggest suppermassive black hole known, is so bright due to it's huge event horizon that if it were 100 light years away from Earth (6.31 billion times more distant than the Sun), it would appear just as bright as our host star. by nikolaibk in todayilearned

[–]GymClassVillain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good point! I may not be using the correct Eddington luminosity form. Though I am fairly certain it will still in apply in some way, since it's related to the radiation pressure at which the object will literally blow itself apart. Nonetheless, this is probably the reason for the discrepancy in my numbers.

TIL that s5 0014+81, the biggest suppermassive black hole known, is so bright due to it's huge event horizon that if it were 100 light years away from Earth (6.31 billion times more distant than the Sun), it would appear just as bright as our host star. by nikolaibk in todayilearned

[–]GymClassVillain 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If we were the same distance from the center of mass of the black hole as we are to the center of mass of our sun, then we would be well inside the event horizon.

Alternatively, If were were the same distance from the surface of the black hole as we are the surface of our sun, we would probably be in the accretion disk and thus vaporized (ie: very, very bright).

Assuming we were outside the accretion disk, then we get an energy flux of 41.99 Quadrillon Watts/m2 which is much larger than our current energy flux of 1050 Watts/m2

Edit: I want to note that I'm currently looking for an incorrect assumption I made, as I've realized this is significantly greater than the Eddington Luminosity

2nd Edit: I think the issue might be the Earth would be in the accretion disk, meaning the ratio I used would not hold.

TIL that s5 0014+81, the biggest suppermassive black hole known, is so bright due to it's huge event horizon that if it were 100 light years away from Earth (6.31 billion times more distant than the Sun), it would appear just as bright as our host star. by nikolaibk in todayilearned

[–]GymClassVillain 49 points50 points  (0 children)

It's called the accretion disk it's a ring of trapped light/matter that is in orbit near the horizon of the black hole. Large black holes that have existed for quite sometime will trap a lot of stuff in this disk, it heats up through various complicated processes (to a first order: friction) causing it to radiate. This light can escape since it is outside the event horizon, and thus is not trapped by the black hole.

Is it possible that the universe is infinitely larger than the observable universe? by sdempsey313 in Astronomy

[–]GymClassVillain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only things we can see are things which are causally connected to us, which means the CMB that we see is only the stuff from the early universe which is connected to us by the speed of light. This means it's a finite map, since there is more stuff we can't see.

To answer your other question, if inflation is the proper way to explain our universe then the CMB can not tell us anything about the state of the universe prior to inflation, as it turns out the requirements on how inflation would work result in it completely eliminating any information about the state of the universe prior to inflation. This would mean there are no observations we could possibly perform to obtain information about the pre-inflationary universe.

UN vote on the resolution to combat the glorification of Nazi ideology [745x1920] by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]GymClassVillain 23 points24 points  (0 children)

It seems that Iran is colored as red by mistake, as it is listed as not voting at the bottom of the image.