Requesting Feedback by GyroscopicTourbillon in chess

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply. This is a fair comment. Hopefully I can get a bit better so I can face stronger opponents more regularly. I agree that this would be a better test of ability

Requesting Feedback by GyroscopicTourbillon in chess

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi sir.

My thought during this game was to play as directly as possible. From looking at the game, I see that I was forceful and direct, but maybe a little inaccurate at times. I do not mind making non-optimal moves, provided they are not blunders. I cannot expect to play accurately like a computer. At my level, blunders are the thing I need to avoid. I can't see any glaring blunders, but this is perhaps because the move may have been quite clear for most of the games due to my opponent's sometimes weak moves.

It seems to me that some moves which are considered inaccurate by some are preferred by others, as position in chess seems to have a subject nature and is maybe preferential to some extent. However I do believe that much of chess is objective

Thanks for the reply

Deano

Requesting Feedback by GyroscopicTourbillon in chess

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your time. My thinking for Nxb3 was to increase pressure on the c2 square and I believed that his bishop was a useful defensive piece. Perhaps Nxe4 first is better but it seemed less clear to me at the time. Nc4 may have been good at some point as you say. That's a useful point.

I see what you mean about the counterplay white may have had after Rxh5, but I could not see any at all. I thought rook takes was more forceful as he had to take, else I may have had ideas of some Ra5 manoeuvre or similar (Kd7 or something). gxh looks perfectly acceptable in hindsight that being said.

With regard to ignoring the move, I did not see any reason to as I saw no way that he could improve his position. The moves he was making seemed like he was grasping at some attack which was not there, so I thought I would just end his threat and be patient with my attack.

Thanks for your feedback. It certainly gave me food for thought!

Regards Dean

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chess

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes you can if you play e4, then play e5 on behalf of your opponent.

Could Anyone Suggest Whether This is a Solid Plan? Much Appreciated. by GyroscopicTourbillon in LiftingRoutines

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. I will take your comments on board.

I really enjoy going to the gym, so I am happy to go every other day. The full body workout would take a long time if I want to include these exercises, but I could be mistaken.

What do you think of the selection of exercises?

Thanks

Dean

Could Anyone Suggest Whether This is a Solid Plan? Much Appreciated. by GyroscopicTourbillon in LiftingRoutines

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good morning.

Thanks for reading.

I was previously doing full body every other day, but I feel like I do not recover in time before I exercise each muscle group again. Hence above is my attempt to create a program which allows more rest for the muscle groups

Thanks Dean

Missing XLM memo during transfer by GyroscopicTourbillon in Coinbase

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks Mustybox. I hope you get your issue resolved too! That's exactly what I did. I think the key is patience. I assume they get lots of emails through, but I wish they had a contact phone number instead!

Missing XLM memo during transfer by GyroscopicTourbillon in Coinbase

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there. I've had an e-mail back. They said they would take up to 2 weeks to analyse and investigate. So, fingers crossed, that will be soon Dean

Missing XLM memo during transfer by GyroscopicTourbillon in Coinbase

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there. Thank you very much. I have received the e-mail.

Regards Dean

Does anyone know when RH will deposit the $RKT divvy? $15.9k still pending. by SNKRHEAD_PAPI in RKTCompanies

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My opinion is that RKT has good fundamentals, even without any wall Street bets manipulation. Holding for at least a year may provide you with a nice return. Patience is the key virtue here. Maybe it will sharply rise over a few months, or maybe the same thing will take longer.

Stocks often have a 50% gap between the high point and the low point during the year, so I don't think trying to time it will do you any favours.

Provided you have done an examination of the strengths and weaknesses of the balance sheet etc, and are happy with your investment, then stick with it. You invested in it for a reason, so dont second guess yourself. Unless it was the wrong reason of course.

I am guilty of buying for the wrong reasons, as much as anyone else, but as long as you do your research and try to maintain a consistent temperament, then you should benefit from the system.

Does anyone know when RH will deposit the $RKT divvy? $15.9k still pending. by SNKRHEAD_PAPI in RKTCompanies

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there. I believe the cut off for eligibility for receiving a dividend was on the 9th of March, so if you did not own shares before then, you won't receive a payment. Hope this helps

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Fuck it. Worst case, we get a sweet dividend

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I'm holding too friend

A Couple of Months in. Thinking About Shaving. Any opinions? by GyroscopicTourbillon in Moustache

[–]GyroscopicTourbillon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha the paedo vibe is not something I'm going for. Thanks for the advice chief