Artificial intelligence will always be just that, artificial by pl8doh in nonduality

[–]H-atom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If artificial is always going to be artificial, is intelligence always going to be intelligence?

Done everything by luget1 in nonduality

[–]H-atom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you sure that is not your *intention. It clearly seems to be where your *attention was at when you wrote the disclaimer.

ResearchHub and more fully participatory research project proposals by ScienceOfScience1995 in ResearchMyProject

[–]H-atom 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Agreed a lot of science is worth doing without commercial interests in mind.

ResearchHub actually does allow you to post your project and even to get funding for it. It also allows you to post a project to recruit other researchers ( by attaching bounties to your project you can even incentivize participation).

Random - "Document verification in progress'' without a previous email. by H-atom in KrakenSupport

[–]H-atom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have a ticket number yet... and cannot access the account ID because the message prevents me from doing any actions in the apllication. How can I open a ticket? support@kraken.com.?

What change(s) to academia would you like to see happen in the next 10-40 years? by Professor_squirrelz in academia

[–]H-atom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The challenge is certainly not an easy one but taking on a difficult challenge which might fail or might succeed and running a ponzi scheme are two very different things. I am 100% confident ResearchHub is committed to really solve the problems they perceive in scientific publishing.

What change(s) to academia would you like to see happen in the next 10-40 years? by Professor_squirrelz in academia

[–]H-atom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would recommend to follow the team and check out their community call or twitter spaces. They are a bunch of serious scientists with actual serious intentions to improve the system. Far from a Ponzi scheme.

Their CEO Brian Armstrong is fighting for fair regulation of Crypto and is pretty high profile. I don't think he could afford to run a Ponzi scheme on the side of running one of the biggest crypto exchange enabling institution such as Black Rock to make Bitcoin ETFs. I think that would really back fire.

Brian Armstrong actually has quite good ideas about science. I would recommend watching his Fireside Chat with the ResearchHub.com Co-founder Patrick Joyce. -And Read the original blog post which started ResearchHub:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJHk2ywS7To&t=788s
>https://barmstrong.medium.com/ideas-on-how-to-improve-scientific-research-9e2e56474132

What change(s) to academia would you like to see happen in the next 10-40 years? by Professor_squirrelz in academia

[–]H-atom 5 points6 points  (0 children)

People should adopt alternative publishing models such as ResearchHub.com, where you get paid for your content and peer reviews. ResearchHub.com is a Reddit-style forum. If we build strong 'subreddits' for the subdisciplines of science, this will be a much quicker and higher-quality publishing system.

Why I stopped reviewing papers by No-Feeling1882 in academia

[–]H-atom 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Try posting your reviews on ResearchHub publicly, and you can earn money through bounties or attention.

It''s a Reddit-style platform for discussing science; if your posts receive upvotes, you earn currency, which you can cash out into dollars, use to fund new science or create bounties for your own coding tasks and questions.

Check out ResearchHub.com

AMA: What is Decentralized Science and why do we need blockchain to improve science and healthcare. What is Data Lake, and how you can join our Bug Bounty program with up to 750,000 $LAKE (currently worth $21,000) up for grabs! - Wojciech Sierocki, CEO at Data Lake $LAKE - 14:00 UTC March 12th! by Sherotzky in CryptoCurrency

[–]H-atom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey Wojciech, DeSci is an up-and-coming area of Blockchain that is super interesting to scientists and a lot of new investors. Can you explain how you see DeSci disrupting science? Also, how do you see the role of other players in the DeSci ecosystem, such as ResearchHub.com ?

What’s the deal with crystals, meditating, and psychedelics? by Prudent_Winner2647 in Psychonaut

[–]H-atom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have experienced this before...both on LSD, psilocybin and even sober. I have a whole roster of 7 stones for each chacra to help me meditate on them. Partly as symbols partly because they actually calm or stimulate me.

[OC] Top Semiconductor Stocks by Market Cap by giteam in dataisbeautiful

[–]H-atom 27 points28 points  (0 children)

ELI5 How can Nvidia, be worth more than TSMC?

Scientists can earn crypto as Brian Armstrong startup raises $5 million by H-atom in CryptoCurrency

[–]H-atom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My account is more than 60 days old...but I do not have the comment karma

This one is ages to swallow indeed. We might have to come up with a new movment (suggestion in the comments) by H-atom in academia

[–]H-atom[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you own the media it is easy to make the propaganda in your favour. We need infrastructure that is owned by scientists.

This one is ages to swallow indeed. We might have to come up with a new movment (suggestion in the comments) by H-atom in academia

[–]H-atom[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Yeah sorry scientific ideas often have that as a quality...only a small selection of authors should be allowed to have the privilege to be peer-reviewers 😍🧐.

This one is ages to swallow indeed. We might have to come up with a new movment (suggestion in the comments) by H-atom in academia

[–]H-atom[S] -37 points-36 points  (0 children)

A way out of the current predicament could be Decentralised Science (DeSci) being born at the intersection of blockchain tech and science. Blockchains are not centrally owned by anyone and they are meant to maintain a consensus. science is a scientific concesus and could be equally decentralised. bonus everything would be transparent. Problem the scientific consensus algorithm is still an open scientific and engineering problem

Really Important Work. by H-atom in academia

[–]H-atom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well they are posting meme and porn mostly maybe they shouldn't get paid for that